Question: Granted, [one may save] the case of a Sefer with the Sefer. [Why may one save] the case of Tefilin with the Tefilin, even if there are coins inside? (The case was a Basis only for Isur!)

Answer #1: This is like R. Yakov bar Acha said in the name of Chinena Kartigna'ah citing R. Hoshayah - a leather bag with coins in it, one puts a loaf on it and moves it [with the loaf. Also here, one puts the Tefilin in the case and moves it with the Tefilin.]

Answer #2 (R. Chagai citing Ze'ira): We learn from "Choneh Mal'ach Hash-m Saviv li'Yre'av va'Ychaltzem.'' (One may even bring a case with coins in order to save the Tefilin. If one would need to cast out the coins first, meanwhile perhaps the Tefilin will burn! We explained this like NO'AM YERUSHALMI.)

Support: It says also "Beidayin Guvriya Ilech Kefiso b'Sarbeleihon...'' (Hash-m saved Chananyah, Misha'el and Azaryah, and their clothes).

(Mishnah): To where may we [take them to] save them? To a Mavuy that is not Mefulash.

Question: This implies that one may not save to [another house in a] Mavuy Mefulash (a Karmelis). Everywhere, you say that one who walks is not like one who does Hanachah, and here, you [are stringent about Kisvei ha'Kodesh, and forbid from Reshus ha'Yachid to Reshus ha'Yachid via Karmelis. You must] say that one who walks is like one who does Hanachah [in Karmelis]!

Answer: Rather, [we discuss one who can save only] through throwing.

Question: There, you say [according to Chachamim, whom the Halachah follows] that one who throws [from Reshus ha'Yachid to Reshus ha'Yachid via Reshus ha'Rabim] is exempt, and here you say that he is liable! (If not, it is unreasonable to forbid throwing through Karmelis.)

Answer (R. Chizkiyah citing R. Acha): We discuss when they did not make an Eruv (so a Mavuy Mefulash resembles Reshus ha'Rabim. We explained this like PNEI MOSHE.)

Ben Beseira [permits even to a Mavuy Mefulash. He holds] like R. Yehudah;

(Mishnah Eruvin 9:5): Bridges [whose sides descend and make walls] Mefulashim, one may carry under them on Shabbos. R. Yehudah says so. Chachamim forbid. Further, R. Yehudah said that one may be Me'arev in a Mavuy Mefulash; Chachamim forbid. (We explained this like SHA'AREI TORAS ERETZ YISRAEL.)

Note: Why does our Gemara cite the Reisha of that Mishnah? Perhaps it is to teach that R. Yehudah holds that mid'Oraisa, two walls make Reshus ha'Yachid. We should not say that he permits to be Me'arev because the Lechi or Korah on each end is a proper Mechitzah, but without this, it is Reshus ha'Rabim.

(Mishnah): One may save three meals of food. What is proper for people one saves for people. What is proper for animals one saves for animals.

How is this? If the fire was on Shabbos night, one may save three meals. If it was on Shabbos morning, one may save two meals. If it was on Shabbos afternoon, one may save one meal;

R. Yosi says, no matter when it was, one may save three meals.

(Gemara - R. Bun bar Chiya citing R. Ba bar Mamal): Our Mishnah is R. Nechemyah, who says that one may take [on Shabbos] only something needed [for Shabbos].

(R. Yosah): (It is even like Rabanan.) Rabanan's reason there [to permit taking Kelim not needed for Shabbos] is because everything in the house is Muchan. However, here, if you say so (one may save as much as he wants), he will save today for tomorrow [and may come to extinguish - PNEI MOSHE].

Inference: Our Mishnah is R. Hundakas, who says that on Shabbos we eat four meals. (Therefore, on Shabbos night, i.e. after the meal, one may save three meals, in the morning he save two, and in the afternoon he saves one.)

Rejection: (It is like Rabanan.) The case is, the fire erupted on Shabbos night before he ate (and similarly regarding the morning and afternoon).

Question: On Yom Kipur, what can you say? [Since he may not eat the entire day,] according to Rabanan, one may not save at all?! (After the fast he will need to pursue food?! Granted, according to R. Yosi, just like he always saves three meals, we can say that the same applies to Yom Kipur.)

Answer: All agree that he may save food for [at least] one meal, due to danger [lest he be weak, and unable to get food].

(Beraisa): One may save for a Choleh (sick person) or minor like for an average person, and for a glutton according to his [normal amount of] food.

We are Me'arev for a Choleh or minor according to his food, and for a glutton like for an average person.

(Beraisa): If one saved clean bread, he may not save inferior (bran) bread. If he saved inferior bread, he may save clean bread, and one may not scheme [to save inferior bread, and afterwards decide that he wants clean bread]. R. Yosi bar R. Yehudah says, one may scheme.

Some teach that one may save [extra food for the sake of guests], and afterwards invite. And some teach that one must invite, and [only] afterwards he may save [for the guests].

The one who says that one saves and afterwards invites, he holds like the one who permits scheming. The one who says that one invites, and afterwards saves, he holds like the one who forbids scheming.