(Beraisa): If he hit both [possible fathers] at once, or he cursed both of them at once, he is liable; R. Yehudah exempts.

Question (R. Yochanan): R. Yehudah contradicts himself!

(Mishnah): If one ate a k'Zayis of this (the left Gid ha'Nasheh) and a k'Zayis of this (the right Gid ha'Nasheh), he is lashed 80 times (both are forbidden);

R. Yehudah says, he is lashed only 40 (he is unsure which is forbidden).

Answer (R. Kruspi): He does not contradict himself. There, the primary Lav if a Safek (we must say that one is lashed for eating both. If not, one is never lashed for it!) Here, the Lav is Vadai, just he had a Safek.

Question (R. Yudah): If so, if Neveilah became Batel in Shechutah, since it was Vadai, and he had a Safek, if he ate from both (at once) he should be exempt!

Answer (R. Yosi): R. Yehudah agrees about all other Sefekos, that he is liable. However, here he expounds verses;

R. Yehudah expounds "Aviv" - Vadai, and not a Safek. "Imo" - Vadai, and not a Safek.

(Mishnah): He ascends with the Mishmar of this and of this.

Question: He should not ascend! (Just like they reject him from receiving a portion, they should reject him from Avodah!)

Answer (R. Acha citing R. Chinena citing R. Yosa): It is due to blemish to the family (lest people say that he is Pasul for Avodah. Therefore, he serves with both.)

(Beraisa): (Our Mishnah taught that if they are from the same Mishmar, he receives one portion.) This is when both [possible fathers] are from the same Beis Av (each Mishmar is divided into six Batei Av. Each weekday, one Beis Av does the Avodah. If they are from different Batei Av, each tells him 'perhaps you are from the other Beis Av.')

(Mishnah): The Mitzvah of Chalitzah is with three judges, even if all are commoners;

If Chalitzah was done with a Min'al (a soft leather shoe), it is Kesherah. If it was done with Ampiliya (a slipper or sock), it is Pasul. If it was done with a sandal that has a heel, it is Kesherah; if it has no heel, it is Pasul;

From the knee and below, it is Kesherah; from the knee and above, it is Pasul;

(Gemara) Question: It says "Zekenim", and you say that [the judges can be] commoners?!

Answer: The Mitzvah [l'Chatchilah] is with Chachamim.

Question: What is the source that [b'Di'eved, it is Kosher] even with commoners?

Answer: "Chalutz ha'Na'al" - in any case.

Some teach that Chalitzah with [judges who are] converts is Kosher, and some teach that Chalitzah with converts is Pasul;

The one who says that Chalitzah with converts is Kosher is like the one who expounds "b'Yisrael" to include converts. The one who says that Chalitzah with converts is Pasul is like the one who expounds "b'Yisrael" to exclude converts.

Question: Here you say that ["b'Yisrael"] excludes converts and here (regarding Sukah,) you say that it includes converts!

Answer: There (Sukah), "ha'Ezrach" excludes converts, and b'Yisrael excludes converts. An exclusion after an exclusion includes converts. However, here (Chalitzah, there is only one exclusion, so) b'Yisrael excludes converts!

Some teach that Chalitzah with two [judges] is Pasul, and some teach that Chalitzah with two is Kosher;

Assumption: The one who says that Chalitzah with two is Pasul, this is like the opinion that Chalitzah with converts is Pasul. The one who says that Chalitzah with two is Kosher, this is like the opinion that Chalitzah with converts is Kosher.

Rejection: Even the one who says that Chalitzah with converts is Kosher, he agrees that says that Chalitzah with two is Pasul, for monetary cases are Kosher with [judges who are] converts and Pasul with two [judges].

Some teach that Chalitzah at night is Kosher, and some teach that Chalitzah at night is Pasul;

Assumption: The one who says that Chalitzah at night is Kosher, this is like the opinion that Chalitzah with converts is Kosher. The one who says that Chalitzah at night is Pasul, this is like the opinion that Chalitzah with converts is Pasul.

Rejection: Even the one who says that Chalitzah with converts is Kosher, he agrees that says that Chalitzah at night is Pasul, for monetary cases are Kosher with converts and Pasul at night.

Some teach that the judges must know how to recite [the verses], and some teach even if they do not know how to recite;

The one who says even if they do not know how to recite, this was before they found a support from a verse [that the judges recite, and the woman repeats]. The one who says they must know how to recite, this is after they found a support from a verse;

"V'Ansah v'Amrah" - answering is only from another's mouth (another said it first).

(R. Yosi): It must be [that she repeats what she heard] from the judge's mouth.

We do not do so. (Rather, she repeats even what she heard from someone else.)