1) TOSFOS DH Harei Hi Lecha k'Minchas Temidim
úåñôåú ã"ä äøé äéà ìê ëîðçú úîéãéï
(SUMMARY: Tosfos gives the source that Temidim are Docheh Shabbos and Tum'ah.)
ãëúéá âáé ùáú (áîãáø ëâ) òì òåìú äúîéã )åôñç ðîé âîøéðï îåòãå îåòãå îúîéã) [ö"ì åúîéã ðîé âîøéðï îåòãå îåòãå îôñç - ç÷ ðúï]
(a) Explanation: It is written about Shabbos "Al Olas ha'Tamid" (we offer it even on Shabbos), and also Tamid we learn [that it overrides Tum'ah] from a Gezeirah Shavah "Mo'ado-Mo'ado" from Pesach.
úéîä ãìîã îï äìîã äåé
(b) Question: This is Lamed from Lamed [from which we do not learn in Kodshim]!
åðøàä ãâìåéé îéìúà áòìîà äåà:
(c) Answer: This is a mere Giluy Milsa.
2) TOSFOS DH Afi Lah me'Esmol Ifselah b'Linah
úåñôåú ã"ä àôé ìä îàúîåì àéôñìä áìéðä
(SUMMARY: Tosfos discusses whether Linah applies to Kodshim baked before Shabbos.)
úéîä ãáñåó øáé éùîòàì (ì÷îï ãó òá:) îøáéðï ùúé äìçí îãëúéá îåòãé ä' äëúåá ÷áò îåòã àçã ìëåìï
(a) Question: Below (72b) we include Shtei ha'Lechem, since it is written "Mo'adei Hash-m" - the verse fixed one Mo'ed for all of them. (The Omer, Shtei ha'Lechem and the Korbanos that accompany these, each has one fixed time, even if they fall on Shabbos and can be done only b'Tum'ah.)
åîñé÷ ùúé äìçí ìàôééä å÷ñáø úðåø î÷ãù åàé àôé ìä îàúîåì àéôñìä áìéðä åàô''ä áòé ÷øà
1. We conclude that Shtei ha'Lechem is [Docheh Shabbos] for baking. If it would be baked the previous day, it would be disqualified due to Linah. Even so, we need a verse [to permit on Shabbos]!
åé''ì ãä''à ãàôé ìä áúðåø çåì àáì äëà ëúéá îçáú òì ëøçå öøéê ìòùåú áîçáú ëìé ùøú
(b) Answer: One might have thought that he bakes them in a Chulin oven. However, here (Chavitim) it is written Machavas. You are forced to say that he must make them in a Machavas that is a Kli Shares.
åúéîä ãä''ð ìà áòé àìà àôééä àáì ä÷èøä ôùéèà ìéä ããçé
(c) Question: Also here, [the questioner] asks only about baking [Chavitim], but Haktarah, it is obvious to him that it is Docheh;
åáëì ÷øáðåú áòéðï ÷øà ëãôé' ìòéì ìùçéèúï åìä÷èøä
1. In all Korbanos we require a verse, like I explained above, for Shechitah and Haktarah! (It is not clear whether Tosfos refers to the Sugya he cited above (72b), or above DH Harei, or on 50b DH Ta'aseh.)
åáîä äöã ìà éìôéðï àôéìå îòåîø åùúé äìçí ùëï áàéí òîäí îéðé ãîéí
2. And we do not learn [Chavitim] from a Tzad ha'Shavah, even from the Omer and Shtei ha'Lechem, because kinds of [Kodshim with] blood are brought with them!
åé''ì (ãëé ÷èøä ôùéèà ìäå ãáòéðï) [ö"ì ãáä÷èøä ôùéèà ìäå - öàï ÷ãùéí] àå îúòùä àôé' áùáú ëúðà ãáé øáé éùîòàì àå îäøé äéà ìê ëîðçú úîéãéï ããøéù àáéé ãùéìäé äàé ôéø÷à (ãó ðá.) ãøéù ìéä øáà âåôéä
(d) Answer: It is obvious to them (Rav Huna and Rava, who bring sources only for baking) that Haktarah overrides, either from "Te'aseh" even on Shabbos, like Tana d'Vei R. Yishmael, or from [Chavitim] are like Minchas Tamid, which Abaye expounds. Below (52a) Rava himself expounds it.
