Last Tos on 49a DH" "Tanya Nami" pasted below. I question the summary statment. Tos seems to be asking on the terminology of gemorah, i.e.,why dosen't the gemrah use the term "tanya nami hachi" since Rav Chisda is an amorah.
>>(SUMMARY: Tosfos asks why the Gemara does not also bring a proof from this Beraisa for Rav Yehudah.)
(a)
Question: Why did they not cite 'Tanya Nami Hachi' from this case as proof for Rav Chisda?<<
Avy Dachman, Chicago
Avy,
Tosfos is bothered why the Gemara doesn't say Tanya Nami Hachi, since this Beraisa supports Rav Chisda's statemtent that Rebbi Yehudah agrees with Rebbi Yosi that Seudas Eirusin is a Seudas Mitzvah. It's a proof for Rav Chisda - not Rebbi Yehudah.
We'll correct this, IY"H. Thanks for bringing this to our attention.
Avraham Phillips
Kollel Iyun Hadaf