If a Get was written on a material from which one may not gain benefit...

Beraisa (R. Chagin): Such a case once came before Rebbi and he ruled that she was divorced.

R. Elazar: She is not divorced.

R. Zeirah: The Rabbis disagreed over whether the dispute between Rebbi and R. Elazar applies also to a marriage document, that the one who says she is not married would say that she is not divorced and the one who says that she is married would say that she is divorced.

The Chevraya said that we are stringent (that there is no dispute over marriage).

Question (R. Yosi): What is meant by the term 'stringent'? (Do we say that Rebbi and R. Elazar agree that she is married and R. Elazar is stringent to say that she is not divorced; or alternatively they both hold that she is not married and Rebbi is stringent to say that she is divorced...?)

Option #1: She is not married and she is not divorced.

Option #2: She is not divorced and she is married.

Question: What is the Halachah?

Rabbanan of Kisarin citing R. Yaakov bar Acha: There is no disagreement - the opinion that says that she is married refers to when he betrothed her using a document from which it was only Rabbinically prohibited to gain benefit.

And the opinion that says that she is not married refers to when he betrothed her using a document from which there was a Torah prohibition to gain benefit. However, if it had only been Rabbinically prohibited, she would have been married.

Question: If you say this (that if the document was only Rabbinically prohibited, the Torah marriage takes effect), you are disagreeing with Rav...

Rav: R. Meir says that if a man betrothed a woman using leaven after the sixth hour on Erev Pesach, he has done nothing.

Support for Rav (R. Huna): If one would marry a woman on Pesach using Kortavnian wheat (that grows in the desert, which is only Rabbinically considered Chametz since it is inedible) has he done anything at all?! (In both of these cases the prohibition is only Rabbinic.)] (Note: The Korban HaEidah inserts this sentence into the text from the parallel sugya in Yerushalmi Pesachim 4b)

Answer to question in (h): There, he married her with the item itself (using the method of betrothal with money) so it is essential that the item has some monetary value; but here, he is marrying her with the contents written in the document.

Question: If so, he should also be able to marry her using a document from which there is a Torah prohibition to gain benefit! How is it different from a document that is worth less than a Perutah?

Answer: When there is a Torah prohibition to gain benefit, the document cannot even contribute towards having a total value of a Perutah; here, a document that is worth less than a Perutah can contribute towards having a total value of a Perutah.