TOSFOS DH ha'Dolfanim Parin v'Rabin mi'Bnei Adam
úåñôåú ã"ä äãåìôðéï ôøéï åøáéï îáðé àãí
(SUMMARY: Tosfos affirms the text of Rashi and the Tosefta.)
ëï âéøñú ä÷åðèøñ åëï îåëç áúåñôúà [ô''à] éåìãéï åîâãìéï îáðé àãí
Remark: This is Rashi's text, and so it is proven in the Tosefta (1:5). They give birth and raise [children] from people.
TOSFOS DH Eimar Yatzesah Rubah v'Chazrah
úåñôåú ã"ä àéîø éöúä øåáä åçæøä
(SUMMARY: Tosfos derives from here a Heter on second day Yom Tov.)
îëàï îúéøéï ì÷ðåú áéöéí (áìéì ùðé ùì éå''è ùì âìéåú çåõ îùðé) [ö"ì îå äâåééí áìéì éå"è ùðé ùì âìéåú àáì ìà áùðé - ùéèä î÷åáöú] éîéí èåáéí ùì øàù äùðä ìôé ù÷ãåùä àçú äï
Pesak: From here we permit to buy eggs from Nochrim on the second night of Yom Tov Sheni of Chutz la'Aretz (surely they came out during the day), except for the two days of Rosh Hashanah, for they are one Kedushah (and an egg laid on Yom Tov is forbidden on that day).
TOSFOS DH Tarnegoles Chaf Alaf Yom Kenegdah b'Ilan Luz
úåñôåú ã"ä úøðâåìú ë''à éåí ëðâãä áàéìï ìåæ
(SUMMARY: Tosfos gives three explanations.)
ôé' ä÷åðèøñ ÷åøãì''à ùâãìéí áå àâåæéí ÷èðéí
Explanation #1 (Rashi): This is a hazel tree, on which small nuts grow.
åøéá''à îôøù [ö"ì àéìï ùâãìéí áå - ùéèä î÷åáöú] ù÷ãéí ù÷åøéï àîðãìéé''ã ãáèðéí åù÷ãéí (áøàùéú îâ) (îúøâí éøåùìîé ìåæéí î÷ì ù÷ã (éøîéä à) îúøâí) [ö"ì áúøâåí éøåùìîé ìåæéí åëï î÷ì ù÷ã îúøâîéðï - ùéèä î÷åáöú] çåèøà ãìåæà
Explanation #2 (Riva): This is the tree on which almonds grow, called Amandlid (in old French). The Targum Yerushalmi of "Betenim u'Shekedim" is Luzim, and similarly the Targum of Makel Shaked is Chutra d'Luza.
(åé''î) [ö"ì åéù îãøù - öàï ÷ãùéí] î÷ì ù÷ã (àçã ìë''à àó îé''æ áúîåæ ìúùòä) [ö"ì àðé øåàä îä ù÷ã äåéà ë''à éåí îùòú çðéèúå òã âîø ôéøåúéå àó îé''æ áúîåæ òã - ùéèä î÷åáöú] ìè' áàá
Citation (Midrash): "Makel Shaked Ani Ro'eh" - just like almonds, there are 21 days from Chanatah (budding) until the Peros are finished, there are 21 days from the 17th of Tamuz (on which the wall of Yerushalayim was breached) until [the Churban, on] Tish'ah b'Av;
)ëï åéðàõ äù÷ã îúøâí ùéâãà îúøâí ùéâãà åéâîì ù÷ãéí îúøâí åëôéú ùâãéï) [ö"ì åáúøâåí ÷äìú åéðàõ äù÷ã (÷äìú éá) åúöéõ øéù ù÷ãåúà ááçùåúà îï ùâãéà åúøâåí åéâîì ù÷ãéí (áîãáø éæ) åëôéú ùâãéï - ùéèä î÷åáöú]
And in the Targum of Koheles "va'Yin'atz ha'Shaked" is translated "va'Satzitz Reish Shakdusa b'Vachshusa Min Shagdiya", and the Targum of "va'Yigamel Shekedim" is "v'Chapis Shegedin."
