Rashi's opinion: We permit giving clothes to a Nochri launderer because it is not recognized that it is of a Yisrael.

R. Tam's opinion: There is no distinction. It is permitted during the Moed and on Shabbos.

Source #1: A water mill makes noise, yet we permit it [on Shabbos] in Shabbos (18a);

Source #2: In Avodah Zarah (21b) we permit renting a field to a Nochri, for he does his sharecropping. (He is not working for the Yisrael);

All the more so Kablanus is permitted, for this does not improve the house, just he finishes quicker.

Implied question: R. Shimon ben Gamliel disagrees!

Answer: Presumably, the Halachah follows R. Shimon ben Gamliel, who forbids a bathhouse in the Mishnah;

Inference: A field is permitted, like we infer there;

Support: A Beraisa (Shabbos 19a) says that [one who goes] on a ship stipulates that they will cease on Shabbos, and [we are not concerned if] they do not cease.

Inference: The Nochri need not cease his Kablanus due to the Yisrael.

Some say that one need not even stipulate [that they will cease].

R. Tam's opinion: In our Sugya, Shmuel forbids. All these teachings refer to an Avel;

This is like Rav Shisha, who said that things permitted during Chol ha'Moed are forbidden during Avelus, for it is mid'Oraisa, or like mid'Oraisa. However, Chachamim were lenient about Chol ha'Moed;

All the more so we should be lenient about Shabbos. We are not so concerned lest people disgrace it.

Question: Since Shmuel discusses Avelus, how can [the Gemara] say that if there is not no city nearby, we said [that it is permitted] only on Shabbos and Yom Tov, for people do not commonly go there, but it is forbidden during Chol ha'Moed? This requires investigation.

Explanation: Regarding oil, R. Yehudah's opinion was taught first. Once we began R. Yosi's opinion, we finish it.

Question: Regarding wine, I do not know whether "he corks" refers to the pit or the barrel.

Suggestion: Seemingly, it refers to the barrel, to which corking applies.

Retraction: "Zolef v'Gomer" connotes that it refers to the pit. This does not apply to a barrel! This connotes that after [he directs wine from the pit into a barrel, he finishes, i.e.] he corks [the barrel]." (Based on Tosfos ha'Rosh.)

Support: Also "he makes for it planks" connotes that it refers to the pit. He (R. Yehudah) disagrees with [R. Yosi's Heter] "Zolef v'Gomer." Planks do not apply to a barrel. A small cover suffices for it.

Explanation (Tosfos ha'Rav): Gathering Peros is a Melachah, like it says in Chagigah 18a;

Citation (18a): Why is it called Chag ha'Asif? Is gathering permitted during the Moed?!

Question: I do not know what Melachah is gathering Peros.

Suggestion: This requires investigation, if exertion without Melachah is forbidden, just like business.

Support: Below (13a) we say "[matters are forbidden during the] Moed due to exertion. This is not an exertion."

Rejection (of Support): Perhaps this is only regarding something that is Melachah.

Explanation: This is because he did an Isur (made a blemish). One who intentionally left his Melachah to do it during the Moed did not yet do an Isur.

[Therefore] we need not emend the text to say "[Isur] mid'Oraisa" [to explain why blemishing is more stringent].

However, in Gitin (44a), regarding one who sold [an Eved Kena'ani to a Nochri] and died, we asked whether or not we fined the son after him. There, surely the text says "Isur mid'Oraisa", for also one who sold and died did an Isur [just like one who blemished], but it is not mid'Oraisa. (Therefore, perhaps it is more lenient than one who blemished.)