(Mishnah): If his brother left money, it is used to buy land, and [the Yavam] eats the Peiros. [If he left] detached Peros, it is used to buy land, and the Yavam eats the Peiros;

R. Meir says, we evaluate how much [the land] is worth with Peiros and how much it is worth without Peros. The excess, he buys land (for her) for this amount, and [the Yavam] eats the Peiros;

Chachamim say, attached produce belongs to the Yavam. Detached produce (or money) belongs to whoever takes it;

If the Yavam takes it, he keeps it. If the Yevamah takes it, it is used to buy land, and he eats the Peiros.

If he does Yibum, she is like his wife in all respects, except that her Kesuvah is against her first husband's property.

(Gemara - R. Avahu citing R. Yochanan): [Surely money that the brother left is Meshubad for the Kesuvah! Our Mishnah] needed to teach about [coins] that were deposited with [the Yavam]. He cannot say 'since I am the heir, they are mine.'

(R. Avahu citing R. Yochanan): [Chachamim] do not mean [that attached produce is] his. (It is Meshubad for the Kesuvah!) Rather, for this matter [it is his] - if the heir preempted and seized, we do not take from him.

Question: Is it so even for a creditor (if he seized what was Meshubad for the Kesuvah, we do not take from him)?

Answer #1 (Beraisa): An heir or a creditor - if one of them preempted and seized [what was destined for the other], we take from him.

Rebuttal (and Answer #2 - R. Acha): We learn from the following [Mishnah]. If one was Makdish 90 Maneh, and he owed 100 Maneh, he adds [borrows] another Dinar and redeems the property [and the creditor collects it];

A Dinar is not precise. Rather, it is any amount, lest it look like Hekdesh goes out [to Chulin] without Pidyon.

(R. Avahu citing R. Yochanan): Full Me'ilah applies [to the Hekdesh before Pidyon].

Question: If full Me'ilah applies, it should be redeemed for its value! If it [need not be] redeemed for its value, full Me'ilah should not apply!

Question: What is the case? If it is attached to the ground, [this cannot be, for] is there Me'ilah in land?!

Answer: Rather, it is Kamah (attached crops).

Answer: [There is full Me'ilah,] since if the Gizbar transgressed and seized it, we do not take from him.

Culmination of Answer #2: A Gizbar (Hekdesh) is like an heir. Just like a Gizbar, if the Gizbar transgressed and seized, we do not take from him, also an heir, if an heir transgressed and seized, we do not take from him.

Rebuttal (R. Shmuel citing R. Avahu citing R. Yochanan): (The Mishnah of redeeming Hekdesh need not discuss Kamah.) The same applies to an ox.

Rejection (of rebuttal): (The Mishnah discusses Stam property, which includes land.) Can you say that an ox is land?!

(R. Tanchum bar Mari citing R. Yosi): They made an ox like Hekdesh that was disgraced. (Perhaps seizing does not help; they said that Me'ilah applies to an ox, for Kedushas ha'Guf applies to it. Therefore, we must bring a proof from Kamah, which has only Kedushas Damim.)

Question: Here (the Beraisa) you say that we take from him, and here (the Mishnah) you say that we do not take from him!

Answer: (The Beraisa refers to our Mishnah.) Because we weakened a woman's (Yevamah') rights, that her Kesuvah is only against (collected from) her first husband's property, we strengthened her rights in this matter, that if the heir preempted and seized, we take from him.

Support (Beraisa): If trees were cut, whether old or young, we take from their hands (just like detached Peros. It is used to buy land, which is Meshubadim to her Kesuvah, and the Yavam eats the Peiros. We explained the entire Sugya like MEICHAL HA'MAYIM.)

(Mishnah): He (the Yavam) may not tell her 'your Kesuvah is on the table' (e.g. if he is a moneychanger who has coins on his table). Rather, there is a lien on all his property to pay the Kesuvah;

If he (the Yavam) divorces her, she collects only her Kesuvah. If he remarries her, she is like any other woman, and has [only her original] Kesuvah.

