(R. Yosah citing R. Yochanan): (The Seifa teaches that if one says 'b'Fanai Nechtav', and two say 'b'Faneinu Nechtam', it is Kosher.) This is when he (who says b'Fanai Nechtav) holds it.

R. Ze'ira stared at him [in astonishment].

(R. Yosah): Why do you stare at me? [I retract. It is Kosher] even if another holds it.

R. Yosi, before he retracted, held like R. Imi. (Only the Shali'ach is believed like two).

Rebuttal (R. Mana): [Even after he retracted, [we can say that] he holds like [R. Imi]. Two [who saw the] writing is unlike two [who saw the] signatures. Two [who saw the] signatures have great strength (the primary concern is Kiyum. We are not so adamant about testimony of the writing.) Two [who saw the] writing do not have great strength (we need solid testimony about the signatures. We explained this like RIDVAZ.)

(Mishnah): If a Get was written during the day and signed the (same) day, or it was written at night and signed during the day; or it was written at night and signed at night, it is valid.

If it was written during the day and signed at night, it is Pasul;

R. Shimon is Machshir. He disqualifies any document written during the day and signed at night, except for a Get of divorce.

(Gemara - R. Yochanan): It is Pasul due to eating the Peros (the date on the Get implies that he lost the rights to Peros of her property during the day, and really, they were his until it was given the next day.)

Question (Reish Lakish): If so, we should be concerned for Gitin that come from Chutz la'Aretz. Perhaps [this is like concern lest] they were written during the day and signed at night?! (There, it is predated one day, and we disqualify lest she take what he sold that day. Here, surely the date is long before she received it!)

Answer (R. Yochanan): Here (Gitin from overseas), the Ziyuf (ruse) is from another matter. (There is no way to avoid this. The husband realizes, and he can request that Beis Din record when she was divorced. When it was signed the next night, he does not think that he can lose through this. Surely we should enact to protect him! We explained this like MEICHAL HA'MAYIM.)