ESTEEMED SPECIES THAT LOST THEIR IMPORTANCE (Yerushalmi Orlah Perek 3 Halachah 6 Daf 19b)
îúðé' ðúôöòå äàâåæéí ðúôøãå äøéîåðéí ðôúçå äçáéåú ðçúëå äãìåòéï ðúôøùå äëëøåú éòìå áàçã åîàúéí:
(Mishnah): If the nuts broke, the pomegranates were cleaved, the barrels were opened, the gourds were cut, or the loaves were sliced, they are Batel in 201.
âî' ðôìå åàçø ëê ðúôöòå áéï ùåââ áéï îæéã ìà éòìå ãáøé øáé îàéø.
(Gemara): If [the nuts] fell and afterwards broke, whether this was Shogeg or Mezid, they are not Batel. R. Meir says so;
øáé éåãä àåîø áéï ùåââ áéï îæéã éòìå.
R. Yehudah says, this was Shogeg or Mezid, they are Batel.
øáé éåñé àåîø ùåââ éòìå îæéã ìà éòìå.
R. Yosi says, if they fell b'Shogeg, they are Batel; b'Mezid, they are not Batel.
îä èòîà ãøáé îàéø ÷ðñå áùåââ îôðé îæéã.
What is the reason of R. Meir? They fined Shogeg due to Mezid. (If you will say that b'Shogeg it is permitted, people will do so b'Mezid, and say that they were Shogeg.)
îä èòîà ãøáé éåãä (ñáø) [ëáø] ÷ðñå áéãå.
What is the reason of R. Yehudah? He already was 'fined' (they are not as esteemed as they were).
îä èòîà ãøáé éåñé
Question: What is the reason of R. Yosi?
ëéé ãàîø øáé àáäå áùí øáé éåçðï ëì äàéñåøéï ùøéáä òìéäï ùåââ îåúø îæéã àñåø.
Answer: It is like R. Avahu citing R. Yochanan said - all Isurim [that became mixed], if one added [Heter so that now there is a Shi'ur of Bitul], b'Shogeg it is permitted, b'Mezid it is forbidden.
øáé ùîòåï áï ì÷éù áùí øáé äåùòéà äéå ìôðéå îàä åçîùéí çáéåú ðúôúçå îàä [îàä] îåúøåú çîùéí àñåøåú åäùàø ìëùéôúçå éäå îåúøåú.
(Reish Lakish citing R. Hoshayah): If there were 150 [sealed] barrels in front of him (and one was of Terumah), if 100 were opened, the 100 are permitted and 50 are forbidden. The other [50], when they will be opened, they will be permitted;
àîø øáé æòéøà ìà àîøå àìà ìëùéôúçå äà ìôúåç ìëúçìä àñåø.
(R. Zeira): They said [that they will be permitted] only when they will be opened [by themselves], but l'Chatchilah, it is forbidden to open them.
ãáé (øáé) ø' éðàé ùàìéï ãìòú ùì÷ä àáéä îäå ùúèáåì ìîòùøåú.
Question (the academy of R. Yanai): If one a gourd was stricken (shriveled) while it was attached, is it Tovel for Ma'aser (forbid even Arai before tithing?)
ìåé ùàì îäå ùúèîà èåîàú àåëìéï. [ãó ë òîåã à] (ùì÷ä ëîçåúëú äéà) [ö''ì ëéåï ùì÷úä ëîçåúëú äéà àå ìà - ø''ù ñéøéìéå]
Question (Levi): Does it receive Tum'as Ochlim [while attached]? Since it was stricken, is it as if it was cut (detached), or not?
îéìúéä ãùîåàì [ãùîåàì] àîø ùäéà îèîà èåîàú àåëìéï.
Answer: Shmuel's teaching shows that it receives Tum'as Ochlim;
(åàîø) [ö''ì ãàîø - ø''ù ñéøéìéå] øáé éåñé áé øáé áåï áùí ùîåàì úàðéí åòðáéí ùöéî÷å áàáéäï îèîàéï èåîàú àåëìéï [ãó îà òîåã à (òåæ åäãø)] åäøåãä îäï áùáú çééá îùåí ÷åöø: ðúôøñå ëëøåú.
(R. Yosi bei R. Bun citing Shmuel): If figs and grapes shriveled while attached, they receive Tum'as Ochlim, and [in another respect they are attached, for] one who detaches them on Shabbos is liable for reaping.
îúðé' ãø' ò÷éáä ãø' ò÷éáä àîø àó ëëøåú ùì áòì äáéú:
Inference: Our Mishnah [said or the loaves were sliced...;] it is like R. Akiva, for R. Akiva said, even, loaves of a Ba'al ha'Bayis (are Mekadesh).