(Mishnah): Clothes of Amei ha'Aretz are Midras (considered like Mishkav of a Zav) for Perushim (pious people). Clothes of Perushim are Midras for Ochlei (people who eat) Terumah. Clothes of Ochlei Terumah are Midras for Kodesh;

Yosi ben Yo'ezer was the Chasid of Kehunah, and his hand-towel was Midras for Kodesh;

Yochanan ben Gudgoda ate Al Taharas ha'Kodesh all his days, and his hand-towel was Midras for Chatas.

(Gemara - R. Yosa citing R. Yochanan): [Our Mishnah] discusses [concern for Midras only also] through Maga (touching).

Question (R. Ze'irah, to R. Yosa): From where did this garment get Tum'as Midras?

Answer (R. Yosa): You can say that the Am ha'Aretz's wife sat on it naked [while she was Nidah].

Question (Shmuel bar Aba, to R. Ze'irah): Just like you say there that there is no [decree about an Am ha'Aretz for] Masa (if a Tahor moves or holds up Tum'ah, he becomes Tamei) for Chulin, but there is Masa for Chulin through (if there was also) Maga, do we say similarly that there is no Heset (for Tum'os like Zav and Nidah, if the Tum'ah moves Taharah, it is Metamei it) for Chulin, but there is Heset for Chulin through Maga? (We explained this like SHA'AREI TORAS ERETZ YISRAEL.)

Question (R. Shmuel, the brother of R. Hoshayah, citing R. Yirmeyah): If [an Am ha'Aretz's wife] sat on a chair and touched it, [what is the law]?

Question: (This is obvious!) No matter what you will say, [it is Tamei]! If you require Masa, there is Masa. If you require Maga, there is Maga!

Answer: We say that there is Masa when [the Taharah] bears most [of the Tamei], and correspondingly there is Maga when [the Tamei] touches most [of the Taharah].

Question: Does the body of a Parush become like a Zav regarding Terumah [to be Metamei through Heset and Midras]?

Question (R. Yochanan - Mishnah): One who leaves an Am ha'Aretz in his house to guard it, if [the Chaver] sees those who enter and leave, the food and drink and open Kli Cheres are Tamei, but Mishkavos and Moshavos and Kli Cheres surrounded with a Tzamid Pasil are Tahor;

If you will say that they made the body [of an Am ha'Aretz] like a Zav regarding Terumah, even what is surrounded with a Tzamid Pasil would be Tamei! (Rather, they did not, and all the more so a Parush's body is not like a Zav.)

Answer (R. Yudah bar Pazi): The Mishnah discusses an Am ha'Aretz regarding [Chulin of] a Parush. You cannot learn anything [about Terumah] from it.

Rebuttal (R. Mana): So said R. Yosah, my Rebbi. The entire Mishnah discusses Terumah!

Proof (Seifa): If [the Chaver] does not see those who enter and leave, even if [the Am ha'Aretz] is immobile (cannot go by himself) or tied up, everything is Tamei.

Did they say that his hands are Tamei? (They are not Metamei inside a Tzamid Pasil!) Is it not due to Heset?! (If so, it must discuss Terumah. Chachamim did not decree Heset for Chulin.)

Support: Didn't R. Yochanan say that there are no [stringencies of] Chatzitzos (to say that an Am ha'Aretz' Kli cannot block Tum'ah), Heset and Reshus Am ha'Aretz regarding Chulin, only regarding Terumah?! (We explained this like R. SHIMSHON, Taharos 7:5.)

Question: Does the body of [one who eats] Terumah become like a Zav regarding Kodesh?

Answer: We learn from the following [Beraisa]. If one cuts a tube [to use] for Kodesh, one who cuts it or immerses it, he must immerse.

Granted, one who cuts it [must immerse, for he must touch it. Why do we obligate Tevilah for] one who immerses it? He can wrap it in a shoot (carry it via something that does not receive Tum'ah) and immerse it! Rather, he is like a Zav, and he is Metamei through carrying. Surely this applies to anyone who did not immerse for Kodesh, i.e. even one who eats Terumah.)

Rejection: It discusses one who cuts a tube for Kodesh with intent to immerse it. (Since he intended to immerse it, he did not guard it carefully. We cannot resolve our question from here.)

Question: Does the body of [one who eats] Kodesh become like a Zav regarding Chatas?

Answer: We learn from the following [Beraisa]. Two flasks, one is Tahor for Kodesh and one is Tahor for Chatas, that touched each other, both of them are Tehorim. (They are of Cheres, so they are not Metamei through touching. This is even if a person touched them together. The Kodesh flask is Metamei him, but he is not Metamei the Chatas flask. This shows that he is not considered like a Zav.)

Question (Beraisa): If one who was Tahor for Chatas moved the spit or urine of one who was Tahor for Terumah, he became Tamei. (We explained this like HA'GAON RAV C. KANIEVSKY, SHLITA.)

One who is Tahor for Terumah is like one who is Tahor for Kodesh (and his spit and urine are Metamei through Masa, like those of a Zav)!