åúéîä äéëé îåëç ãàé àôé ìä îàúîåì àéôñìä áìéðä äà ëìé ùøú àéï î÷ãùéï àìà áæîðï
(e) Question: How is it proven that if he baked them from yesterday, they are disqualified through Linah? Klei Shares are Mekadesh only in their time!
åé''ì ëãôé' ìòéì ëéåï ãëúéá á÷øà òì îçáú òì ëøçéï áòé ÷éãåù ëìé
(f) Answer: This is like I explained above. Since the verse says Al Machavas, you are forced to say that it needs Kidush Kli.
îéäå ÷ùéà ì÷îï (ãó öä:) âáé ùúé äìçí ãäà ìà ëúéá úðåø á÷øà åäéëé îåëç ãàôééúï ãåçä ùáú
(g) Question: It is difficult, for below (95b), regarding Shtei ha'Lechem, "oven" is not written. How is it proven that baking them is Docheh Shabbos?
åéù ìåîø ëéåï ãìà ãçå ùáú àí ëï îàúîåì ðîé äåé æîðï
(h) Answer: (Rebbi holds that even so, l'Chatchilah they must be baked in a Kodesh oven.) [If the Halachah were] that they are not Docheh Shabbos, also yesterday would be their time [so the oven would be Mekadesh them, and Linah would disqualify them].
åà''ú áñåó ìåìá åòøáä (ñåëä ãó îè:) âáé ëîòùäå áçåì ëê îòùäå áùáú åôøéê áâîøà åðééúé áî÷åãùú àîø æòéøé àéï ùéòåø ìîéí åàé ùãé ìä áî÷åãùú àéôñìä ìä áìéðä
(i) Question: In Sukah (49b), regarding "like [Nisuch ha'Mayim] is done on a weekday, it is done on Shabbos", the Gemara asks "they should bring it in a Kodesh Kli!", and Ze'iri answered that there is no Shi'ur to the water. If he puts it in a Kodesh Kli, it will be disqualified through Linah;
åàîàé àéôñì ëéåï ãàéï æîðä îàúîåì
1. Why will it be disqualified, since yesterday is not its time? (Olas Shlomo - the above answer does not apply, for one can take water from the Kiyor on Shabbos.)
åé''ì ãäúí ùàéáú îéí áìéìä ìàå îçåñø æîï äåà
(j) Answer: There, drawing water at night is not Mechusar Zman.
åëé äàé âååðà áñåó ùúé äìçí (ì÷îï ãó öä:) ãáçåì àùëçéðäå ã÷àôå àîø ìäå ãøê çåì ÷àôéúå àó ëé äéåí é÷ãù áìéðä àéôñéì ìéä
(k) Support - Implied question: Below (95), it says that [David] found [Kohanim in Nochri] baking [Lechem ha'Panim] on a weekday (Erev Shabbos). He said "do you bake in the way of Chol? Today it will become Kadosh, and it will be disqualified through Linah! (Why will it be disqualified? Its time is on Shabbos!)
ìôé ãáøéäí äéä àåîø ùäéå ñáåøéí ãæîðå áçåì åâí àåôéï àåúå áëìé ùøú
1. Answer #1: He said to them according to what they thought, that its time (to bake it) is on a Yom Chol, and also we bake it in a Kli Shares.
à''ð ìàçø àôééä ðåúðéï àåúå á÷òøåú æäá ëôéøåù ä÷åðèøñ åäéä ùí áìéìä åîéôñìà áìéðä ãìéìä àéï îçåñø æîï
2. Answer #2: After baking it they put it in gold bowls, like Rashi explained, and it is there at night, and it is disqualified through Linah, for night is not Mechusar Zman.
