(Mishnah): A seducer pays three payments, and a rapist pays four. A Mefateh pays embarrassment, blemish and a fine. Ones pays these, and additionally for pain; A Mefateh does not pay for pain.

A rapist pays a fine immediately. A seducer pays when he divorces her;

A rapist must keep her for a wife. A seducer may divorce her.

(Gemara): This is unlike R. Shimon;

R. Shimon exempts Ones from pain. What is this like? It is like one who cuts a wart from his friend, and his friend was going to cut it later. (He did not cause any additional pain. Also here, she was destined to endure the pain of her Besulim breaking when she marries.) What is this like? It is like one who cuts his friend's young trees, and [his friend] was going to cut them later. (He did not cause a loss.)

Chachamim (to R. Shimon): One who was Niv'eles (a man had Bi'ah with her) b'Ones is unlike one who was Niv'eles willingly. One who was Niv'eles in a wasteheap (i.e. a disgraceful place) is unlike one who was Niv'eles through Chupah.

Question: How does R. Shimon expound "Tachas Asher Inah" (which connotes that he pays for pain)?

Answer (in the name of Rav Chisda): The case [of the verse] is, he had Bi'ah with her on thorns (i.e. he threw her onto hard ground. R. Shimon discusses one who raped her on a bed.)

(Mishnah): A Mefateh pays when he divorces her.

(Rav Chisda): This is when he does not want to keep her, but if he wants to keep her, he does not pay anything.

(Beraisa - R. Yishmael): "Kesef Yishkol k'Mohar ha'Besulos" teaches that [if he marries her,] he makes [the money of the fine] Mohar;

Mohar is Kesuvah, like it says "Hirbu Alai Me'od Mohar u'Matan."

Question (R. Elazar): Daughters of an Anusah - do they have Tenai Kesuvah (e.g. are they fed? We ask according to the opinion that an Anusah does not have a Kesuvah.)

It is obvious to me that an Arusah does not have Kesuvas Benin Dichrin (for she does not have a Kesuvah), and that a Mefutah has Kesuvas Benin Nukvin (her daughters are fed after their father dies, for she has a Kesuvah).

Question: If you will say that he was unsure about both (daughters of an Anusah and of a Mefutah), he should ask, do Benos Anusah and Benos Mefutah has Tenai Kesuvah!

Answer: I am unsure according to Rabanan (who say that an Anusah does not have a Kesuvah. Perhaps also there are no Tenai Kesuvah.) It is obvious to me according to R. Yosi bei R. Yehudah, who says that an Ones gives a Kesuvah of 100 (also Mefutah is obvious, for she has a Kesuvah. We explained this like PNEI MOSHE.)

(Mishnah): When is a rapist forced to marry her? This is even if she is lame, blind or leprous;

If he found immorality in her, or if she may not marry a Yisrael, he may not stay married to her. "She will be his wife" - she must be fitting for him.

(Gemara - R. Yirmeyah citing R. Chiyah citing Reish Lakish) Question: The Torah did not need to write "v'Lo Sihyeh l'Ishah" regarding Motzi Shem Ra, for she is already married to him. Why did it write "v'Lo Sihyeh l'Ishah"?

Answer: We learn from it a Gezeirah Shavah. It says "v'Lo Sihyeh l'Ishah" here, and "v'Lo Sihyeh" (regarding Ones). Just like v'Lo Sihyeh there (Motzi Shem Ra) is a woman proper for him (if not, in any case Beis Din forces him to divorce her), also here (Ones), v'Lo Sihyeh is a woman proper for him.

Suggestion: Just like there (Motzi Shem Ra, only for) a woman proper for him, he pays a fine, we should say that also here (Ones, only for) a woman proper for him, he pays a fine!

Answer (R. Ze'ira citing Ula bar Yishmael citing R. Elazar) Question: The Torah did not need to write "v'Lo Sihyeh l'Ishah" regarding Motzi Shem Ra, for she is already married to him. Why did it write v'Lo Sihyeh l'Ishah?

Answer: We learn from it a Gezeirah Shavah "v'Lo Sihyeh, "v'Lo Sihyeh". Just like there (Motzi Shem Ra), if he divorced her, we tell him that he must remarry her, also here (Ones), if he divorced her, we tell him that he must remarry her.

(R. Chiyah - Beraisa): The same applies to Ones and Motzi Shem Ra - if he divorced, we force him to remarry. If he was a Kohen, he receives 40 lashes.

(Beraisa): "Be'ulas Ba'al" includes one who had Bi'ah with her Arus in her father's house. She is an Arusah, but one who had Bi'ah with her is choked. (Normally, one is stoned for an Arusah.)

This is not only if [he had Bi'ah with her] k'Darkah, rather, even Lo k'Darkah.

(R. Avahu citing R. Yochanan): This is needed only for when he had Bi'ah with her Lo k'Darkah.

If you will say that it is k'Darkah, why must it discuss her husband? Even if someone else [had Bi'ah with her, others are not stoned for her]!

(Mishnah): If two had Bi'ah with [a Na'arah Me'urasah], the first is stoned and the second is choked.

(Beraisa): A Na'arah Me'urasah - if 10 had Bi'ah with her Lo k'Darkah, and one k'Darkah, all of them are stoned. If all had Bi'ah with her k'Darkah, the first is stoned, and the rest are choked.

If 10 did Ha'ara'ah (the first stage of Bi'ah) with her, and one did a full Bi'ah, all of them are stoned. If all had full Bi'ah with her, the first is stoned, and the rest are choked.

Regarding a Penuyah, if 10 had Bi'ah with her Lo k'Darkah, and one k'Darkah, all of them pay a fine. If all had Bi'ah with her k'Darkah, the first is stoned, and the rest are exempt.

[If they raped her,] if she chose one of them [to marry him], all [the others] are exempted from the Aseh [to marry her]. If she [retracted and] said 'I do not want him', [all the others are obligated]. She can choose and retract and choose. (Whenever she chooses one, all others are exempt.)

If he was married to her sister, he is already exempted [for she is forbidden to him]. If [her sister] died, he was already exempted. If he died, we do not force the Yavam [to do Chalitzah or Yibum, for his brother was not married to her].