(Mishnah): If the nuts broke, the pomegranates were cleaved, the barrels were opened, the gourds were cut, or the loaves were sliced, they are Batel in 201.

(Gemara): If [the nuts] fell and afterwards broke, whether this was Shogeg or Mezid, they are not Batel. R. Meir says so;

R. Yehudah says, this was Shogeg or Mezid, they are Batel.

R. Yosi says, if they fell b'Shogeg, they are Batel; b'Mezid, they are not Batel.

What is the reason of R. Meir? They fined Shogeg due to Mezid. (If you will say that b'Shogeg it is permitted, people will do so b'Mezid, and say that they were Shogeg.)

What is the reason of R. Yehudah? He already was 'fined' (they are not as esteemed as they were).

Question: What is the reason of R. Yosi?

Answer: It is like R. Avahu citing R. Yochanan said - all Isurim [that became mixed], if one added [Heter so that now there is a Shi'ur of Bitul], b'Shogeg it is permitted, b'Mezid it is forbidden.

(Reish Lakish citing R. Hoshayah): If there were 150 [sealed] barrels in front of him (and one was of Terumah), if 100 were opened, the 100 are permitted and 50 are forbidden. The other [50], when they will be opened, they will be permitted;

(R. Zeira): They said [that they will be permitted] only when they will be opened [by themselves], but l'Chatchilah, it is forbidden to open them.

Question (the academy of R. Yanai): If one a gourd was stricken (shriveled) while it was attached, is it Tovel for Ma'aser (forbid even Arai before tithing?)

Question (Levi): Does it receive Tum'as Ochlim [while attached]? Since it was stricken, is it as if it was cut (detached), or not?

Answer: Shmuel's teaching shows that it receives Tum'as Ochlim;

(R. Yosi bei R. Bun citing Shmuel): If figs and grapes shriveled while attached, they receive Tum'as Ochlim, and [in another respect they are attached, for] one who detaches them on Shabbos is liable for reaping.

Inference: Our Mishnah [said or the loaves were sliced...;] it is like R. Akiva, for R. Akiva said, even, loaves of a Ba'al ha'Bayis (are Mekadesh).