Citation: In our Mishnah above (101a) of a door to Muktzah and bundles of thorns used to seal a breach in a wall, we require that they are high above the ground;

It seems that even though it can stand through that rope, even so it is not taken through the rope, for if they wanted to move it from place to place through that rope, it would break. Therefore we require that they are high above the ground.

It is also like R. Yehudah, for we rule like R. Yehudah. If it could be taken through the rope, even if it drags and has no ball, and even if it is tied to the bolt, R. Yehudah permits, like is proven here.

Explanation (Rashi): We may lock with it outside the Mikdash, but regarding [R. Yehudah's Heter for a resting bolt in the Mikdash, the Halachah does not follow him.

Explanation: Until now, we discussed when the porch is high, and the hole does not go through to the ground;

Now we ask if the hole goes until [the ground, so the bolt] enters and in inserted in the ground. This resembles building more.

Question: We say in Shabbos (35a) about a hive, that Abaye asked Rabah if it holds two Kor (60 Sa'im), and he did not permit!

Answer: A hive is different. It is not normal to move it during the week at all. However, this beam was constantly moved during the week to lock the door. Therefore, it is permitted.

Explanation (Rashi): There are small canopies next to each other. Each does not have a Tefach.

Question: We should say Lavud from one canopy to another (if less than three Tefachim separate them, it is as if they are connected)!

Answer: Above, it is considered an Ohel through Lavud, i.e. so he may increase [the Ohel] the next day on Shabbos;

However, it is unreasonable that in such a case it is considered making an Ohel to forbid doing so on Shabbos;

Will we say that one may not extend two strings within three [Tefachim] of each other due to making an Ohel?!

Explanation #1 (Rashi): The reason is not due to Ohel.

Consequence: According to this, felt hats are permitted, even though it makes an Ohel of a Tefach, as long as it is tied under his throat, so it will not fall and he will come to carry it four Amos in Reshus ha'Rabim.

Explanation #2 (R. Chananel): When it is tight it is forbidden, for the Tefach that juts out from the hat does not bend, and it looks like an Ohel.

Consequence: According to this, hats are forbidden.

Explanation #1 (Rashi): He holds that Binyan and Stirah apply to Kelim. This was said in the Gemara regarding a chest, box or tower.

Question #1: Is our Mishnah like Beis Shamai? Beis Hillel hold that Binyan and Stirah do not apply to Kelim, in Beitzah (22a)!

Question #2: In the Gemara, regarding "the top one here and here is forbidden, lest he be Toke'a (insert forcefully)", [Rashi] gave a difficult explanation that "lest he be Toke'a" refers to the lower [hinge], for if it referred to the upper hinge-pin, it would not be forbidden in the Mikdash, for there is no Shevus in the Mikdash. This is very difficult.

Explanation #2 (Ri): Even though [returning] the top hinge-pin is mid'Rabanan (for Binyan and Stirah do not apply to Kelim), a great Shevus like this (it is very close to a Torah Isur) was not permitted in the Mikdash;

We find many [Shevusim] that were not permitted in the Mikdash, e.g. arranging sticks [between loaves of Lechem ha'Panim] and removing them. It does not override Shabbos.

Explanation #1 (Rashi): This is a decree lest he smear. However, there is no concern for grinding ingredients [to make a remedy], since [the bandage] was on him from before Shabbos.

Question: In Shabbos (64b), it says that a woman may go out with a pepper or grain of salt, and if it fell, she may not return it. What is the reason? Since it was already on her [there is no concern for grinding]!

Answer: There, the reason is because she looks like one who intends to take it outside, and people will come to permit Hotza'ah.

Explanation #2: Rabbeinu Yosef explained there that the reason is due to grinding ingredients. We can say the same in our Sugya;

It mentioned a bandage for a Chidush. Even though there is concern for grinding ingredients and smearing, we permit in the Mikdash.

Question: What is this unlike a pepper or grain of salt? If it fell, she may not return it!

Answer #1: The case of the pepper [or grain of salt] is when it fell on the ground, and here [the bandage] fell on a Kli, like Rav Chisda says below;

Rav Ashi, who said below "I did not hear (i.e. I disagree)", does not refer to Rav Chisda, like Rashi explained. Rather, he refers to "the Halachah follows R. Yehudah";

However, [Rav Ashi] does not argue with Rav Chisda's teaching. He agrees that Rabanan permit only [when it fell] on a Kli.

Answer #2: The case of a [pepper or] grain of salt is like R. Yehudah, who forbids here.

Alternative text: R. Chananel's text says "in front of [my] father".

Support: It seems that the text does not say "in front of Rava", for the day that Rava died, Rav Ashi was born.

Explanation #1 (Rashi): [The string] was not there (tied to the lyre) before Shabbos.

Explanation #2 (Ri): L'Chatchilah is even if it snapped today, and he wants to bring it down and [fix] it without a knot, this is l'Chatchilah.