Explanation: Our Mishnah discusses dry, and even so we forbid with a Kli, for it is a great Shevus.

Explanation: it is unreasonable to be stringent on him, since [the wart] crumbles.

Question: Above (97a), regarding one who found bundles of pairs of Tefilin tied together or bundles of individual Tefilin, he brings them less than four Amos at a time. This shows that [Chachamim] permitted Shevus of the Mikdash outside the Mikdash!

Answer: Shevus in such a case, that [Tefilin] are in disgrace, surely they permitted.

Question: Is this fine for R. Eliezer?! He permits here only through his teeth, and in our Mishnah he permits by hand, since inside the other taught "if with a Kli, here [in the Mikdash] and here [outside] is forbidden. This connotes that it is permitted by hand!

Answer: On an animal, it is repulsive to cut with his teeth, so [Chachamim] did not obligate cutting with the teeth, rather, [they permit] by hand.

Question: How can we say that according to R. Eliezer, when it is possible to deviate [from the normal way], we must deviate?

He said in Shabbos (130a) that one may bring a knife to circumcise even through Reshus ha'Rabim, even though one could deviate and bring it through roofs, Karfifos and Chatzeros!

Answer: There he shortens his path going through Reshus ha'Rabim. Here he can cut it by hand just like with a Kli, so R. Eliezer agrees that we deviate.

Question: It should teach a bigger Chidush, e.g. it came on a place where he can remove it himself, and even so, he is permitted to remove it himself, even though it is not k'Le'acher Yad (unskillfully)!

Answer: Had it not taught about his friend, one might have thought that we do not permit another to remove it, in order that this one will serve.

Explanation: [If it is Rabanan] we would learn from this two matters. One is that Machshirei (preparations) for a Mitzvah do not override an Av Melachah;

Also, we would learn that with a Kli, that agree that he is Chayav Chatas.

However, now [that it is R. Eliezer] we cannot resolve and deduce that with a Kli it is forbidden due to an Av Melachah, for also by hand, it is Shevus, and he does not permit.

Explanation: Just like we change from an Av Melachah to Shevus, likewise we change from a severe Shevus to a lenient Shevus;

However, if you will say that it is Rabanan, why do they pursue a Shevus Kolsheu (very small)?

Question (ha'Sar mi'Kutzi): Why is he pleased to make a distancing according to R. Eliezer, more than according to Rabanan? It seems oppositely, for R. Eliezer is more lenient!

Answer (ha'Sar mi'Kutzi): Hi ha'Nosenes (this very reason is a reason to say oppositely)! According to Rabanan, we should permit any Shevus, for no ruin will result, since they hold that we do not override Shabbos for Hechsher;

However, according to R. Eliezer, who holds that Machshirim override, however, when it is possible to deviate, we deviate - we should seek a lenient Shevus, lest people come to permit without a Shinuy when it is possible to deviate.