Text: There are some Sefarim that follow this with the text 'Peas are not subject to Risuk Evarim, chickpeas are' ...

Inference: ... implying that they are (both) not considered legumes.

Conclusion: It may well be however, that 'legumes' (in this Sugya) refers (exclusively) to small items, such as lentils, rice, and millet.

Initial Explanation: Initially, Rav worked out well, since his case may well not have been considered Gist'ra.

Conclusion: But now that the Gemara considers the case of Rav Kahana T'reifah because of Gist'ra, his (Rav's) case too, will be Neveilah.

Clarification (Part 1): It is not really the same as Rav, since Rav's case is not Gist'ra. Whereas theirs was Gist'ra and Neveilah.

Clarification (Part 2): Only they ought to have resolved their case from that of Rav, since it is even more (T'reifah) than that of Rav.

Clarification: But had they asked him one She'eilah, even if he had declared Kasher in both cases, he would not have been angry over the fact that they were coming to be Machmir.

Sugya Zevachim: At the end of the second Perek of Zevachim (Daf 30b), the Gemara does not come out as well as it does here, where Levi asked Rebbi what the Din will be where the Kohen thinks to eat a k'Zayis outside the Azarah tomorrow, according to Rebbi Yehudah.

Explanation #1: Rashi explains that this speaks even without the vertebra ...

Explanation #2: ... whereas Rabeinu Tam establishes it with the vertebra.

Proof (Part 1): This is because it is implied earlier that there is no such opinion that declares T'reifah a rib without the vertebra unless it involves the majority of the ribs.

Proof (Part 2): Since the Gemara there queries Rav Kahana and Rav Asi from Ula bar Rebbi Zakai and Rebbi Yochanan (See Tosfos Ha'Rosh).

Clarification: This means that it is specifically a wolf that is Doreis large sheep, but not a cat.

Clarification: Rav Yehudah mentions 'a wolf' and upwards' is in order to teach us that from a wolf and upwards are all equal - just as a lion is Doreis a large animal, so too, is a wolf.

Text: We do have the word 'Netz' in Rav Chisda's statement ...

Reason (Part 1): ... because if we did, then when the Gemara queries him from the Beraisa, it asks from Netz as well; and when the Gemara answers that he holds like B'rivi, we will need to say that he too, refers to a Netz.

Reason (Part 2): ... whereas our Mishnah, which states that a Netz is subject to D'rusah ...

Reason (Part 3): ... is speaking in all cases, even in a case where there is no-one to save the victim.

Query: And if you want to say that B'rivi only differentiates by kid-goats and lambs, but not by birds ...

Refutation: ... then what does the Gemara ask from the case of the chicken in Rav Kahana's house?

Reinstating Query: Even though we are anyway forced to differentiate between kid-goats and lambs, on the one hand, and birds, on the other), to avoid asking from the Beraisa on the Mishnah ...

Answer (Part 1): ... that is because he holds that the poison burns by birds but not by kid-goats and lambs.

Answer (Part 2): .... but B'rivi holds that in a place where there is someone to save it, it burns both by birds and by kid-goats and lambs.

Conclusion of Text #1: ... now if we had the word 'Netz' in Rav Chisda's statement, then we would be forced to say the same by a Netz as well.

Conclusion of Text #2 (Part 1): Furthermore, according to the Ika de'Amri, which establishes the Beraisa like B'rivi, it transpires that, according to Rav Chisda, D'rusas ha'Netz applies in all cases, even to kid-goats and lambs ...

Conclusion of Text #2 (Part 2): ... why does our Mishnah then refer to 'a small bird', and not to kid-goats and lambs?

Question: Why did he not answer that the Beraisa is speaking about large sheep?

Answer: Because the Tana places it together with 'a hawk', which is not subject to D'rusah even by kid-goats and lambs.

Consequently (Part 1): It is therefore clear as to why, in the first Lashon, he does not establish the Beraisa too, like B'rivi, where there is no-one to save it, but where there is, D'rusah will apply to them ...

Consequently (Part 2): ... because the Tana compares it to a hawk, where D'rusah does not apply at all.

Alternative Explanation: According to the 'Ika de'Amri', which however, which establishes the Beraisa like B'rivi, and where the animal has no-one to save it, a cat is not similar to a hawk (since D'rusas ha'Netz applies to birds in all cases, but not at all to kid-goats and lambs) ...