(Mishnah): On the horn of a cow [and he gives to her the cow; the entire cow is her Get].

Our Mishnah discusses when he said to her 'this is your Get', but if he said to her 'this is your Get, and the rest is for your Kesuvah', she received her Get and Kesuvah at once. If he said to her 'this is your Get and Kesuvah at once' [is she not divorced?! - HAGAHOS R. DINAR.]

Question (R. Zeira, to R. Mana): If he handed over to her the reins [of the cow], what is the law?

Monetarily, this makes a Kinyan - do you say the same here (she is divorced)?

Or, perhaps here is different, for it says "v'Nasan b'Yadah" - it must be totally in her hand!

Question: What is the reason for R. Yosi ha'Glili [who says that we may not write on something living, nor on food]?

Answer: [It says] "Sefer" - just like a Sefer is not alive, also anything [Kosher for a Get] is not alive. Just like a Sefer is not food, also anything [Kosher for a Get] is not food.

Question: What is the reason for Rabanan [who allow on something living, and on food? How do they expound "Sefer"?]

Answer: [It says] "Sefer" - just like a Sefer is detached, also anything [Kosher for a Get] is detached.

Question: According to R. Yosi ha'Gelili, are Yados (handles) of food like food?

Answer: We learn from the following. If he wrote on the horn of a deer, cut off [attached flesh], signed [witnesses] on it and gave it to her, it is Kosher;

Inference: This is because he cut it off, and afterwards signed it. Had he signed it and afterwards cut off, no (it would be Pasul. R. Yosi ha'Gelili holds that Edei Chasimah are primary. If it was a Yad for food at the time they signed, it is Pasul. This shows that Yados are like the food. We explained this like NO'AM YERUSHALMI.)

(R. Ba citing R. Meisha): This is only if he wrote on Zacrusah (the interior) of the horn, but if he wrote on the case, it is like something separate, and [all agree that] it is Kosher.

Question (R. Yonah): [According to R. Yosi ha'Gelili, who considers something alive as if it is attached regarding Gitin], will we say that also for Hechsher Zera'im [it is considered attached]? He intended that [one of the seven liquids] fall on an animal, and from the animal [it fell] on food (it is Huchshar only if the animal is considered detached).

There, R. Yosi ha'Gelili said "Sefer" - just like a Sefer [is not attached, and he likewise requires that it] is not alive, also anything [Kosher for a Get] is not alive. Here, does he say so ("b'Chol Kli" (Vayikra 11:34) excludes Mechubar, and likewise it excludes living beings)?

Or, perhaps it is different, for it says "v'Chol Mashkeh Asher Yishaseh b'Chol Kli Yitma" [to include living beings]!

Question: If so, even if he intended [that liquid fall into] a pit, square pit or cave, [it should be Machshir]!

Answer: Here is different, for it is written "Kli" (to exclude something attached, which is not at all like a Kli).