(R. Lazar citing R. Hoshayah): Since Kodshim Kalim and Ma'aser Sheni were eaten anywhere that one can see [Shilo], the [Tana] who taught [our Mishnah] did not need to warn about eating them, only about offering [Kodshim];

What is the reason? "Hishamer Lecha Pen Ta'aleh Olasecha" - this is like Pen Ta'aleh Aliyasecha.

Question (R. Shimon ben Maisha to R. Lazar): What is [a place from which] one can see - he can see Shilo, or Shilo and the Mishkan of Shilo?

Answer (R. Lazar): It is Shilo and the Mishkan of Shilo, like Beis Me'on (it was proper to see them from there), just this (Beis Me'on) has an obstruction [blocking seeing them,] and this (a place Kosher for eating) has no obstruction.

(R. Yosah citing R. Yochanan): This is a Siman - as long as the Aron is inside [the place where we offer, e.g. the Ohel Mo'ed, Shilo or Beis ha'Mikdash], Bamos are forbidden. If it left (e.g. in Nov and Giv'on, the Aron was in Kiryat Ye'arim), Bamos are permitted.

Question (R. Zeirah to R. Yosah): Is this even if [the Aron left] temporarily, like the case [when it was taken to war in the days] of Eli?

(R. Avahu citing R. Yochanan): (A Mishnah teaches that when the Mishkan was in Nov and Giv'on, Kodshim Kalim could be eaten in all cities of Yisrael. It did not say so about Ma'aser Sheni. This implies that they were eaten only in Nov and Giv'on!) We learn from a Gezeirah Shavah "Sham-Sham" - just like Sham [regarding Pesach] is forbidden on Bamos (i.e. outside of Nov and Giv'on, also) here Bamos are forbidden (one may not eat Ma'aser Sheni in other cities of Yisrael).

Question (Reish Lakish in front of R. Yochanan): If so, if there is no Aron [there, e.g. in Nov and Giv'on], Pesach is not [eaten anywhere else, and similarly other Kodshim]? (We explain this like ha'Gaon Rav C. Kanievsky, Shlita.)

Answer (R. Yosi bei R. Ba): [Rather, R. Yochanan learns Ma'aser Sheni] from a Gezeirah Shavah "Azkarah-Azkarah" - just like Azkarah mentioned there, Bamos are forbidden, also here Bamos are forbidden (one may not eat Ma'aser Sheni in other cities).

Support: Also R. Yehudah and R. Shimon say that Ma'aser Sheni was eaten [only] in Nov and Giv'on [when the Mishkan was there].

Question: This is fine according to R. Yehudah. R. Yehudah says that an individual offers Chatas and Pesach on a Bamah Gedolah, but not on a Bamah Ketanah. (Likewise, Ma'aser Sheni may not be eaten elsewhere);

However, according to R. Shimon, who says that even the Tzibur brings [on a Bamah Gedolah] only obligations that the Torah fixed [what is the source to obligate bringing Ma'aser Sheni to Nov and Giv'on]?

Answer: R. Shimon holds that once it was fixed [in the days of Shilo that one must bring Ma'aser Sheni to the place of the Mishkan], it never ceased.

Question: What is the source that Kohanim can be Yotzei [the Mitzvah of Matzah] on Pesach through Chalah and Terumah, and Yisrael through Ma'aser Sheni?

Answer: It says "Tochlu Matzos" to include [these].

Suggestion: Perhaps [Kohanim] can be Yotzei through Bikurim!

Rejection: "B'Chol Moshvoseichem Tochlu Matzos" refers to Matzah that can be eaten in any Moshav (settlement). It excludes Bikurim, which are not eaten in any Moshav.

Question: [We said that Yisraelim are Yotzei with] Ma'aser Sheni. Is it eaten in any Moshav?!

Answer: It can be redeemed and eaten in any Moshav.

Question (R. Bun bar Chiyah): If so, what was bought with Kesef [money used to redeem] Ma'aser Sheni Tamei, according to R. Yehudah, who says that it cannot be redeemed and eaten in any Moshav, one should not be Yotzei through it!

