[59a - 24 lines; 59b - 51 lines]
*********************GIRSA SECTION*********************
We recommend using the textual changes suggested by the Bach and the marginal notes of the Vilna Shas. This section is devoted to any other important corrections that Acharonim have pointed out in the Gemara, Rashi and Tosfos.
[1] Gemara 59a [line 11]:
"Asiri Hu d'Lo Karyei" òùéøé äåà ãìà ÷øééä
Rashi's Girsa is "Asiri Lo Karyei" òùéøé ìà ÷øééä
[2] Rashi 59a DH Iskish ã"ä àéú÷ù:
The words "v'Es Ma'asroseichem" åàú îòùøåúéëí
should be "Aser Te'aser" òùø úòùø (as is found in Rashi Kesav Yad, Rabeinu Gershom, and as quoted by Tosfos in the name of Rashi)
[3] Gemara 59b [line 12]:
The words "v'Af Al Gav d'Lo Ne'ekar ... Su Lo Midi" åàó òì âá ãìà ðò÷ø... úå ìà îéãé
should be "Af Al Gav d'Lo Ne'ekar... v'Su Lo Midi" àó òì âá ãìà ðò÷ø... åúå ìà îéãé
[4] Rashi 59b DH Af ha'Teshi'I : ã"ä àó äúùéòé
The words "veha'Din Nosen" åäãéï ðåúï
are a new Dibur
[5] Rashi DH Achad Asar d'Ivrar Lei Asiri ã"ä àçã òùø ãàéáøø ìéä òùéøé:
The words "ul'Hachi Din Hu" åìäëé ãéï äåà
should be "l'Hachi Din Hu" ìäëé ãéï äåà
[6] Rashi DH Minyan ha'Ra'uy Poter ã"ä îðéï äøàåé ôåèø:
The words "Mishum d'Havu Minyan ha'Ra'uy îùåí ãäåå îðéï äøàåé
are a new Dibur, which belongs after DH l'Sochan ìúåëï (and are referring to the Gemara's proof from our Mishnah) (TZON KODASHIM)
[7] Rashi DH veha'She'ar ã"ä åäùàø:
The words "b'Fesach Echad" áôúç àçã
should be "b'Fesach Acher" áôúç àçø (RASHASH)
*******************************************************
1)[line 7]òùéøé îàìéå äåà ÷ãåùASIRI ME'ELAV HU KADOSH- the tenth becomes sanctified as Ma'aser on its own [even if the owner did not pronounce it Ma'aser]
2)[line 14]àéáøø ìéä òùéøéIVRAR LEI ASIRI- it was clarified that it was the tenth and Ma'aser (since it walked out after the ninth)
3)[line 15]àçåé òéìåéäACHVI ILAVEI- he pointed to it
4)[line 19]àéôèøå áîðéï äøàåéIFTERU B'MINYAN HA'RA'UY- they became exempt from Ma'aser since their ten-count was fit to be completed
59b----------------------------------------59b
5)[line 1]àìà à''ë ðò÷ø ùí òùéøé äéîðåELA IM KEN NE'EKAR SHEM ASIRI HEIMENU- unless the designation of "ten" was uprooted from the tenth animal by calling it "nine." The reasoning for this is that it is impossible for two animals to both be the tenth animal.