(Mishnah): At the time our ancestors came to the land and found [a tree] planted, it was exempt.

If they planted, even though they did not conquer [Eretz Yisrael yet], it is obligated.

One who plants for the Rabim is obligated; R. Yehudah exempts.

One who plants in Reshus ha'Rabim, and a Nochri who planted, and a Gazlan who planted, and one who plants in a boat, and what grows by itself, is obligated in Orlah.

(Gemara): "U'Ntatem'' excludes what Nochrim planted before Yisrael came to the land

Inference (Rav Huna citing R. Aba): (It is exempt even if it was planted just before Yisrael entered.) This teaches that an exempt root [totally] exempts.

If they planted, even though they did not conquer [Eretz Yisrael yet], it is obligated.

Question: According to R. Yishmael, who says that every "Bi'ah'' said in the Torah (when you will come to Eretz Yisrael) discusses after 14 years - seven in which [Bnei Yisrael] conquered [Eretz Yisrael], and seven in which they divided it (among the Shevatim - does he argue with our Mishnah)?!

Answer (R. Heila citing R. Lazar): R. Yishmael agrees about Chalah and Orlah.

Support (Beraisa): [It says about Chalah] "b'Vo'achem'' - because the Torah changed the expression (elsewhere it says "Ki Savo'u''), Chachamim changed its obligation (it applies immediately after entering. Regarding Orlah, "Kol Etz'' includes what was planted immediately after entering.)

Question (R. Yonah): R. Yishmael contradicts himself! There he says Havayah and Hakamah (written about redemption - "k'Erkecha ha'Kohen Ken Yihyeh'' and "Ka'asher Ya'arich Oso ha'Kohen Ken Yakum'') are the same, Shevirah and Netitzah ("v'Nitatztem Es Mizbechosam v'Shibartem Es Matzevosam'') are the same, and Ge'ulah and Pediyah ("u'Fadah b'Erkecha'' and "v'Im Lo Yiga'el'') are the same, and here he distinguishes between one expression and another?!

One who plants for the Rabim is obligated; R. Yehudah exempts.

Question: Rabanan contradict themselves! There they say that [houses in] Yerushalayim and Chutz la'Aretz do not receive Tum'as Nega'im (Yerushalayim does not, for it was not given to one Shevet, rather, it belongs to all the Shevatim, so it is not "Lachem''), and here they say so (one who plants for the Rabim is obligated, i.e. this is called Lachem)?!

Answer: There "u'Va Asher Lo ha'Bayis'' excludes Yerushalayim, for it is to all the Shevatim. However, here it says "u'Ntatem'' - in any case.

Question: R. Yehudah contradicts himself! There, he said 'I heard only the Beis ha'Mikdash (that Nig'ei Batim do not apply there)', and here he says so (one who plants for the Rabim is obligated, i.e. this is called Lachem)?!

Answer #1: There, he said 'I heard only the Beis ha'Mikdash' - he said what he heard. However, here he himself said so (about Orlah).

Answer #2 (R. Yosi bei R. Bun): [Also he holds like he heard about Nega'im. Tana'im argue about his opinion about Orlah. Our Mishnah] is like R. Shimon ben Elazar;

(Beraisa - R. Shimon ben Elazar citing R. Yehudah): One who plants for the Rabim is obligated in Orlah. What grows by itself is exempt from Orlah. (He argues with Chachamim about the latter.)

One who plants for the Rabim, it is obligated; in Reshus ha'Rabim, it is exempt.

One who plants for the Rabim, it is obligated, when he plants in his [property]; in Reshus ha'Rabim for the sake of the Rabim, it is exempt, when he stole land. (We explained this like MEICHAL HA'MAYIM.)

Question: Can one steal land?!

Answer (R. Heila): Even though land cannot be stolen, there is despair from land (therefore it is like his, and it is obligated - MAHARA FULDA).

R. Yoshiyah brought young trees from Chutz la'Aretz with the earth [in which they were rooted], and planted them in Eretz Yisrael.

(R. Yonah): He did so (brought them with their earth) to profit years (so the years of Orlah will not begin again when he replants them).

(R. Yosi): He did so to profit Revai (they were already past the years of Orlah; he did so to exempt them from Revai - we hold that it applies in Chutz la'Aretz only to vines).