òåã (àîøéðï åéðàõ äù÷ã æä ìåæ ùì ùãøä îîðä òúéãéí îúéí ìäçéåú ìòúéã ìáà ìåæ úøâåí ùì ù÷ã) [ö"ì àîøå áîãøù åéðàõ äù÷ã æäå ìåæ ùì ùãøä åáîãøù îôåøù âáé åéðàõ äù÷ã ùîîðä òúéãéí îúéí ìäçéåú ìòúéã ìáà åäéà ÷ìéáåñú ãùáú ôø÷ ùåàì (÷ðá.) àìà ùáîãøù ÷øé ìéä ìåæ òì ùí - ùéèä î÷åáöú äù÷ã] (åé÷øà øáä)
Further, they said in the Midrash "va'Yin'atz ha'Shaked" - this is Luz of the spine, and it is explicit in the Midrash regarding "va'Yin'atz ha'Shaked" that from it the future the dead will be revived from it. It is Klivoses [mentioned] in Shabbos (152a), but in the Midrash it is called Luz due to Shaked.
TOSFOS DH b'Ilan Tut
úåñôåú ã"ä áàéìï úåú
(SUMMARY: Tosfos discusses when the Brachah is Borei Peri ha'Etz.)
àéï øàéä îëàï ùîáøëéï òìéäï áåøà ôøé äòõ
Implied suggestion: This proves that one blesses Borei Peri ha'Etz on them. .
ãäëé )àîøéðï áàéìï ãâï) [ö"ì ðîé àîøéðï áàéìï úáåàä - ùéèä î÷åáöú]
Rejection: We say also "the Ilan on which grain grows" (and we never bless on grain Borei Peri ha'Etz).
(ãàúéà) [ö"ì àò"ô ùôé' ä÷åðèøñ - ùéèä î÷åáöú] ëî''ã (áøëåú ãó î.) òõ ùàëì îîðå àãí äøàùåï çèä äéúä àìîà ÷øé ìúáåàä (àéìï åìà îáøëéï áäí) [ö"ì îéï àéìï î"î ìòðéï áøëä ìà îùèîè áùåí ãåëúà ùéáøëå áëåññ çèä áåøà - ùéèä î÷åáöú] ôøé äòõ
And even though Rashi explained like the opinion that the tree from which Adam ha'Rishon ate was wheat, this shows that grain is called a kind of tree, in any case regarding Brachah we do not find anywhere that one who eats wheat blesses [Borei] Peri ha'Etz!
åîéäå úåúéí äâãìéí áàéìï îáøëéï ôøé äòõ àáì ìà àúåúé ùãä ãàé ù÷ìú ìôéøà ìà äãø âååæà åîôé÷ åàéï îáøëéï ôøé äòõ àìà ëé äãø âååæà åîôé÷
Distinction: However, Tut that grow on a tree, one blesses Borei Peri ha'Etz, but not on Tut Sadeh (strawberries), for if you take the fruit, the branch will not produce more. One blesses Borei Peri ha'Etz only when the branch returns to produce more.
TOSFOS DH Bardelas
úåñôåú ã"ä áøãìñ
(SUMMARY: Tosfos discusses what this is.)
ô''ä àôà
Explanation #1 (Rashi): This is Afa.
åô''÷ ãñðäãøéï (ãó èå:) ô''ä ôåèå''ù
Explanation #2 (Rashi in Sanhedrin 15b): It is Putush (a polecat).
åñåó ô''÷ ãá''÷ (ãó èæ.) [àîøéðï] áøãìñ [æå] àôà (åàîøéðï öáåò æä àôà åâéà) [ö"ì åöáåò æäå àôòä ùäøé âéà - öàï ÷ãùéí] äöáåòéí (ù''à éâ) îúøâí îéùø àôòéà
Support (for Explanation #1): In Bava Kama (16a) we say that Bardelas is Afa, and we say that Tzavu'a is Af'ah, for the Targum of Gei ha'Tzevu'im is Mishor Af'aya. (Tosfos holds that Afa and Af'ah are the same, for he showed that Tzavu'a is Af'ah, and it says in Bava Kama 16a that Tzavu'a is Afa. Tosfos explicitly said so in Sanhedrin 15b.)
îéäå áøãìñ ãäëà îùîòå ãäåà ëòéï ôåèå''ù åéåìã ìùìù ùðéí îãùéðä àôòä ìùáòéí ùðä åá' îéðé áøãìñ äï
Retraction (of support): Here, Bardelas connotes that it is like Putush, and it gives birth after three years, since it changed (after initially teaching Bardelas, it teaches that) Af'ah give birth after 70 years. (If it is Af'ah, why did it use two different names?! Rather, there are two kinds of Bardelas.
TOSFOS DH ha'Kuf veha'Kifuf
úåñôåú ã"ä ä÷åó åä÷éôåó
(SUMMARY: Tosfos explains that there is a Chayah and birds called Kifuf.)
îéï çéä äåà îãçùéá )ìäå) [ö"ì ìéä - âîøà òåæ åäãø] áäãé ôéì
Explanation: [Kifuf] is a kind of Chayah, since it was taught with an elephant.
