(Mishnah): If a garment was dyed with peels of (fruit of) Orlah, it must be burned.

If it became mixed with others, all of them must be burned. R. Meir says so;

Chachamim say, they are Batel in 201.

(Gemara - Mishnah): If a garment was dyed with peels of Orlah...

Source: It says "va'Araltem Orlaso Es Piryo'' - some teach what is next to its fruit. Some teach what is Orel (wraps) its fruit.

The one who says what is next to its fruit, peels and pits are included. The one who says what wraps its fruit, peels are included, but not pits.

Question: [According to this opinion,] what is the source for pits?

Answer #1: In the end, [also] he must expound "Es Piryo'' - what is next to its fruit.

Answer #2: Some want to learn from "va'Araltem Orlaso Es Piryo'' - something that wraps its fruit (peels), and what its fruit wraps it (pits).

(R. Avahu citing R. Lazar): Wherever it says "Lo Sochal,'' "Lo Sochlu'' or Lo Yochlu'', you put an Isur Hana'ah just like the Isur to eat, unless the verse explicitly teaches [to permit benefit], like it teaches about Ever Min ha'Chai and Neveilah;

Question: What did the verse explicitly teach about Ever Min ha'Chai?

Answer: "U'Vasar ba'Sadeh Tereifah Lo Socheilu [la'Kelev Tashlichun Oso.'' This will be explained].

Question: What did the verse explicitly teach about Neveilah?

Answer: "Lo Sochlu Chol Neveilah la'Ger Asher bi'Sh'arecha Titnenah va'Achalah [Oh Machor l'Nochri'', i.e. one may sell it].

Question: Who forbade [a Tereifah] to a dog?! (Why must the verse permit this? Rather, because it says "Lo Sochelu'', we would have said that it is Asur b'Hana'ah. The verse permits feeding it to a dog to teach that one may benefit from it.)

Question: It says "Kol Chelev Shor v'Chesev va'Ez Lo Sochelu.'' If so (according to R. Avahu), you put an Isur Hana'ah on something forbidden to eat! (We do not find that Chelev is Asur b'Hana'ah!)

Answer: There is different, for it says "v'Chelev Neveilah v'Chelev Tereifah [Ye'aseh l'Chol Melachah'', to permit Hana'ah].

Question: It says "Rav Es ha'Dam Lo Sochelu.'' If so, you should put an Isur Hana'ah [on blood], like the Isur to eat it! (Blood is not Asur b'Hana'ah!)

Answer: There is different, for it says "Al ha'Aretz Tishpechenu ka'Mayim'' - just like water is Mutar b'Hana'ah, so blood is Mutar b'Hana'ah.

Question: It says "Al Ken Lo Yochlu Vnei Yisrael Es Gid ha'Nasheh''!

Answer (R. Avahu): I [asked this, and] answered this from Gid ha'Nasheh of a Neveilah. (The Torah permitted Hana'ah from a Neveilah, including its Gid. The Gid of a Shechutah is no different, i.e. there is no reason why it should be forbidden more.)

Question: It says [about Chadash] "v'Lechem v'Kali v'Charmel Lo Sochlu''!

Answer (R. Aba Mari): There is different, for the verse fixed a time [for the Isur, i.e. before the Omer. R. Avahu's general rule is for permanent Isurim.]

Question: It says "Lo Sochlum Ki Sheketz Hem''!

Answer (R. Aba Mari): The Torah excluded the Isur Hana'ah in them ("Hem'', i.e. they are forbidden, but not benefit from them - GRA).

(R. Avahu citing R. Yochanan): One who makes a bandage from Shor ha'Niskal (an ox sentenced to be stoned) or from Chametz that [a Yisrael owned and] Pesach passed over on it, he is not lashed, for its Lav is not explicit (the Torah wrote an Isur Achilah. We forbid Hana'ah, but one is not lashed for it - R. SHLOMO SIRILIYO).

[If one benefited] from Kil'ai ha'Kerem he is lashed, for R. Chanina said "Pen Tukdash'' - [we read this like] Pen Tukad Esh (lest it need to be burned).

[If one benefited] from Orlah, this is a question, for a [Mitzvas] Aseh distances [benefit from] it ("va'Araltem Orlaso''). A Lav to distance it is not found.

Question (against R. Yochanan - Beraisa) Question: Since it says "Sakol Yisakel ha'Shor'', do we not know that it is forbidden to eat its flesh? Why does it say "v'Lo Ye'achel Es Besaro''?

Answer: This teaches that just like it is forbidden to eat, so it is forbidden to benefit from it. (R. Yochanan said that one is not lashed for Hana'ah from it, since its Isur is not explicit!)

Summation of question: What does R. Yochanan learn from this [verse]?

Answer: He explains that it [forbids the meat] when the owner slaughtered it before the final verdict.

Question (R. Ze'ira, to R. Avahu): Here you say so ("Lo Sochal,'' "Lo Sochlu'' or Lo Yochlu'' forbids Hana'ah), and here you say so (one is not lashed for Hana'ah from Shor ha'Niskal or from Chametz she'Avar Alav ha'Pesach)?!

Answer (R. Avahu): [Indeed, these teachings are inconsistent! I taught] one of them in the name of R. Lazar, and one of them in the name of R. Yochanan.