Answer #2 (Nasan bar Hoshayah, to the contradiction between our Mishnah and the Mishnah in Makos, on Amud A): Here [our Mishnah] discusses a Na'arah. There (the Mishnah in Makos) discusses a Bogeres;

A Na'arah has a fine, and there are no lashes for her. A Bogeres has lashes, but she has no fine, and no Boshes and Pegam.

Answer #3 (Rabanan of Kisarin): The case [that he is lashed is when], he enticed her, until she pardoned to him Boshes and Pegam.

Nasan bar Hoshayah holds that in a case of lashes and money, he pays and he is not lashed.

Question: He should be lashed and pay!

Answer: "Kedei Rish'aso" - you obligate him for one evil. You do not obligate him for two evils.

Question: He should pay and not be lashed, like Edim Zomemin! Just like you say there that Edim Zomemin pay and are lashed, here he should pay and not be lashed!

Answer (R. Yonah): R. Nasan bar Hoshayah expound Kedei Rish'aso - [it says "v'Hipilu ha'Shofet v'Hikahu"] one whose lashes fulfill [all the punishment due for] his evil. It excludes this one, that we tell him 'go pay.'