Question (Reish Lakish): If so, Chalah of a dough of Ma'aser Sheni in Yerushalayim, since it cannot be redeemed and eaten in any Moshav, one should not be Yotzei through it! (One may not redeem Tahor Ma'aser in Yerushalayim. If it becomes Tamei, it may not be eaten, for it is Chalah.)

Suggestion: Perhaps one is Yotzei through Chalos Todah and Rekikei Nazir!

Rejection: "Shiv'as Yamim Matzos Tochelu" refers to Matzah that is eaten all seven days. This excludes Chalos Todah and Rekikei Nazir, which may not be eaten all seven days.

(R. Yonah citing Reish Lakish): From this that Chalos Todah and Rekikei Nazir were eaten in all cities of Yisrael [when Bamos were permitted, e.g. when the Mishkan was in Nov and Giv'on], the Tana could not exclude them from Moshav. (Rather, he needed to expound what is made to eat for seven days.)

Inference (R. Yosah citing Reish Lakish): This teaches that Chalos Todah and Rekikei Nazir were eaten in all cities of Yisrael. [This is why] the Tana could not exclude them from Moshav.

Question: It is fine for Chalos Todah [they were times when they were eaten in all cities of Yisrael. However,] Rekikei Nazir - R. Yochanan taught that [one may not offer on a Bamah Korbanos] Nezirus, [for once one became a Nazir, the Korbanos] are an obligation!

Answer #1 (R. Bun bar Kahana): We can answer that he offered his Chatas in Shilo, and his Olah and Shelamim (which are Nedavos) in Nov or Giv'on (and then he brought the Rekikim).

Objection (R. Ezra, to R. Mana): Didn't Rebbi say in the name of R. Yosah that Shalmei Chagigah brought on a Bamah are Kosher, just the owner did not fulfill his Chiyuv? (Likewise, Shalmei Nazir offered on a Bamah is not considered Korban Nazir, and Rekikim are not brought with it!)

Answer: It is like R. Yehudah, for R. Yehudah taught that an individual may offer Chatas and Pesach on a Bamah Gedolah, but not on a Bamah Ketanah. (All other obligations, including Korbanos Nazir, are Kosher on a Bamah Ketanah.)

Answer #2: Rather, it is like R. Shimon, for R. Shimon says, once one of the bloods was thrown, the Nazir may drink wine and become Tamei. (Therefore, once he offered one, e.g. the Chatas, the others (Olah and Shelamim) are like Nedavos, which are Kosher on a Bamah.)

(Beraisa #1): ["Ki Lo Vasem... El ha'Menuchah v'El ha'Nachalah" -] Menuchah is Shilo, and Nachalah is Yerushalayim.

(Beraisa #2): Menuchah is Yerushalayim, and Nachalah is Shilo.

The one who says that Menuchah is Shilo learns from "Ki Lo Vasem Ad Atah El ha'Menuchah." Nachalah is Yerushalayim, for it says "ha'Ayit Tzavu'a Nachalasi Li."

The one who says that Nachalah is Shilo learns from "Haysah Li Nachalasi k'Arye va'Ya'ar." Menuchah is Yerushalayim, for it says Zos Menuchasi Adei Ad..."

[Even though it was destroyed, it is called eternal, for there is no other place to offer after it was chosen. A parable for this is] one who made a bundle, and rested [after he made it, even though he still needs to transport it];

So [with erection of] the Ohel Mo'ed, Bamos were forbidden. In Gilgal, Bamos were permitted. In Shilo, Bamos were forbidden. In Nov and Giv'on, Bamos were permitted. In Yerushalayim, Bamos were forbidden [permanently];

[A parable for this is] a king who told his slave "do not drink wine, not from Tiverya and not from Kisarin and not from Tziporin." In between [these places], he is permitted;

So in the Ohel Mo'ed they [had the Mishkan] for 39 [years]. It was 14 in Gilgal - the seven years of conquering [Eretz Yisrael], and the seven years of dividing it (among the tribes);

In Shilo they were 369 years, and 57 in Nov and Giv'on - 13 in Nochri, and 44 in Giv'on;

In Yerushalayim they were 410 years in Bayis Rishon, and 420 years in Bayis Sheni, to fulfill "Gadol Yihyeh Kevod ha'Bayis ha'Zeh ha'Acharon Min ha'Rishon."