[19a - 46 lines; 19b - 47 lines]
1)[line 3]äà îùåðä äåàHA MESHUNAH HU!- it is an unusual act [for an animal to crow in a vessel]!
2)[line 3]ãàéú áéä áæøðéD'IS BEI BIZRANEI- (the Gemara answers) [the case in one] in which there were seeds [in the vessel, and as it is therefore normal for the animal to stick its head in the vessel, it is also normal for it to crow while there]
3)[line 4]éù ùðåé ìöøåøåú ìøáéò ðæ÷YESH SHINUY LI'TZEROROS LI'REVI'A NEZEK- is one responsible for no more than one-quarter of the damage for Tzeroros that result from an unusual action? (i.e., are the factors of Chatzi Nezek that result from that which it is a Tam and that which it has caused Tzeroros multipliable by each other?)
4)[line 7]îëìì ãàéï ùðåéMI'CHELAL D'EIN SHINUY- this implies one is responsible for half of the damage [caused by Tzeroros that result from an unusual action, since otherwise Rava would have wondered whether one's responsibility for established Tzeroros increases from one-quarter to one-half]
5)[line 10]úé÷åTEIKU - An Unanswered Question
(a)The Gemara often leaves a question unanswered with the word "Teiku". The PRI MEGADIM (Igeres preceding his introduction to Orach Chaim, #9) cites three explanations for this term:
1.[this question shall remain] sealed in its container (ARUCH, Erech Tik)
2.let [the question] stand ("Tehei Ka'I"; MUSAF HA'ARUCH)
3.Tishbi Yetaretz Kushyos v'Ibayos - Eliyahu ha'Navi will answer difficulties and questions (TOSFOS YOM TOV, end of Eduyos)
6)[line 11]îé âîéø äìëä åîå÷é ìä áëç ëçåMI GAMIR HALACHAH U'MOKI LAH B'CHO'ACH KOCHO?- does he agree that a Halachah l'Moshe mi'Sinai was taught and establishes it in [a case in which the Tzeroros themselves were generated by his animal's] indirect force? (See Insights)
7)[line 16]ëàåøçééäåK'ORCHAIHU- that result from a normal action
8)[line 24]øàùåï øàùåï ìäúæä, åùðé ùðé ìäúæäRISHON, RISHON L'HATAZAH; V'SHENI, SHENI L'HATAZAH- the "first" [vessel referred to in our Mishnah] is the first one broken by the shards [that shot out from the vessel broken by the animal directly], and the "second" [vessel referred to in our Mishnah] is the second one broken by the shards [that shot out from the first vessel to be broken by shards]
9)[line 29]åáòé ìä äëéU'VA'I LAH HACHI- and he asks the question as follows. There was a tradition in which Talmudists of an earlier generation had wondered whether the Mishnah discusses a case of regular Tzeroros or those produced by an unusual action (TOSFOS DH Rav).
10)[line 33]áî÷åí ùàé àôùø ìä àìà àí ëï îðúæúMAKOM SHE'IY EFSHAR LAH ELA IM KEN MENATEZES- in a place [belonging to the Nizak] in which [there are so many Tzeroros] that it is impossible for it not to spray them
11)[line 36]åáòèä(U'VA'ATAH)- (and it kicked in an unusual manner). See Insights for the explanation of this question according to those Rishonim who are Gores this word; according to the Girsa of RASHI, this word does not appear and the question of the Gemara concerns Tzeroros that result from a normal action.
12)[line 37]ì÷øï îãîéðï ìéäL'KEREN MEDAMINAN LEI?- do we compare it to Keren [since one must pay only Chatzi Nezek, similar to a Tam]?
13)[line 37]úåìãä ãøâì äåàTOLDAH D'REGEL HU- it is a subdivision of Regel [since the animal has not acted in an unusual manner]
14)[line 38]ò÷éøä àéï ëàï äðçä éù ëàïAKIRAH EIN KAN; HANACHAH YESH KAN?- there is no uprooting [of the Tzeroros] here [in the Reshus ha'Nizak, which is the only place that one is responsible for Tzeroros]; can there then be placement [of Tzeroros in a manner that obligates the owner to pay]?
15)[line 41]äãøé áéHADRI BI- I have retracted my opinion
19b----------------------------------------19b
16)[line 1]àéï çöé ðæ÷ çìå÷EIN CHATZI NEZEK CHALUK- there is no differentiation with regards to paying half damages
17)[line 6]à÷øïA'KEREN- [only] with regard to [a Tam of] Keren
18)[line 7]øáé éäåãä ðùéàäREBBI YEHUDAH NESI'AH- Rebbi Yehudah the spiritual leader of the Jews in Eretz Yisrael, grandson of Rebbi Yehudah ha'Nasi (also known as Rebbi)
19)[line 7]à÷éìòà ãøáé éäåãäA'KIL'A D'REBBI YEHUDAH [NESI'AH]- on the porch of Rebbi Yehudah [Nesi'ah] (DIKDUKEI SOFRIM; see YA'AVETZ)
20)[line 8]ðô÷ îéìúà îáéðééäåNAFAK MILSA MI'BEINAIHU- a [Halachic] discussion arose between them
21)[line 8]ëùëùä áæðáäKISHKESHAH BI'ZENAVAH- if [an animal] wagged its tail [and thereby caused damage]
22)[line 9]åëé éàçæðä á÷øï åéìê äëéV'CHI YOCHEZENAH BI'ZENAVAH V'YELACH?- must he grab hold of its tail and walk [with it to prevent from damaging]?
