Question: [Our Mishnah discusses one who bought it from the husband and from the wife] in two documents. If there was one document [what is the law]?

Answer #1 (R. Ze'ira and R. Ila): All the more so it is Batel. This is when he bought it from the husband, and then from the wife.

Answer #2 (R. Chananyah and R. Bivun): All the more so it is valid. This is when he bought it from the wife, and then from the husband. (We explained this like PNEI MOSHE.)

KORBAN HA'EDAH says that all the more so it is valid, for it is clear that he bought first from the wife. I do not understand this. Surely our Mishnah discusses two documents when it is known through the dates or witnesses which was first! Also, perhaps first the buyer bought from her husband alone, and now he wants a document from both of them! Also, if she was with her husband when they sold, there is more reason to say that she merely wanted to please him than when she sold alone!

Question: (When he bought first from the husband, why is the sale Batel?) Is not everything the wife owns Meshubad to the husband to eat the Peros?! (All the more so, he owns Peros of land Meshubad for her Kesuvah. The sale should be valid for Peros!)

Answer (R. Chizkiyah citing R. Acha): Correct! (The sale should be valid for Peros. After her husband dies, she takes from the buyer.)

If he sold to the first buyer and she signed, and he sold [other land] to a second and third buyer and she signed [all the sales are Batel]. She collects her Kesuvah from the last. (The others can say, we left for her land to collect from.) If it is not enough, she collects from the one before him (the second). If it is not enough, she collects from the one before the one before him (the first).

About this, Rav said 'this refers to property that she collects for her Kesuvah (100 or 200; she is like a creditor), but property that she brought to him as Nichsei Tzon Barzel (the value was written in her Kesuvah), she collects from whichever she wants.' (If he sold Nichsei Melug, she takes back all of them. - ME'OR HA'SIMCHAH, SEFER NIR)

(Our Mishnah said that this is when the owner cannot buy back his land, but if he could buy, he comes before anyone else.) If the owner says 'I could have bought', and the one who bought [from the Sikrikon] says 'no', R. Yosi says, the field is in the Chazakah of the owner; ha'Motzi me'Chavero Alav ha'Re'ayah (the buyer must bring a proof in order to take it).

(Rav): I was in the vote [in Rebbi's Beis Din about this]. There is no difference if he pays a quarter [of the money he paid] in land, or in coins. (If he paid four, it was really worth five, so he returns the savings to the owner.)

(R. Yosi bei R. Bun): Land for a Dinar is sold for a quarter less; the coins are a third less than the value (so he returns a quarter of the land, or a third of the price. We explained this like PNEI MOSHE.)