(Gemara - Tosefta 9:1) Question: How can [a Yavam] do [in order to sell property that he inherited from his brother]?

Answer: He does Yibum, divorces her and remarries her, and she writes a receipt for her Kesuvah.

(R. Yosah): This Tosefta means one or the other. [Either he does Yibum, divorces her and remarries her,] or she writes a receipt for her Kesuvah. (Either enables selling the property.)

(R. Ze'ira citing Rav Hamnuna): If he did Yibum, divorced er and remarried her, if he wrote a new Kesuvah to her, [its lien] is against his property. If not, [her Kesuvah's lien] is against the property of her first husband. (This is unlike R. Yosah, who says that when he remarries her, her Kesuvah is against the Yavam's property.)

Question (R. Yosi bei R. Bun citing Rav Chisda): [What is R. Ze'ira's Chidush?] A Mishnah teaches so! If one divorced his wife and remarried her, he remarried on condition that [her Kesuvah is] her first Kesuvah.

Question: Is it necessary to do Yibum, divorce her and remarry her? (It suffices to make a new Kesuvah when he does Yibum!)

Answer: This teaches a Chidush - even if he did Yibum, divorced her and remarried her, [only] if he made a new Kesuvah, it is against his property. If not, her Kesuvah is against her first husband's property. (We explained this like RIDVAZ.)

(R. Ze'ira citing Rav Hamnuna): If an Arusah died, she has no Kesuvah, for she was not permitted to marry a stranger;

Do not say that he is like one who divorced, and she has a Kesuvah. Therefore, he needs to say that she has no Kesuvah. (CHESHEK SHLOMO, Yevamos 4:4) - this is even if he wrote a Kesuvah to her. One might have thought that only a Nesu'ah who died has no Kesuvah, for her husband inherited her, but an Arusah's father inherits her Kesuvah.)

Initially, she would leave her Kesuvah (100 or 200 Zuz) in her father's house. It was light in [her husband's] eyes to divorce her (since the money was out of his hands anyway).

They retracted and enacted that the Kesuvah be by him. Even so, it was light in his eyes to divorce her;

They retracted and enacted that a man take for his wife's Kesuvah cups, bowls and plates [that he needs, so if he will divorce her, he lacks essential Kelim].

Support (Mishnah): He may not tell her 'your Kesuvah is on the table (cups, bowls and plates - SEFER NIR).' Rather, [they made another enactment that] there is a lien on all his property for her Kesuvah.

They retracted and enacted that a man do business with his wife's Kesuvah, for since he does business with his wife's Kesuvah, and he loses (his merchandise if he divorces her), it is difficult in his eyes to divorce her.

Shimon ben Shetach enacted three matters. A man does business with his wife's Kesuvah, children should go to school, and he enacted Tum'ah for glass Kelim.

Question: Didn't R. Ze'ira citing R. Avuna citing R. Yirmeyah say that Yosi ben Yo'ezer Ish Tzereidah and Yosi ben Yochanan Ish Yerushalayim decreed Tum'ah on Chutz la'Aretz and glass Kelim?

R. Yosi says that R. Yehudah bar Tavi [decreed], and R. Yonah says that Yehudah bar Tavi and Shimon ben Shetach decreed about metal Kelim [that were broken and fixed, that they return to their Tum'ah, lest people say that through Tevilah they become Tahor the same day], and Hillel and Shamai decreed about Taharas Yadayim (that Stam hands are considered Tamei).

Answer (R. Yosi bei R. Bun citing R. Levi): So they had [a tradition for this Halachah] in their hands [and they forgot it], and the latter stood and coincided with the intent of the first (made the same decree).

This teaches that anything for which Beis Din is Moser Nefesh, at the end it is fulfilled.

This is like Rava said - "Ki Lo Davar Rek Mikem Ki Hu Chayeichem" - if it (Torah) is empty from you, what is the reason? It is because you do not exert in it;

"Ki Hu Chayeichem" - when is it your life? It is when you exert in it.