åàîø ô' äøåàä (áøëåú ãó ðæ:) ëì îéðé çéåú éôéï ìçìåí çåõ îï äôéì åä÷éôåó
Support #1: It says in Brachos (57b) that all kinds of Chayos are good [if one sees them] in a dream, except for an elephant or Kifuf.
åô' äîôìú (ðãä ãó ëâ.) àîøéðï ì''à ø''î [ö"ì á÷øàé å÷éôåôà - öàï ÷ãùéí, ç÷ ðúï] àåîø äåàéì åòéðéäí äåìëéí ìôðéäí ëùì àãí åäåà ëåñ åéðùåó (åé÷øà éà) îúøâí ÷øéà å÷ôåôà
Support #2: In Nidah (23a) we say that R. Meir said [that there is Tum'as Leidah for non-human forms] only for Karya and Kifufa, since their eyes face forward, like those of people. This is Kos and Yanshuf; the Targum of them is Karya and Kifufa.
åéù ÷ôåó àçø îéï òåó ôø÷ àìå èøéôåú (çåìéï ãó ñâ.) àîø úðùîú áàåú ùáòåôåú åàîø áàåú ùáòåôåú ÷ôåó
Observation: There is another Kifuf that is a kind of bird. In Chulin (63a, a Beraisa) says that Tinshames is the ugliest of the birds, and [Abaye] says that the ugliest of the birds is Kifuf.
åéù âøñ ÷éôåã áãì''ú ò''ã åéøùåä ÷àú å÷éôåã (éùòéä ìã)
Disclaimer: Some texts [there] say Kipod with a Dalet, like "vi'Yreshuha Ka'as v'Kipod."
åàé âøñ ÷éôåó åúøé âååðé ÷éôåó éù áòåôåú à''ë ëé îôøù áàåú ùáòåôåú ÷ôåó åäéëé éãòðà áäå àé àééøé áéðùåó àå áúðùîú
Question: If the text is Kifuf, and there are two kinds of birds called Kifuf, if so, when [Abaye] explains that the ugliest of the birds is Kifuf, how do we know that if this is Yanshuf or Tinshames? (Do not say that he relies on the Beraisa, and merely teaches that Tinshames is Kifuf. If so, why did he mention "the ugliest...."?)
TOSFOS DH Benos Shu'ach
úåñôåú ã"ä áðåú ùåç
(SUMMARY: Tosfos distinguish different species of figs.)
òì îùðä ãùáéòéú ùìäï áùðéä (ùáéòéú ô''ä î''à) ôé' áéøåùìîé áëì ùðä çåðèéï áä ôéøåú åôéøåú ùçåðèéï áùðä àçú àéï ðâîøéï òã ùìù ùðéí
Reference: Regarding the Mishnah "Shevi'is of Benos Shu'ach is the second year", the Yerushalmi explains that every year fruits have Chanatah (budding) on the tree, and fruits that burned in one year are not finished until the third year. (Therefore, Benos Shu'ach that finished two years into the Shemitah cycle, they budded in Shemitah.)
åìà ëôé' ø''ç ùôéøù âáé ì' àéìðåú ìà îô÷éï áëì ùúà àìà (òùøéí) [ö"ì òùøä - ùéèä î÷åáöú, öàï ÷ãùéí] îðééäå ëâåï áðåú ùåç ìâ' ùðéí
This is unlike R. Chananel, who explained 30 trees, and each year only 10 of them produce [Peros], e.g. Benos Shu'ach in three years.
åô''÷ ãò''æ (ãó éã.) âøñ îåëññéí áðåú ùåç îéï àçã åëï ùîå
Citation: In Avodah Zarah 14a, the text says [that they added to species to which Shemitah applies] "Muchsasim Benos Shu'ach." It is one species. This is its name. (Yad Binyamin says that our text of Tosfos is errant. Shitah Mekubetzes (Mahaduras Rav Ilan) brings that Tosfos' text was Muchsasim u'Benos Shu'ach; the prefix Vav shows that they are two species. He brings the text without a Vov in the name of Rashi and R. Tam. Tosfos brings below a source that Benos Shu'ach are not esteemed, and a source that they are esteemed. According to R. Tam, we can say that Stam Benos Shu'ach are esteemed, but the subspecies Muchsasim is not.)
