What are the implications of "Va'achaltem oso be'Chol Makom"?
Rashi #1: It implies that Ma'aser may be eaten anywhere, even in a cemetery.
Rashi #2 (in Re'ei Devarim, 14:23): It implies that Ma'aser Rishon must be given to a Levi, but not to a Kohen, 1 since a Kohen is forbidden to enter a cemetery. 2
Targum Yonasan: With reference to T'rumas Ma'aser, it is permitting the Kohen to eat it anywhere (and not specificlly in Yerushalayim).
What is the latter half of the Pasuk ? ?ki Sachar hu Lachem Cheilef Avodaschem ? ? - coming to teach us?
Rashi: Refer to 3:8:1:1*.
Moshav Zekenim (citing R. Eliezer of Garmaiza): If the Levi'im were to receive a portion, they would work the land. The Pasuk teaches us that, now that they work for Hashem, Ma'aser is their portion from [what is received from] working the land.
Sifri: It teaches us that a Levi is only elgible to receive Ma'aser Rishon if he performs all the Avodos of a Levi - but not if he declines to undertake to fulfil even one of them.
Why does the Torah insert the (otherwise superfluous) words "Atem u'Veischem"?