åìî''ã (ì÷îï ãó öä:) úðåø àéðå î÷ãù ðøàä ìé ùâí ä÷òøåú ìà äú÷ãùå
3. Assertion: According to the opinion (95b) that the oven is not Mekadesh (he says that David found them baking it on Shabbos, and told them that they should bake on a Yom Chol, for the oven is not Mekadesh, so Linah will not disqualify), it seems that also the bowls were not Mekudash.
3) TOSFOS DH Tanya Kevasei d'Rava
úåñôåú ã"ä úðéà ëååúéä ãøáà
(SUMMARY: Tosfos points out that there is also a Beraisa like Abaye.)
àò''â ãëàáéé ðîé úðéà
(a) Implied question: There is also a Beraisa like Abaye!
äà àîøï ãøáà ðîé ìà ôìéâ òìéä àìà ãìà öøéê
(b) Answer: We said that Rava does not disagree with [the Drashah of] Abaye, just [Rava holds that Abaye's Drashah] is not needed.
4) TOSFOS DH Talmud Lomar Soles l'Minchah Tamid
úåñôåú ã"ä úìîåã ìåîø ñåìú ìîðçä úîéã
(SUMMARY: Tosfos explains why he needs ba'Shemen.)
úéîä ãà''ë áùîï ìîä ìé
(a) Question: If so, why does it say "ba'Shemen"? (We learn from here that it has oil like Minchas Tamid!)
åéù ìåîø ãàé ìà áùîï ìà äåä îñúáø ìà÷åùé ìâáé ùîï:
(b) Answer: If not for "ba'Shemen", it would be unreasonable to equate them regarding oil.
51b----------------------------------------51b
5) TOSFOS DH veha'Kohen ha'Mashi'ach Tachtav mi'Banav Ya'aseh Osah
úåñôåú ã"ä åäëäï äîùéç úçúéå îáðéå éòùä àåúä
(SUMMARY: Tosfos resolves this with a Drashah in Kerisus.)
[ö"ì úéîä - öàï ÷ãùéí] îäëà ãøùéðï ô''÷ ãëøéúåú (ãó ä:) ãë''â áï ë''â èòåï îùéçä
(a) Question: From here we expound in Kerisus (5b) that a Kohen Gadol the son of a Kohen Gadol must be anointed!
åäééðå äà ðîé ãîöøéê (áúîåøä (ãó éà) ääåà ÷øà) [ö"ì äàé ÷øà ì÷îï - öàï ÷ãùéí] ìëäðéí âãåìéí
(b) Answer: This is [from] the Drashah below, that we require this verse for Kohanim Gedolim. (Even though it teaches about who offers the Chavitim after the Kohen Gadol dies, we infer that if his son is Kohen Gadol, he is anointed.)
6) TOSFOS DH she'Tehei Kulah b'Haktarah
úåñôåú ã"ä ùúäà ëåìä áä÷èøä
(SUMMARY: Tosfos brings two explanations of this from Rashi.)
ôé' á÷åðèøñ ùìà éòùä ìä ùéøééí
(a) Explanation #1 (Rashi): He does not make Shirayim from it.
åäà ãáòé ì÷îï åøáé éäåãä äàé ëìéì ú÷èø îàé òáéã ìéä
1. Implied question: Below, we ask how does R. Yehudah expound "Kalil Taktar"? (We should say that it teaches that he does not make Shirayim from it!)
ëéåï ãääåà îðçú ëäðéí ôùéèà ãëåìä ëìéì åìà àéöèøéê àìà ìø''ù ã÷ñáø îùì òåìí úäà
2. Answer: Since [R. Yehudah holds that his heirs bring it,] it is Minchas Kohen. Obviously, it is totally Kalil! The verse is needed only according to R. Shimon, who says that it is from the Tzibur.
òåã ôé' ì''à ùàéðä ÷øéáä ìçöàéï
(b) Explanation #2 (Rashi): This teaches that it is offered [fully, and] not half.
