(Our Mishnah forbids Chalas Chutz la'Aretz to a Zav, Zavah...) Even R. Yosi (who says that he need not immerse for it) agrees to this. The matter (such a Tum'ah) is stringent, for the Tum'ah came from his own body.

(Mishnah): And it may be eaten with a Zar at the table.

Inference (R. Yonah): (We are not concerned lest some fall in the Zar's food.) This teaches that it does not forbid [when it was mixed] in less than 100 [parts of Chulin], and one need not remove [from the mixture an amount equated to what fell in, and give it to a Kohen] in [a mixture of] 101.

R. Avahu ruled in Botzrah that it needs a majority [of Chulin to be Mevatel it].

(R. Ze'ira): Our Mishnah [is not concerned lest it become mixed with the Zar's food. This] teaches that [it is Batel] even one in one (without a majority).

(R. Yochanan): Raboseinu in Golah (Bavel) used to separate Terumos and Ma'aseros, until the Rovim stopped them.

Who are the Rovim? They are [the last] translators (R. Chiya's sons).

(R. Ze'ira citing Rav Yehudah citing Shmuel): Chalah of Chutz la'Aretz and Terumah of Chutz la'Aretz, one may eat and separate afterwards.

(R. Ba citing Shmuel): They were concerned [in Chutz la'Aretz] for Terumah only for grain, wine and oil (before the Rovim stopped even this; these are mid'Oraisa in Eretz Yisrael).

(R. Heila citing Shmuel): They were concerned only for Terumah Gedolah, but for Yerek, they were not concerned even for Terumah Gedolah.

This is like Isi bar Akaviya says, Ma'aseros of Yerek is mid'Rabanan (in Eretz Yisrael, without even an Asmachta, so they did not decree at all in Chutz la'Aretz - HA'GAON RAV C. KANIEVSKY, SHLITA).

(Beraisa): Chalah of a Nochri in Eretz Yisrael, and Terumas Nochri in Chutz la'Aretz, we inform him that he need not [separate], and [even a Zar] may eat it.

And it may be given to any Kohen, whether a Kohen Chaver (who is trustworthy about Taharah) or a Kohen Am ha'Aretz.

Some [of the matters in our Mishnah] are given to Anshei (any Kohen of the) Mishmar, and some are given to [any] Kohen. Bechoros and Bikurim are given to Anshei Mishmar, and the rest are to any Kohen.

Question (R. Yirmeyah, to R. Ze'ira): What is the source that Cherem goes to Anshei Mishmar?

Answer #1 (R. Ze'ira): "Ki'Sedei ha'Cherem la'Kohen Tihyeh Achuzaso.'' (It is like a Sedei Achuzah that the owner was Makdish, and did not redeem it before Yovel. It goes to Anshei Mishmar.

Question: A Sedei Achuzah itself, what is the source that it goes to Anshei Mishmar?

Answer: It is because it says "la'Kohen Tihyeh Achuzaso.'' (This connotes a known Kohen.)

Question: It says "v'Nasan la'Kohen ha'Zero'a veha'Lechayim veha'Keivah.'' If so, it should be for Anshei Mishmar!

Answer #2 (R. Acha citing R. Avahu citing R. Yochanan): "Kol Cherem Kodesh Kodoshim Hu la'Shem'' - just like Kodshei Kodoshim are to Anshei Mishmar, also Cherem is to Anshei Mishmar.

Question: If so, also Metaltelim [should be to Anshei Mishmar, for the verse discusses all Cherem]!

(Beraisa): What is the difference between [Cherem of] land and Metaltelim? Land is to Anshei Mishmar, and Metaltelim are to any Kohen.

Answer (R. Yosi bei R. Bun citing R. Chiya citing Rav Sheshes): "Ishei Hash-m v'Nachalso Yochelun'' - just like Ishim (Korbanos) are to Anshei Mishmar, also Nachlah is to Anshei Mishmar. (Metaltelim are not called Nachalah - GRA.)

Twenty-four Matanos were given to Aharon and his sons - 10 in the Mikdash, four in Yerushalayim and 10 in the Gevulin (outside Yerushalayim);

These are [eaten] in the Mikdash - Chatas, Asham, Zivchei Shalmei Tzibur (the lambs offered with Shtei ha'Lechem), Chatas ha'Of, Asham Taluy, the Log of oil of a Metzora, Shtei ha'Lechem, Lechem ha'Panim, Shirei Menachos and the Omer;

These are [eaten or received] in Yerushalayim - Bechoros, Bikurim, the parts (Chazah v'Shok) taken from Todah (this includes Shelamim; it says Todah to include one loaf from each kind of bread that he brings) and [Zero'a and bread] from Eil Nazir, and skins of Kodshim;

These are in the Gevulin - Terumah, Terumas Ma'aser, Chalah, the foreleg, jaw and stomach [of a slaughtered Chulin Behemah], first shearings (of sheep), Gezel ha'Ger, redemption of firstborn sons, redemption of Bechor donkeys, Cherem and Sedei Achuzah.

(Mishnah): R. Yehudah forbids Bikurim.

R. Yehudah holds like he taught elsewhere, for R. Yehudah said 'we give [Bikurim] only to a Chaver, b'Tovah' (the Yisrael has Tovas Hana'ah, i.e. a Yisrael may pay him on condition to give it to a particular Kohen - RASHASH Bikurim 3:12).

(R. Yonah): R. Akiva [permits giving vetch of Terumah to any Kohen; he] holds like he taught elsewhere;

R. Akiva said, all actions [with vetch of Terumah may be] b'Tum'ah.

Rebuttal (R. Yosi): You could even say that he holds oppositely [elsewhere. Vetch] is different, for one is not wont to be Metamei food of his animal.

Question: Why didn't they decree [Ma'aseros] on Bekiyah (another species that people do not normally eat)?

Answer: People [covertly] took it out with them from Alexandria in their shoes (the kingdom forbade this. It was not common when they decreed about vetch, so even later they did not decree - R. SHLOMO SIRILIYO, MAHARA FULDA.)

Question: When did they decree about vetch?

Answer #1 (R. Yosi): It was in days of famine (in pressed circumstances, people ate it).

Answer #2 (R. Chanina citing Rebbi): It was in the days of David.

They say, these are the same (it was in days of famine, in the days of David).