If one planted for a fence, and [later] intended for food, it comes [to be obligated] through intent. [If one planted] for food, and intended for a fence, he cannot [exempt from Orlah through intent].

If one planted [with intent that] the first year it is for a fence, and from then and onwards it will be for food, since he intended an intent of Chiyuv, it is obligated (from the beginning).

Question (Mishnah - R. Yosi): Even if he said 'the inner will be for food, and the outer for a fence', the inner are obligated and the outer are exempt. (Also when he intended initially for a fence, we should say that what grew in a state of exemption (the first year) is exempt, and afterwards it is obligated!)

Answer: There [is different], for [what is] for food is always for food, [and what is] for a fence is always for a fence. However, here, since he mixed in intent for Chiyuv, it is obligated [from the beginning. We explained this like MAHARA FULDA.]

Question: If one planted to be a fence for three years, and afterwards he intended for food, what is the law of additional growth?

Answer #1 (R. Yirmeyah): The addition is exempt.

Answer #2 (R. Ba): The addition is obligated.

(R. Yosi): R. Yirmeyah's opinion seems to be difficult [unlike Chachamim], but this is not so; really, it is fine;

This is like it was taught, a field that [its Peros] grew a third in front of a Nochri (while he owned it), and a Yisrael bought it, R. Akiva says, the addition is exempt [from Ma'aseros]. Chachamim say, the addition is obligated;

[That is for Ma'aser, but] here (for Orlah) the initial growth is exempt, and the addition is exempt.

If one planted the first three years for a fence, and from here and onwards intended for food, R. Yochanan says, R. Yishmael says that anything that has no Orlah, it has no Revai.

Question (R. Yochanan): Must it have three years of Orlah [in order to have Revai, or is it enough if Orlah applied for part of the time? TAL TORAH - he can hold like above, that if he planted with intent for a fence for one year, and afterwards it will be for food, it is obligated from the beginning. If he planted with intent for a fence permanently, and later intended for food, it is obligated only from when he intended for food.]

(R. Yonah): [R. Yochanan] asked about the primary law of Orlah - [perhaps] the primary law of Orlah cannot be less than three years (if it was exempt for part of them, it is totally exempt).

(R. Yosi): He asked about the primary law of Revai - [perhaps] anything that does not have [the full three years] of Orlah does not have Revai.