which PROPERTY OF TZADIKIM IS DESTROYED?
Why do we need a Drashah to teach about Tzadikim's property inside the city?
Iyun Yakov: Since they did not sin, it should be considered Shelal Shamayim, which is not burned.
"Shelalah" should exclude Resha'im's property outside the city!
Rashi (according to Rashash), Iyun Yakov: "Kol Shelalah" includes it.
What is the law of animals and slaves of Tzadikim in the city?
Daf Al ha'Daf citing Over Orach (128): Rav Avraham ha'Kohen was unsure; perhaps a Rasha's animal is killed due to its owner's evil. I see no reason for doubt. The Torah included Nichsei Tzadikim like Nichsei Resha'im! Surely we do not kill an Eved Kena'ani, for one is Chayav Misah for killing him. However, I am unsure about a Nochri slave who is not an Eved Kena'ani, even of a Rasha. I later saw that Minchas Chinuch (464:20) discusses slaves. (He says that we kill the Eved Kena'ani of a Rasha, just like we kill his wife and animals, but not of a Tzadik.)
May Tzadikim of the city leave dressed, or are their clothes burned?
Daf Al ha'Daf citing Pardes Yosef ha'Chadash (Re'eh): Rashi (Erchin 7b) learns from here that they leave naked; their clothes are burned. Our Gemara did not discuss this. This implies that they leave clothed! Beis Yitzchak (OC 14:7) says so. The Rambam did not discuss this; the Lechem Mishneh and Minchas Chinuch say that he holds like Rashi; the Chazon Ish (Sanhedrin 24:15) disagrees, Beis Yitzchak (ibid. 10) brought from his son that Kevod ha'Beriyos overrides even a Lav in the Torah, so they leave clothed.
Why did R. Shimon give the reason why Tzadikim's property inside the city is destroyed?
Rashi: R. Shimon always explains the reasons for Mitzvos.
Margoliyos ha'Yam 17: The Zohar says that wherever Resha'im live is destroyed. One should always live where people of good deeds live.
Iyun Yakov: Since "Shelalah" excludes [Shelal Shamayim], one might have thought that also Tzadikim's property is excluded.