More Discussions for this daf
1. Tosfos Outlines DH Tanya Amar Rebbi Yehudah 2. Meat for man 3. Chacham eating excessivly
4. Source for Se'udas Erusin 5. Am Haaretz 6. Marrying the daughter of a Talmid Chacham
7. Tosfos Outlines DH Tanya Amar R. Yehudah

Avy Dachman asks:

Last Tos on 49a DH" "Tanya Nami" pasted below. I question the summary statment. Tos seems to be asking on the terminology of gemorah, i.e.,why dosen't the gemrah use the term "tanya nami hachi" since Rav Chisda is an amorah.

>>(SUMMARY: Tosfos asks why the Gemara does not also bring a proof from this Beraisa for Rav Yehudah.)


Question: Why did they not cite 'Tanya Nami Hachi' from this case as proof for Rav Chisda?<<

Avy Dachman, Chicago

The Kollel replies:


Tosfos is bothered why the Gemara does not say "Tanya Nami Hachi," since this Beraisa supports Rav Chisda's statement that Rebbi Yehudah agrees with Rebbi Yosi that Se'udas Eirusin is a Se'udas Mitzvah. It is a proof for Rav Chisda, not Rebbi Yehudah.

We will correct this, iy'H. Thanks for bring this to our attention.

Avraham Phillips