Question: R. Akiva said below (81b) that all blood that enters inside is Pasul.

Answer: Shirayim are not Mechaper according to R. Akiva, and we do not apply to them "Lechaper ba'Kodesh."

Question (R. Chaim): Below (81a), we say about Dam Chatas that became mixed with Dam Olah, about which R. Eliezer and Rabanan, Abaye said "this is only regarding the beginning (i.e. blood for Matanos) of Chatas and Olah, but the end (Shirayim) of Chatas and beginning of Olah, all agree that (we throw it, for) it the place of [Matanos] Olah is the place of Shirayim";

Explanation: If Shirei Chatas became mixed with the beginning of Olah, all agree that he puts it below Chut ha'Sikra, for the place of initial Matanah of Olah is Kosher for Shirei Chatas. He throws them at the wall of the Mizbe'ach, and automatically they drip to the Yesod, and there is no Shinuy Makom.

Citation (81a - Rav Yosef): Rav Yehudah said that Shirayim require a platform.

Explanation: This means that he pours literally onto the roof of the Yesod, which is made like a platform, and he does not throw them at the vertical wall [of the Mizbe'ach] like the law of Olah;

Inference: Olah does not require the roof of the Yesod!

Answer: This that we require the roof of the Yesod for initial [Matanos of] Olah is only to exclude the bottom Amah of the Mizbe'ach from the ground until it recesses (the Mizbe'ach gets thinner at a height of one Amah);

However, the erect wall until the Yesod, obviously it is better regarding Olah than the roof of the Yesod, for we require two Matanos that are four (i.e. Zerikah at the erect wall, on two opposite corners).

Reference: Above (40b), regarding "v'Asah la'Par Ka'asher Asah", we expound Semichah and Shirayim in Par Yom Kipur.

Question: According to this Tana [here], what is his source for Semichah? There we explained (40a DH li'Semichah. In Toras Kohanim, it expounds "v'Samach Al Rosh ha'Par", to include Par Yom Kipur for Semichah.)

Question: You cannot learn from Par Kohen Mashi'ach, for it atones for transgressing a known Mitzvah, like it asks above (40b)!

Answer: He relies on this that it comes through a Kal v'Chomer from Se'irei Regalim and Se'irei Roshei Chodoshim, for something learned from a Hekesh returns to teach through a Kal v'Chomer.

Explanation: We should not say that the Torah toiled to write a verse [even though it is not needed at all] when it is possible to expound it.

Question: If so, how did we ask above (38a) "I can say that v'Chiper even if he did not put blood above, rather, below"?

Answer #1: He would expound "Osah" for a different Drashah, like it expounds above (10b) "[Chatas] is above, and another is not above."

Answer #2: He would expound '"Osah" he will eat it, but [if he put the blood below] he will not eat it', but in any case he atoned.

Remark: Shmuel's teaching above (26b) "once blood reached the Mizbe'ach, he atoned" does not apply here.

Explanation (Rashi): Regarding Chatas ha'Of it is written "Hi" - if he deviated, he disqualified.

Question: Also regarding Chatas Behemah it is written "Hi". We should likewise say that if he deviated, he disqualified it!

Question: Olas ha'Of, [its blood] is destined to drip below, and a Mishnah below (66a) teaches that if he did them below, in any way (like Chatas ha'Of or Olas ha'Of) it is Pasul!

Remark: This itself, we do not know the source (that below, in any way it is Pasul).