A TREE PLANTED FOR A MITZVAH (Yerushalmi Orlah Perek 1 Halachah 1 Daf 2a)
øá çåðà ùàì àúøåâ ùðèòå ìîöåúå îäå ùéäà çééá áòøìä.
Question (Rav Chuna): If an Esrog [tree] was planted for its Mitzvah, is it obligated in Orlah? (Is this like a tree planted for food?)
çæø øá çåðà åàîø àúøåâ ùðèòå ìîöåúå çééá áòøìä.
Answer (Rav Chuna): An Esrog planted for its Mitzvah is obligated in Orlah. (Since it must be permitted to eat it, it is as if it is planted for food. We explained this like OHR SOMAYACH, Hilchos Parah Adumah 11:7)
åìà ëï úðéðï [åé÷øà ëâ î] åì÷çúí ìëí åìà îï äîöåä
Question (Beraisa): "U'Lkachtem Lachem", and not from a Mitzvah (e.g. Kesef Ma'aser. Since a Mitzvah is not "Lachem", also "Arelim Yihyu Lachem" should not apply!)
úîï åì÷çúí ìëí áãîéí ìà îï äîöåä. áøí äëà ëîä ãúéîø âáé ùåôø [áîãáø ëè à] éåí úøåòä éäéä ìëí î"î. åëà [åé÷øà éè ëâ] ùìù ùðéí éäéä ìëí òøìéí ìà éàëì î"î.
Answer: There, "u'Lkachtem Lachem" [means to buy it from your] money, and not from [money of a] Mitzvah. However, here it is like you say about Shofar "Yom Teru'ah Yihyeh Lachem" - in any case. And [also] here, "Shalosh Shanim Yihyeh Lachem Arelim Lo Ye'achel" - in any case.
[ãó â òîåã à (òåæ åäãø)] îä áéðå ìîùîø ôéøåúéå ìòöéí.
Question: What is the difference between this [for a Mitzvah] and one who guards the Peros for wood (who is exempt)?
ëùí ùäåà øåöä áôøéå ëê äåà øåöä áòöå. áøí äëà øåöä äåà áôøéå åàéðå øåöä áòöå.
Answer: [There], just like he wants the Peros, he wants the wood (the wood is primary). However, here he wants the Peros, and does not want the wood [at all].
åòåã îï äãà ãà"ø çðéðà ôøé àí àåîø òöå àéï àãí éåöà áä éãé çåáúå (áçâ) [ö"ì áô' - ñôø îùáéç]
Answer #2: R. Chanina taught "Pri [Etz Hadar]" - if you will say that [it is exempt from Orlah, for], it is considered wood, one is not Yotzei his obligation with its Pri (for he did not take a Pri - MAHARA FULDA)!
îä ãîé ìä
Question: What resembles this?
æéú ùðèòå ìäãìé÷ áå áçðåëä.
Answer #1: An olive [tree] that he planted in order to light with [its oil] on Chanukah.
à"ø éåñé áø áåï æä ãáø úåøä åæä îãáøéäï åàú àîø äëéï.
Objection (R. Yosi): This (Esrog) is mid'Oraisa, and this (Chanukah) is mid'Rabanan, and you say so (that they resemble each other)?!
îä ãîé ìä æéú ùðèòå ìäãìé÷ áå àú äîðåøä æä ãáø úåøä åæä ãáø úåøä.
Answer #2: What resembles this? An olive [tree] that he planted in order to light the Menorah. Both of these are mid'Oraisa.
A TREE PLANTED PARTIALLY FOR A FENCE (Yerushalmi Orlah Perek 1 Halachah 1 Daf 2a)
ø"ù áï é÷éí áòà ÷åîé øáé éåçðï ðèòå öã äúçúåï ìñééâ åäòìéåï ìîàëì. öã äúçúåï ìîàëì åäòìéåï ìñééâ.
Question (R. Shimon ben Yakim, to R. Yochanan): If he planted [with intent that] the lower part be for a fence, and the upper part for food, or the lower part for food, and the upper part for a fence, [what is the law]?
à"ì äéà äãà äéà äãà. äéà öã äúçúåï ìñééâ åäòìéåï ìîàëì. äéà öã äòìéåï ìñééâ åäúçúåï ìîàëì.
Answer (R. Yochanan): These are the same. When the lower part is for a fence, and the upper part is for food, the law is the same as when the upper part for a fence, and the lower part is for food. (What is for food is obligated, and what is for a fence is exempt.)
ëéöã äåà éåãò
Question: How does one know [which part is for a fence, and which is for food - GRA]?
àîø øáé éåðä îáéà æîåøä åîñééí òã ëàï ìñééâ îëàï åàéìê ìîàëì.
Answer (R. Yonah): He brings a branch and marks - until here is for a fence, and from here and onwards is for food.
ø"æ áòé ðéçà öã äúçúåï ìñééâ åäòìéåï ìîàëì. öã äúçúåï ìîàëì åäòìéåï ìñééâ âãì îúåê àéñåø åàú àîøú äëéï.
Question (R. Ze'ira): Granted, if the lower part is for a fence, and the upper part is for food [the bottom is exempt. However,] if the upper part for a fence, and the lower part is for food, [what is now above] grew [below] b'Isur, and you say so (it is exempt)?!
ø"æ ëãòúéä [ãó â òîåã á (òåæ åäãø)] ãàîø ø"æ áùí øáé éåðúï áöì ùì ëìàé äëøí ùò÷øå åùúìå àôéìå îåñéó ëîä àñåø ùàéï âéãåìé àéñåø îòìéï àú äàéñåø.
Remark: R. Ze'ira holds like he taught elsewhere, for R. Ze'ira said in the name of R. Yochanan, an onion of Kil'ai ha'Kerem that was uprooted and planted, even if it grew much (the Shi'ur for Bitul, i.e. 200 times the size of what was planted, permitted) growth of (i.e. that comes out of) Isur is not Mevatel the Isur. (Also here, what grows above b'Heter is not Mevatel what grew below, b'Isur.)