(Beraisa - R. Yehudah): In Yehudah, initially, they used to set up two Shushbinin (close friends), one of the Kalah and one of the Chasan (to guard against trickery with the sheet used to check for Dam Besulim). Even so, they set them up only at the time of Nisu'in. (If they were secluded during Eirusin, they would not set up witnesses, but afterwards there is no Ta'anas Besulim.)

In Galil, they did not do so.

In Yehudah, initially they used to seclude the Chasan with the Kalah [during Eirusin], so he will feel intimate with her. In Galil, they did not do so.

In Yehudah, initially, the Shushbinin would investigate in the place of the Chasan and in the place of Kalah (that there is no trickery with Dam Besulim. This is when they were not secluded during Eirusin, so there is Ta'anas Besulim.) In Galil, they did not do so.

In Yehudah, initially, the Shushbinin would sleep in the place of the Chasan and in the place of Kalah. In Galil, they did not do so. In Galil, they did not do so. (Me'iri 12a - there was no need to teach so about Galil. There were no Shushbinin there at all! It is Agav the other clauses. Ritva 12a - in Galil there was one Shushbin, to guard the sheet, but he did not sleep with them.)

Anyone who did not do like this custom, he cannot claim Ta'anas Besulim.

(Mishnah - R. Yehudah): Every vine has wine. One that has no wine is Trukati. (This is a euphemism. Every Besulah has blood, but there are certain families in which they do not have.)

Question (R. Yirmeyah): If so, there is no Ta'anas Besulim according to R. Yehudah (she can say that she is from such a family)!

Strengthening of question (R. Yosah): The one who says that there is Ta'anas Besulim is R. Yehudah!

(Beraisa - R. Yehudah): In Yehudah, initially, they used to set up two Shushbinin, one of the Kalah and one of the Chasan. Even so, they set them up only at the time of Nisu'in. In Galil, they did not do so... [In Yehudah, initially, the Shushbinin] would sleep in the place of the Chasan and in the place of Kalah. In Galil, they did not do so.

Question: How can we answer [for R. Yehudah]?

Answer: She must bring a proof that she is from a family of Trukati.

(R. Yirmeyah): The Beraisa means that anyone who did not do like the custom of Yehudah, [even] in Galil [he cannot claim Ta'anas Besulim].

Objection (R. Yosi): Is the custom of Yehudah in Galil Torah testimony?! (Even their custom is no guarantee against trickery!)

Rather, [one can claim if he did] like the custom of Yehudah in Yehudah, or like the custom of Galil in Galil (i.e. even without setting up two Shushbinin).

Question: Since you say that it is not Torah testimony (and there can be Ta'anas Besulim without it), he should not set up [Shushbinin, even in Yehudah]!

Note: It is immodest to have Bi'ah in front of witnesses. If there could be Ta'anas Besulim even without this, e.g. in Galil, why do they have such a custom in Yehudah? (PF)

Answer: Rather, it is lest Benos Yisrael be wanton in Zenus. (Since they know that Shushbinin will investigate, it is hard to falsify matters, so they fear to have Bi'ah before marriage.)

Question: If it is [only] lest Benos Yisrael be wanton in Zenus (but it is not solid testimony), even if he set up [Shushbinin like Minhag Yehudah], he should not be believed!

Answer (R. Yosi citing R. Ila): A man does not make expenditures [for a Nisu'in] and defame his wife (accuse her of Zenus. If he decided that he does not desire her, he could have divorced her without making Nisu'in (and not pay a Kesuvah)! This is a Chazakah of human nature; due to this, he is believed.)

Question: If it is because a man does not make expenditures and defame his wife, he should be believed even if he did not set up [Shushbinin]!

Answer (Rav Heila): It is due to one suspected man (i.e. someone might do so, even though it is not common). It is due to one immoral person. (Now that this is the custom, if one deviated, his Chazakah is weakened.)