23)[line 12]ëùëåù éúéøà îáòéà ìéäKISHKUCH YESEIRAH MIBAYA LEI- he asked him regarding especially strong wagging
24)[line 13]ëùëùä áàîúäKISHKESHAH B'AMASAH- if [a male animal] wagged its phallus [and thereby caused damage (which is only possible if it has an erection)]
25a)[line 14]îéãé ãäåä à÷øïMIDI D'HAVAH A'KEREN- similar to Keren
b)[line 14]÷øï ìàå éöøà ÷ú÷éó ìéäKEREN LAV YITZRA KATAKIF LEI?- does an animal not intentionally cause damage due to that which it was seized by an urge?
26)[line 18]ìà ùðåLO SHANU- we did not learn [that one is responsible for damage caused by that which is tied to the leg of his chicken]
27)[line 19]ùð÷ùø îàìéåNIKSHAR ME'ELAV- it became attached on its own
28)[line 21]àé ãàöðòéäIY D'ATZNE'EI- if he hid it away
29)[line 22]ôåùò äåàPOSHE'A HU!- he has acted in a negligent manner [and he should be fully responsible]!
30)[line 23]"ëé éôúç àéù áåø..." åìà ùåø áåø"(V')CHI YIFTACH ISH BOR..." V'LO SHOR BOR- "(And) if a man shall uncover a pit..." (Shemos 21:33) [he is responsible, which implies] and not if one's ox (or any other animal) [created] a pit
31)[line 25]áãàãééä àãåééBED'ADYEI ADUYEI- [in a case] in which [the chicken] threw [the Delil, resulting in a case of Tzeroros]
32)[line 26]áòìîà àúîøB'ALMA ITMAR- was taught regarding a different case
33)[line 29]áåøå äîúâìâì áøâìé àãí åáøâìé áäîäBORO HA'MISGALGEL B'RAGLEI ADAM UV'RAGLEI VEHEMAH- his obstacle [that he placed in a public domain] (such as a stone) that is rolled [from place to place] by the feet of people and animals [that was then tripped upon in its new location] (see 6a)
34)[line 32]ëñåúKESUS- an article of clothing
35)[line 32]îùìí çöé ðæ÷MESHALEM CHATZI NEZEK- he need only pay half-damages [since it is an unusual act and is therefore a subcategory of Keren]
36)[line 33]àí ðäðéú îùìîú îä ùðäðéúIM NEHENES, MESHALEM MAH SHE'NEHENIS- if he derived benefit, he must pay for the benefit that he derived (see 20a)
37a)[line 34]äøçáäRECHAVAH- lit. square; a public area
b)[line 34]îöãé äøçáäTZIDEI HA'RECHAVAH- the sides of the public area [that are privately owned (TSOFOS to 21a DH uv'Machzeres)]
38)[line 35]äçðåúCHANUS- a store
39a)[line 37]áäîäBEHEMAH- a domesticated animal (i.e., a cow or sheep)
b)[line 38]çéäCHAYAH- a non-domesticated animal (in this case, for example, a lion or wolf)
40)[line 38]åèøôäTARFAH- lit. ripped; killed violently
41a)[line 39]åôøä ùàëìä ùòåøéïPARAH SHE'ACHLAH SE'ORIN- a cow that ate barley (which is normally donkey food)
b)[line 39]åçîåø ùàëì ëøùéðïCHAMOR SHE'ACHAL KARSHININ- a donkey that ate a certain species of bean (prob. horse-bean) (which is normally cow food)
42a)[line 40]åëìá ùìé÷÷ àú äùîïKELEV SHE'LIKEK ES HA'SHEMEN- a dog that lapped up oil (which is normally lapped by pigs)
b)[line 40]åçæéø ùàëì çúéëä ùì áùøCHAZIR SHE'ACHEL CHATICHAH SHEL BASAR- a pig that ate a cut of meat (which is normally dog food)
43)[line 41]ò"é äãç÷AL YEDEI HA'DECHAK- in extenuating circumstances (i.e., when it was extremely hungry)
44)[line 42]ùåðøàSHUNRA- a cat
45)[line 42]úîøéTAMREI- dates
46)[line 42]åçîøàCHAMRA- a donkey
47)[line 42]áéðéúàBINISA- a fish
48)[line 43]ãàëì ðäîà åôìñéä ìñìàD'ACHAL NAHAMA U'PALSEI L'SALA- that ate bread and a) chewed; b) split the basket [that had been holding the bread]
49)[line 45]ãàëì åäãø ôìéñD'ACHAL V'HADAR PALIS- [the case was one] in which it ate [the bread] and subsequently chewed [the basket]
50)[line 46]åúáùéìTAVSHIL- a cooked dish
51)[last line]ãîèåéD'MITVI- (the Gemara answers) [the Beraisa was referring to a case] in which [the meat] was roasted
52)[last line]áèáéàB'TAVYA- [the Beraisa was referring] to a deer [which is a herbivore]
53)[last line]åáôúåøàB'PESORA- [the Beraisa was referring to a case] in which [the food items] were on a table [in which case it is unusual for an animal to take them]