Implied Question: Even though the Gemara earlier, in connection with Arayos, despite the fact that are different bodies, the Gemara required the Pasuk "Ishah" to be Mechayav the sinner on each woman ...

Answer: It nevertheless takes for granted that, according to Rebbi Akiva, when they are different bodies, he is Chayav on each one.

Question: Rabeinu Baruch asks why the Gemara does not cite Kareis that is written by "Achoso" from which the Rabanan Darshen this, and prefers to cite the D'rashah of Rebbi Yitzchak (See Mayim Kedoshim).

Answer: It cites the one that is more straightforward.

Precedent: And we find the same idea in Sanhedrin (Daf 34b) and in Megilah (Daf 20a).

Explanation #1: Rashi explains that he crushes the leek and the water that emerges from the the leek is dripping.

Question #1: In that case, it is 'fruit-juice', and fruit-juice is not Machshir?

Question #2: Moreover, when the Tana says that ha'Sochet be'Sa'aro, Eino be'Chi Yutan, ve'ha'Yotz'i nmimenu, harei Hu be'Chi Yutan', and Rashi explains that he squeezed out his hair after he left the bathhouse' (See Shitah Mekubetzes, 32) ...

Question #2 (cont.): In that case, why is the water from his hair not be'Chi Yutan' - seeing as he initially wants it? ...

Source: And the Mishnah says in Machshirin (1:1) declares liquid that one initially wants a Machshir, even if in the end he does not want it.

Explanation #2: Therefore the Ri explains that it speaks where rain fell on them, and he did not want it until it emerged from them (i.e. from the leek and the hair).

Implied Question: Even though if he does it to keep the Kosel clean, it is not be'Chi Yutan (See Shitah Mekubetzes 34) ...

Answer: That is because he would rather that the rain did not come into the world in the first place ...

Answer (cont.): Whereas here, even though he did not initially want the water, seeing as he himself squeezes it in order to exude the water, he renders it Chachuv.

Explanation #1: Rashi explains because it will ultimately become absorbed in the garment.

Question: In Maseches Nidah in Perek ha'Ishah (Daf 62b & 63a) the Gemara rules that 'Earthenware that absorbed Tamei liquid which falls into an oven, when the oven is heated up, it is Tamei ...

Reason: Because the liquid emerges ...

Question (cont.): Despite the fact that the earthenware will later re-absorb it?

Explanation #2: We therefore need to explain that it is because he does not want it as long as it is on his clothes, like the liquid in the leek.

Implied Question: The Tana could just as well have said that they made 'the one who benefits like the one who eats' - which is not the case by Nosar ...

Answer: Only since he said 'Ma'achil ke'Ochel', he continues 'Mehaneh ke'Neheneh'.