å÷ùä áîñëú ãîàé (ô''à î''à) úðï ä÷ìéï ùáãîàé ìà ðçùãå òîé äàøõ òìéäï îùîò ãìàå ôéøé çùåá ðéðäå
Question: In Demai (1:1), a Mishnah teaches "the leniencies of Demai - Amei ha'Aretz are not suspected about them." This connotes that they are not important Peros;
åô''÷ ãîñëú ò''æ (ãó éã.) îôøù úàéðé çéåøúà åôø÷ â' ãðãøéí (ãó ëæ.) (áðåú ùáò åúàðéí ìáðéí ùðé îéðéï ãàîø àéìå äééúé éåãò ùáðåú ùáò áúåê ëìëìä) [ö"ì îùîò áðåú ùáò åúàðéí ìáðéí ùðé îéðéï äí ãàîø àéìå äééúé éåãò ùáðåú ùáò äí áúåê äëìëìä - ùéèä î÷åáöú] äééúé àåîø úàðéí ìáðåú åùçåøåú àñåøåú áðåú ùáò îåúøåú)
And in Avodah Zarah (14a), it explains white figs, and in Nedarim (27a) it connotes that Benos Sheva and white figs are two species, for it says "had I known that Benos Sheva are in the basket, I would have said 'white and black figs are forbidden, and Benos Sheva are permitted'"! (I.e. people desire them.)
åðøàä áðåú ùåç åùáò îéðé úàðéí äï àìà ùáðåú ùåç øòåú ëãîùîò áîúðé' ãä÷ìéï ùáãîàé åáääéà ãùáéòéú ëñáåø ùàéï ùáéòéú ðåäâ áäï
Answer: Benos Shu'ach and [Benos] Sheva are kinds of figs, but Benos Shu'ach are bad, like the Mishnah "the leniencies of Demai" connotes, and the [teaching about] Shevi'is shows that [initially, Chachamim] held that Shemitah does not apply to them;
åáðåú ùáò éôåú ëãîùîò )áùáéòéú ô''ä) [ö"ì áùáåòåú éá. - ùéèä î÷åáöú] åáðãøéí (ãó ëæ.) åîñúîà àãí îï äéôåú àëì
Benos Sheva are good, like it connotes in Shavu'os (12a) and Nedarim (27a) (it says that Adam ha'Rishon ate from them), and presumably, he ate from the good ones;
åð÷øàå ùáò îï ùáòú éîé àáìåú (åùåç) [ö"ì åîä ùð÷øàå äøòåú áðåú åùåç òì ùí - ùéèä î÷åáöú] ùâøîå ùåçä åúåìéï ä÷ì÷ìä áî÷åì÷ì
They are called Sheva due to the seven days of Aveilus that they caused. The bad ones are called Bnos Shu'ach because they caused Shuchah (a pitfall). We attribute the ruin to what is ruined.
TOSFOS DH u'Mai Ninhu Chamor mi'Chatul
úåñôåú ã"ä åîàé ðéðäå çîåø îçúåì
(SUMMARY: Tosfos explains why we do not learn from a dog.)
ãçúåì ìð''á éåí
Explanation: A cat's [gestation] is 52 days.
åúéîä ìî''ã ëìá îéï çéä ëãàéúà áîñëú áéöä (ãó ëä:) ùìùä òæéï äï ëìá [áçéåú] ìð÷åè çîåø îëìá ãî÷åì÷ì èôé ùäëìá ìð' éåí
Question: According to the opinion that a dog is a kind of Chayah, like it says in Beitzah (25b) "there are three brazen [animals] - a dog among Chayos...", it should mention a donkey, [and then the snake will be] even more ruined, for a dog's[gestation] is only 50 days!
é''ì îðéï æä îëååï èôé ãäåé ùðéí:
Answer: This calculation [based on a cat] works out to be [an even number of] years.
8b----------------------------------------8b
TOSFOS DH Echad l'Shalosh u'Mai Ninhu Ez mi'Chatul
úåñôåú ã"ä àçã ìùìù åîàé ðéðäå òæ îçúåì
(SUMMARY: Tosfos explains why we did not use the ratio of a goat to a dog.)
äëà ðéçà èôé ìîð÷è òæ îëìá ìî''ã (ëìàéí ô''ç î''å) îéï çéä ìôé ùäçùáåï ùìäï îëååï èôé àçã ìùìù
Implied question: Here it would be better to say a goat [is three times more cursed ]than a dog, according to the opinion that [a dog] it is a kind of Chayah, for the calculation would be more precise (a dog is 50 days, and a goat is five months, i.e. 150 days)!
àìà ðéçà ìéä ìîéôøê ëëåìé òìîà:
Answer: He prefers to ask according to everyone (i.e. even if a dog is a Behemah).