(Beraisa - R. Yehudah): Everything that the Tzibur and an individual offers in the Ohel Mo'ed in the Midbar, he offers in the Ohel Mo'ed in Gilgal;

What is the difference between the Ohel Mo'ed in the Midbar, and the Ohel Mo'ed in Gilgal? When the Ohel Mo'ed was in the Midbar, there was no Heter [for an individual to build a] Bamah. When the Ohel Mo'ed was in Gilgal, there was a Heter Bamah, and [one could build] his Bamah on his roof, and he may offer on it only Olah and Shelamim (but not Menachos and Nezirus).

Chachamim say, everything that the Tzibur offers in the Ohel Mo'ed in the Midbar, they offer in the Ohel Mo'ed in Gilgal.

What is Rabanan's reason? "Lo Sa'asu'' in Gilgal "k'Chol Asher Anachnu Osim Po ha'Yom'' (the Tzibur and individuals offer even obligations, and even without a fixed time). What will you offer there? Something that comes to Yashrus ("Ish Kol ha'Yashar b'Einav'', i.e. voluntary). What is this? It is Olah and Shelamim. (This limitation applies to an individual.)

What is R. Yehudah's reason? In a place that "Ish Kol ha'Yashar b'Einav'' (individuals offer what they want, i.e. Bamas Yachid), do not do "k'Chol Asher Anachnu Osim Po ha'Yom.'' What will you offer there? Something that comes to Yashrus ("Ish Kol ha'Yashar b'Einav'', i.e. voluntary). What is this? It is Olah and Shelamim. (However, one may offer on the Bamas Tzibur just like in the Midbar - ha'Gaon Rav C. Kanievsky, Shlita.)

R. Yehudah says, an individual is warned (Lo Sa'asu...), and an individual is permitted, and his Bamah is on his roof, and he is permitted Olah and Shelamim;

Rabanan say, even the Tzibur and an individual are warned (Lo Sa'asu...). The Tzibur is totally permitted, and an individual retains his Isur (even on a Bamah Gedolah, he may not offer obligations).

(Beraisa, in the name of R. Shimon): The Tzibur brings [in Gilgal] only what the Torah fixed [a time] for it. (This is unlike Chachamim and R. Yehudah, who say that the Tzibur offered in Gilgal like in the Midbar.)

R. Shimon holds that once Ma'aser Sheni was fixed, it did not cease. (This is not relevant here. It is brought below, and was copied here.)

Question: What is the difference between them (Chachamim and R. Shimon)?

Answer #1 (R. Ba bar Mamal): They differ about Par Helam Davar. (It is an obligation of the Tzibur without a fixed time.)

Answer #2 (R. Yosah): They differ about Nedavah of the Tzibur (Olos offered when the Mizbe'ach is idle).

(Beraisa): The same applies to a man or woman (they may offer on a Bamah).

Objection (R. Yochanan): A woman may not [offer on a Bamah]. It says "Ish'' in the Parshah!

(Beraisa): Also Nezirus (all permit it on a Bamah, like Nedarim and Nedavos.)

Objection (R. Yochanan): Nezirus is not [permitted on a Bamah. He accepted Isurei Nezirus, and automatically the Korbanos] are an obligation!

(Beraisa): Also Nesachim (are offered on a Bamas Yachid.)

(R. Yosah bei R. Bun): The Tana who taught Nesachim argues with Rebbi;

(Beraisa - Rebbi): I say that even from when Yisrael entered Eretz Yisrael, Nesachim are offered only inside (on a Bamah Gedolah);

What is the reason? "Ba'Kodesh Hasech Nesech Shechar la'Shem'' - the Lav is written only inside [ba'Kodesh].

Question: What is the source [that it is forbidden] outside?

Answer #1: We learn from the following. What is the source for one who slaughters Pesach on a Bamas Yachid at a time of Isur Bamos that he transgresses a Lav? It says "Lo Suchal Lizbo'ach Es ha'Pasach b'Achad'';

Question: He is Chayav Kares, and you say so (what is the source for a Lav)?!

Answer (Reish Lakish): It discusses one who slaughters [Pesach on Erev Pesach] after six hours Lo Lishmah at a time of Heter Bamos. (Bamos are permitted for Olah and Shelamim, but not for Pesach.)

Why does [the Beraisa] say at a time of Isur Bamah? It is a time when his Bamah is forbidden [for Pesach. At other times, it is like Shelamim.]

Why does [Reish Lakish] say Lo Lishmah? It is lest you say that [Lo Lishmah] it is a Shelamim, and it is Kosher [on a Bamah].

Answer #2: We learn from the following. One might have thought that if he slaughtered after six hours it is Kosher. [Since he asked only about after six,] this implies that before six hours it is Kosher. Do we not discuss Lo Lishmah?!

Inference (R. Yosah): This teaches that Shelamim that comes due to Pesach (e.g. Pesach was lost, and another was offered in place of it. The initial Pesach is offered for Shelamim) is Kosher on a Bamah.

Question: An Olah that comes due to Asham (e.g. the owner died. It is Ro'eh (it grazes until it gets a Mum, redeemed, and Olah is brought with the money), according to R. Lazar, is it Kosher on a Bamah?

Answer: We learn from the following. The rule is, anything brought due to Neder or Nedavah is offered on a Bamah, and anything not brought due to Neder or Nedavah is not offered on a Bamah. (Shirei Korban - R. Lazar holds that one may volunteer Asham Taluy. Therefore, it is considered brought due to Neder or Nedavah.)

(R. Yosi ben Chaninah): An animal is permitted [to offer it on a Bamah when Bamos are forbidden] only through a Navi [for Hora'as Sha'ah]. What is the reason? It says "Hishamer Lecha Pen Ta'aleh Olasecha b'Chol Makom Asher Tir'eh Ki Im ba'Makom...''

Question: Does Eliyahu offer at a time of Isur Bamos?!

Answer (R. Simlai): "Uvi'Dvarcha Asisi'' - I did according to Your word.