(Yitzchak bar Isteiyah): Reish Lakish wanted to teach 16 women - also a Chalutzah exempts her Tzarah. (Reish Lakish holds that after Chalitzah, a Lav forbids her to the one who was Choletz her, and Kares forbids her to the other brothers. If she married the Choletz, Kidushin takes effect; if he died, Kares forbids her to the brothers, so she exempts her Tzarah.)

Question (R. Yakov of the south): Why didn't [our Mishnah] teach it [according to Reish Lakish]?

Answer: It is due to R. Akiva, who says that a Mamzer results from a Chalutzah (he holds that there is no Kidushin with Chayavei Lavim).

Question: It should teach it, according to Rabanan (the Halachah follows them)!

Answer: It came to teach only matters that all agree about them.

Yitzchak bar Isteiyah (who said that Reish Lakish wanted to teach also a Chalutzah) holds like R. Ami [and unlike R. Yosah];

(R. Yosa): R. Yochanan and Reish Lakish argued - R. Yochanan said that [the Choletz] is not Chayav [Kares] for the Chalutzah, and the brothers are Chayav [Kares] for her. Both he and the brothers are Chayav [Kares] for the Tzarah;

Reish Lakish said, both he and the brothers are not Chayav [Kares] for the Chalutzah, and not for the Tzarah.

R. Ami switches the opinions [of R. Yochanan and Reish Lakish].

Question (R. Ze'irah, to R. Yosa): R. Ami switches the opinions! (Perhaps his version is correct, and yours is not!)

Answer (R. Yosa): There are different opinions [among Amora'im] about R. Yochanan's opinion (he retracted).

Question: Even if you will say that there are different opinions about R. Yochanan's opinion, will you say that there are different opinions about Reish Lakish's opinion [and he retracted to hold like R. Yochanan initially said]?!

Yitzchak bar Isteiyah's teaching supports R. Ami. The words of [the following] Rabanan support R. Yosa [about the Chalutzah - HA'GAON RAV C. KANIEVSKY, SHLITA];

(R. Yirmeyah and R. Ba, citing R. Chiya bar Ba): All agree about the Tzarah that [the Choletz] is Chayav [Kares] for her;

What do they argue about? They argue about the Chalutzah. R. Yochanan says that [the Choletz] is not Chayav for her, but the brothers are Chayav for her.

[The following] Rabanan's words teach that Chalitzah is an exemption [from Zikah, i.e. her attachment to the Yavam. It is not a Kinyan, as if he married her and divorced her];

Question (Shimon bar Ba, to R. Yochanan): What is the difference between one who is Choletz, and one who divorces?

Answer (R. Yochanan): You think that Chalitzah is a Kinyan? It is only an exemption. The brothers are not liable for her because she is like the [divorced] wife of the Choletz. Rather, they are liable for her because she was the wife of the Mes.