WHICH SPECIES ARE OBLIGATED IN CHALAH? (Yerushalmi Chalah Perek 1 Halachah 3 Daf 7b)
(îéìéäåï ãøáðéï ôìéâéï - äâø"à îåç÷å) ëäðà ùàì ìùîåàì ìà îñúáøà áääï îãåîò. ãúðéðï äëà ùøåáä úøåîä (úøåîä - ø"ù ñéøéìéå îåç÷å)
Question (Kahana, to Shmuel): Is it not reasonable that the Meduma taught in our Mishnah [that is exempt from Chalah] is when the majority is Terumah?
[ãó éá òîåã á (òåæ åäãø)] à"ì àåó àðà ñáø ëï. àìà ëã úéñå÷ ìàøòà ãéùøàì àú ùàì ìä.
Answer (Shmuel): Also I hold like this. However, when you ascend to Eretz Yisrael, ask this!
ëã ñì÷ ìäëà ùîò øáé éñà áùí øáé éåçðï àôéìå ñàä àçú ùðôìä (òì) [ö"ì ìúåê - àåø æøåò øéæ] úùòéí åúùò çåìéï.
When [Kahana] ascended to Eretz Yisrael, he heard R. Yosa say in the name of R. Yochanan 'even one Se'ah [of Terumah] that fell into 99 of Chulin.' (Even though mid'Oraisa, the Terumah is Batel, mid'Rabanan it is Meduma. It can exempt from Chalah nowadays, after the Churban, which is mid'Rabanan.)
à"ø àáäå ëã îùéá øáé ùîòåï áï ì÷éù ìøáé éåçðï äñàä ôåèøú àú äëì.
Question (R. Avahu): Reish Lakish asked R. Yochanan, does one Se'ah exempt everything?! (Reish Lakish holds like Shmuel, that only a majority of Terumah exempts.)
àîø ìéä åëé òéâåì áòéâåìéï ãáø áøé ùäúøåîä òåìä áéãå åàú àîøú ãáø ÷ì äåà
Answer (R. Yochanan): When a ring [of Terumah figs fell] into rings [of Chulin figs, we remove one and give it to a Kohen, and the rest are permitted to Zarim]. Is it clear that the Terumah came to his hand (that we permit the rest), and you said that this is a leniency (because nowadays, Terumah is mid'Rabanan);
àó äëà ÷ì äåà
Also here, this is a leniency [of Chalah nowadays, which is mid'Rabanan! We explained this like MAHARA FULDA.]
(åéúáéðéä ùðééà äà áòéâåìéï ùëáø áèìå - äâø"à îåç÷å) øáé éåðä åøáé éåñé úøéäåï áùí øáé æòéøà àôéìå çéèéï áçéèéï èåçï åîúéø:
(R. Yonah and R. Yosi, both citing R. Ze'ira): Even if [Terumah] wheat [became mixed with Chulin] wheat, he grinds [it all] and permits. (This shows that the Heter is due to Bitul, and not because we assume that the Terumah came to his hand - RIDVAZ.)
åôçåú îçîùú øáòéí áúáåàä.
(Mishnah): And less than five Reva'im of grain [are exempt from Chalah].
à"ø (àáéðà) [àáåðà] äãà àîøä ëùäéå ôçåú îçîùú øáòéí. àáì àí äéå çîùú øáòéí îöåîöîéï ìà áãà.
Inference (R. Avuna): This teaches that less than five Reva'im [are exempt], but if they were exactly five Reva'im, no (they are not exempt).
[ãó éâ òîåã à (òåæ åäãø)] ø' éåñé áé ø' áåï áùí ø' àáåðà ìà òì äãà àúàîøú. àìà òì äãà ãàîø ø' éåçðï îãåîò ôèåø îï äçìä. ñô÷ îãåîò (åäðàëì) [ö"ì äðàëì - îäø"à ôåìãà, äâø"à] îùåí ãéîåò çééá áçìä
(R. Yosi bei R. Bun citing R. Avuna): This was not said about this, rather, about R. Yochanan's teaching 'Meduma is exempt from Chalah. Safek Meduma, which is eaten in spite of Dimu'a (even Zarim are permitted), is obligated in Chalah;
òìéä ø' éåñé áé øáé áåï áùí øáé àáåðà äãà ãàéúîø ëùäéå éåúø îçîùú øáòéí àáì àí äéå çîùú øáòéí îöåîöîéï ôèåøä îï äçìä:
About this, R. Yosi bei R. Bun citing R. Avuna said 'this was said when there are more than five Reva'im (and there are five Reva'im without the Terumah), but if they were exactly five Reva'im, it is exempt from Chalah. (We explained this like MAHARA FULDA, GRA.)