Implied Halachah: This implies that, in the B'rachah of Eruv Tavshilin, one needs to mention that it will permit cooking, baking and kindling the lights ...

Ramifications: And that should one fail to mention kindling the lights, kindling more than one light will be prohibited.

Conclusion: Since the Gemara needed to mention that one kindles a light (for someone who did not make an Eiruv), it implies that someone who did not make an Eiruv is forbidden to kindle more than one light.

Question: In Shabbos (Daf 46.) everyone agrees that it is forbidden to assemble a Menorah made of pieces.

Answer #1: It speaks there about Shabbos, whereas here it is speaking about Yom-Tov, where the Chachamim are lenient, since we rule 'Ein Binyan be'Keilim.

Answer #2: Alternatively, there is speaks where the Menorah is made entirely of pieces, which one takes apart piece by piece.

Answer #2 (concl.): Whether here it speaks where it only requires to set it up slightly, since it is not made of pieces and is basically joined together.

Clarification: This does not mean that he brings forward the extinguishing, as that is no more than G'ram Kibuy (causing the extinguishing) ...

Reason: And G'ram Kibuy on Tom-Tov is permitted, even though one brings forward the extinguishing, and on Shabbos one is not Chayav either.

Clarification (cont.): But the reason is - because at the moment that one takes from it, one extinguishing it a little and dims its light, since it is not able to burn so brightly, when there is less oil in the lamp ...

Conclusion: That is why it resembles Kibuy.

Halachah: From here we can extrapolate that one is permitted to cut the bottom of a candle, seeing as at the time that one cuts it, it does not affect the light of the candle at all.

Halachah (cont.): In spite of the fact that one causes it to become extinguished, it is permitted.

Reservation: It is only permitted however, to cut it by burning it, but to cut it with a knife is prohibited according to all opinions.

Source: Since the Gemara will say later in the Mishnah (on Daf 32.) that 'One may cut it (a wick) with fire when it is placed in the mouths of two lamps.

Explanation #1: Rashi explains 'Moshier' in old French' to trim the top of the wick that has turned into charcoal.

Refutation: This is not correct however, since later in Perek Hameivi (Daf 32:) the Gemara refers to 'Mochtin es ha'Ner'. What is 'Mochtin'? removing the charcoal'. And it does not use that expression here.

Explanation #2: It therefore seems that there are two kinds of 'Chituy', one whilst it is burning, and that is the one that is mentioned later.

Explanation #2 (cont.): The other one, after it has become extinguished - where one prepares it in order that it should light up quickly, and one removes the charcoal that is on top of the wick, thereby making it easier to kindle it.

Explanation #2 (concl.): And that is the one that is mentioned here.

Implied Halachah #1: From here one should object to the women who tend to remove a burning wick and place it on the floor.

Implied Halachah #2: And also to those who cover the flame.

Question: What Heter do the people who kindle a light from one day of Yom-Tov for the next, without checking that it is already night ...

Question (cont.): And Tosfos explained earlier (DH 'u'Madlikin') that this is considered Hachanah, and one day of Yom-Tov cannot prepare for the next? (See Maharam).

Answer: Even though it is not yet night, it is nevertheless nearly dark, and still on that day one needs to kindle a light.

Clarification: Who holds "le'Chol Tzorcheichem", whereas we hold like the Rabbanan.

Question: But we Pasken later (Daf 28.) like Rebbi Yehudah?

Answer #1: The Gemara concludes there that - one may not Pasken publicly like him.

Answer #2: Alternatively, we only permit from the D'rashah of "lachem" a Melachah that is connected with food, but one that is for other uses, or to prevent the pot from getting burned, is Asur.

Explanation #1: Rashi explains that Beis Hillel permit it - like Rebbi Shimon ben Elazar, who permits a woman to fill the oven with bread ... .

Refutation #1: But this is not correct; firstly, because, if that is so, the Gemara ought to have cited Rebbi Shimon ben Elazar, since that is what they arguing over?

Refutation #2: Furthermore, it is not comparable to large loaves, so why cite it (the Beraisa) here?

Explanation #2: Tosfos therefore explains that 'Pas Merubeh' that it refers to, means more than one needs ...

Explanation #2 (cont.): With reference to exceptionally large loaves, which he bakes to use during the week, since it involves less Tircha (bother).

Support: And that is also implied in the Yerushalmi: 'Since you are troubling him, he holds back and only bakes what he needs, since a small loaf involves more Tircha in that one needs to arrange each one separately.

Explanation #2 (cont.): And both G'ritzin and Rekikin are speaking with regard to one's needs exclusively.

Explanation #2 (concl.): What's more, both are of equal thickness, only G'ritzin are large, whereas Rekikin are small.

Implied Question: And when the Gemara says shortly /'Because he indulges in unnecessary Tircha ...

Answer: It means that since he prepares large loaves, he will come to bake more than he needs for Yom-Tov (See Tosfos Pesachim, Daf 37. DH 'u'Beis Hillel').