7) TOSFOS DH Vov Lo Darish
úåñôåú ã"ä åé''å ìà ãøéù
(SUMMARY: Tosfos points out that sometimes he expounds it.)
äëà ìà ãøéù ø''ù åé''å åëï ô''÷ ãñðäãøéï (ãó éã.) âáé æ÷ðéê åùåôèéê åáô''÷ ãñåèä (ãó å:)
(a) Observation: Here R. Shimon does not expound Vov, and also in Sanhedrin (14a) regarding "Zekenecha v'Shoftecha", and in Sotah (6b).
àáì åé''å îåñéó òì òðééï øàùåï [áôø÷ ä÷åîõ øáä[ ãøéù åëï åé''å äãø òøáéä ãøéù îøåáä (á''÷ ãó ñä:) åôø÷ á' ãò''æ (ãó ëã.)
(b) Distinction: However, he expounds Vov Mosif Al Inyan Rishon above (19a), and also "the Vov connects" in Bava Kama (65b) and in Avodah Zarah (24a).
å÷ùä ãáôø÷ ëì äàñåøéï (úîåøä ãó ëç:) ãøéù ìéä âáé àí ðàîø ðåâç ìîä ðàîø øåáò åîåé''å äåà ããøùéðï äëé
(c) Question: In Temurah (28b) he expounds it regarding "if Noge'ach (an ox that killed) was taught, why was Rove'a (it was Bo'el a person) taught?", and we expound so from the Vov!
åéù ìåîø ãîùåí ãàéëà îï îåëç ãåîï ìîãøù àúà
(d) Answer: Because there is "Min" ("Min ha'Behemah Min ha'Bakar"), it is proven that "u'Min [ha'Tzon]" comes for a Drashah.
îéäå äê ÷åùéà ãøéù ã' îéúåú (ñðäãøéï ãó ðà:) âáé áú ëäï àçú àøåñä åàçú ðùåàä áùøéôä ãøéù (áú åáú ëø' ò÷éáà åáøééúà ãøéù ôéø÷éï îåëç) [ö"ì ááøééúà áú åáú ëø' ò÷éáà åîåëç äúí ãàúéà - éùø åèåá] ëø''ù
(e) Question #1: In Sanhedrin (51b), regarding a Bas Kohen [who was Mezanah], whether she is Arusah or Nesu'ah, she is burned, a Beraisa expounds [that it is not written] Bas, [rather,] u'Vas", like R. Akiva, and it is proven there that it is like R. Shimon!
åáîòéìä ôø÷ ÷ãùé îæáç (ãó éæ.) ãøéù ø''ù ãí ùøõ ãèîà îãëúéá åæä åîåëç ááøàùéú øáä ãîåé''å ÷ãøéù
(f) Question #2: In Me'ilah (17a), R. Shimon expounds that Dam Sheretz is Tamei, since it is written "v'Zeh", and it is proven in Bereishis Rabah that he expounds from the Vov!
åúå ãøáé éäåãä ãøéù äëà åé''å åáôø÷ àìå îöéàåú (á''î ãó ëæ.) âáé åîöàúä åñåó ô''÷ ãñðäãøéï (ãó éã.) âáé åùåôèéê ãøéù åé''å
(g) Question #3: Here, R. Yehudah expounds Vov, and in Bava Metzi'a (27a) regarding "u'Matzasah", and in Sanhedrin (14a) regarding v'Shoftecha he expounds Vov;
åáøéù úîåøä (ãó á:) âáé åàí äîø éîéø àîøéðï åé''å ìà ãøéù
1. And in Temurah (2b) regarding "v'Im Hamer Yamir", we say that he does not expound Vov!
åô' èøó á÷ìôé (éåîà ãó îä.) (àéáøéí åôãøéí ùðúòëìå) [ö"ì âáé àéáøéí åôãøéí ùìà ðúòëìå - âîøà òåæ åäãø] îáòøá åô''á ãñðäãøéï (ãó ëà.) âáé îìê ãìà ùøå øáé éäåãä åø''ù àìà é''ç ðùéí åîàï ããøéù åé''å ãøéù èôé
2. And in Yoma (45a) regarding limbs and Chelev that were not consumed at night, and in Sanhedrin (21a) regarding a king, that R. Yehudah and R. Shimon permit him only 18 wives, and the one who expounds Vov expounds more! (And they do not expound an extra Ma'arachah for limbs and Chelev, unlike R. Meir, who expounds from Vov.)
