[59a - 24 lines; 59b - 51 lines]

*********************GIRSA SECTION*********************

We recommend using the textual changes suggested by the Bach and the marginal notes of the Vilna Shas. This section is devoted to any other important corrections that Acharonim have pointed out in the Gemara, Rashi and Tosfos.

[1] Gemara 59a [line 11]:

"Asiri Hu d'Lo Karyei"

Rashi's Girsa is "Asiri Lo Karyei"

[2] Rashi 59a DH Iskish " :

The words "v'Es Ma'asroseichem"

should be "Aser Te'aser" (as is found in Rashi Kesav Yad, Rabeinu Gershom, and as quoted by Tosfos in the name of Rashi)

[3] Gemara 59b [line 12]:

The words "v'Af Al Gav d'Lo Ne'ekar ... Su Lo Midi" ...

should be "Af Al Gav d'Lo Ne'ekar... v'Su Lo Midi" ...

[4] Rashi 59b DH Af ha'Teshi'I : "

The words "veha'Din Nosen"

are a new Dibur

[5] Rashi DH Achad Asar d'Ivrar Lei Asiri " :

The words "ul'Hachi Din Hu"

should be "l'Hachi Din Hu"

[6] Rashi DH Minyan ha'Ra'uy Poter " :

The words "Mishum d'Havu Minyan ha'Ra'uy

are a new Dibur, which belongs after DH l'Sochan (and are referring to the Gemara's proof from our Mishnah) (TZON KODASHIM)

[7] Rashi DH veha'She'ar " :

The words "b'Fesach Echad"

should be "b'Fesach Acher" (RASHASH)


1)[line 7] ASIRI ME'ELAV HU KADOSH- the tenth becomes sanctified as Ma'aser on its own [even if the owner did not pronounce it Ma'aser]

2)[line 14] IVRAR LEI ASIRI- it was clarified that it was the tenth and Ma'aser (since it walked out after the ninth)

3)[line 15] ACHVI ILAVEI- he pointed to it

4)[line 19] IFTERU B'MINYAN HA'RA'UY- they became exempt from Ma'aser since their ten-count was fit to be completed


5)[line 1] '' ELA IM KEN NE'EKAR SHEM ASIRI HEIMENU- unless the designation of "ten" was uprooted from the tenth animal by calling it "nine." The reasoning for this is that it is impossible for two animals to both be the tenth animal.