åùîà ìäðé ãøùé äåà ãìà ãøùé ìéä åèåáà àùëçï ëé ä''â
(h) Answer: Perhaps for these they do not expound [Vov]. We find many cases like this. (Above (11b DH v'Rebbi), Tosfos said that R. Shimon does not always expound "Es".)
8) TOSFOS DH Chok Zeh l'Olam Tehei
úåñôåú ã"ä ç÷ æå ìòåìí úäà
(SUMMARY: Tosfos explains what R. Yehudah would say without the Drashah.)
ãä''à àäøï î÷øéá çáéúéï áëì éåí åáðéå áùòä ùðòùå ëäðéí âãåìéí àò''ô ùëáø ðúçðëå áëäåðú äãéåè
(a) Explanation: One might have thought that Aharon offers Chavitim every day, and his children [only] when they become a Kohen Gadol, even though they already were inaugurated to be a Kohen Hedyot (and offered Chavitim then);
åøáé ùîòåï ìéú ìéä äàé ñáøà
1. R. Shimon disagrees with this reasoning.
9) TOSFOS DH Af Kan Lo Sa'aseh Al Achilaso
úåñôåú ã"ä àó ëàï ìà úòùä òì àëéìúå
(SUMMARY: Tosfos discusses the source for an Isur and the Lav.)
àáì àéñåøà ðô÷à ìï îëìéì ú÷èø
(a) Explanation: However, we learn an Isur from Kalil Taktar.
å÷öú ÷ùéà àîàé ìà ãøùéðï ìàå ðîé îãëúéá ìàîø ìàå àîåø ëããøùéðï ôø÷ ëì ùòä (ôñçéí ãó îá.)
(b) Question: Why don't we expound a Lav also from "Leimor" - Lav Amur, like we expound in Pesachim (42a)?
10) TOSFOS DH Yesh Lo Nesachim
úåñôåú ã"ä éù ìå ðñëéí
(SUMMARY: Tosfos explains that he separated them in his lifetime.)
ùäôøéùï áçééå ãìàçø îéúä äåé äëì äô÷ø
(a) Explanation: He separated them in his lifetime. [We must say so, for if not,] after death everything (all his property) is Hefker.
11) TOSFOS DH d'Ka Midcheka Lishkah
úåñôåú ã"ä ã÷à îãç÷à ìéùëä
(SUMMARY: Tosfos explains why this was a financial burden.)
ùááéú ùðé ùäéå ëäðéí ùìà äåöéàå ùðúï
(a) Explanation: In Bayis Sheni they were Kohanim [Gedolim] who did not live the entire year [until next Yom Kipur. In fact, most years the Kohen Gadol died - Yoma 9a.]
12) TOSFOS DH Chatas Melamed she'Mo'alin Bah
úåñôåú ã"ä çèàú îìîã ùîåòìéï áä
(SUMMARY: Tosfos explains the Chidush of this.)
úéîä úéôå÷ ìé ã÷ãùé áã÷ äáéú äéà
(a) Question: I should already know [that there is Me'ilah], for it is Kodshei Bedek ha'Bayis!
åéù ìåîø ãàéöèøéê ìîåòì àçø îåòì ãàéðå àìà ááäîä åëìé ùøú áìáã:
(b) Answer: It needs to teach that there is Mo'el after Mo'el (it did not become Chulin after the first transgressed Me'ilah). This applies only to [Kodesh] animals and Klei Shares.