1)

(a)Our Mishnah (which confines Machsheves P'sul to whoever performs the Avodah) does not go like Rebbi Elazar b'Rebbi Yossi. What does Rebbi Elazar b'Rebbi Yossi in a Beraisa say about the owner of a Korban being Mefagel?

(b)How does he learn this from the Pasuk in Sh'lach-l'cha (in connection with the Nesachim) "Vehikriv ha'Makriv Korbano la'Hashem"?

(c)Abaye points out that Rebbi Eliezer and Rebbi Shimon ben Elazar hold similar views to Rebbi Elazar b'Rebbi Yossi. The Tana Kama of a Mishnah in Chulin permits an animal that a Yisrael Shechts on behalf of a Nochri. On what grounds does Rebbi Eliezer disagree?

(d)And what does Rebbi Shimon ben Elazar say about Reuven who carries into the street on Shabbos less than the Shi'ur of an article that Shimon put away (because he considers it Chashuv)?

1)

(a)Our Mishnah (which confines Machsheves P'sul to whoever performs the Avodah) does not go like Rebbi Elazar b'Rebbi Yossi, who rules in a Beraisa that - the owner of a Korban can also be Mefagel.

(b)And he learns this from the Pasuk in Sh'lach-l'cha (in connection with the Nesachim) "Vehikriv ha'Makriv Korbano la'Hashem" - since the Pasuk (which is talking about the owner bringing his Korban with the appropriate Nesachim) refers to him as 'ha'Makriv'.

(c)Abaye points out that Rebbi Eliezer and Rebbi Shimon ben Elazar hold similar views to Rebbi Elazar b'Rebbi Yossi. The Tana Kama of a Mishnah in Chulin permits an animal that a Yisrael Shechts on behalf of a Nochri. Rebbi Eliezer disagrees - because he takes into account the Machshavah of the owner, whose S'tam Machshavah is for Avodah-Zarah.

(d)And Rebbi Shimon ben Elazar rules that if Reuven carries out into the street on Shabbos less than the Shi'ur of an article that Shimon put away (because he considers it Chashuv) - he is Chayav.

2)

(a)On what grounds do we presume that ...

1. ... both Rebbi Eliezer and Rebbi Shimon ben Elazar hold like Rebbi Elazar b'Rebbi Yossi?

2. ... Rebbi Elazar b'Rebbi Yossi does not hold like them?

(b)And why do we presume that Rebbi Shimon ben Elazar holds like Rebbi Eliezer, but not vice-versa?

2)

(a)We presume that ...

1. ... both Rebbi Eliezer and Rebbi Shimon ben Elazar hold like Rebbi Elazar b'Rebbi Yossi - because if they hold that Reuven is Chayav on account of Simon's Machshavah ba'Chutz, how much more so bi'Fenim (by Korbanos, where the main Din of Machshavah is written).

2. ... Rebbi Elazar b'Rebbi Yossi does not hold like them - because, since he only issued his ruling bi'Fenim (in connection with Kodshim), he probably does not hold of it in areas of Chulin.

(b)And we presume that Rebbi Shimon ben Elazar holds like Rebbi Eliezer, but not vice-versa - because with regard to Shabbos, the Torah requires "Meleches Machsheves" (that the person who performs the Melachah means what he is doing). Consequently, someone who applies the principle of 'Nischayev Zeh be'Machshavto shel Zeh' on Shabbos (in spite of Meleches Machsheves), will certainly apply it by Avodas-Kochavim (which is even compared to Avodas P'nim regarding the Avodos for which one is Chayav), but not vice-versa.

Hadran alach 'Beis Shamai'

Perek Eizehu Mekoman

3)

(a)Our Mishnah discusses the location where Kodshei Kodshim are Shechted. Kodshei Kodshim incorporates four types of Korban. Three of them are Chatas, Asham and Olah. What is the fourth

(b)The first Korbanos discussed are Par ve'Sa'ir shel Yom ha'Kipurim. Which other Avodah besides the Shechitah requires Tzafon?

(c)In which three locations is their blood sprinkled?

(d)From where do we learn that they (as well as all Kodshim) require the blood to be received in a K'li Shareis?

3)

(a)Our Mishnah discusses the location where Kodshei Kodshim are Shechted. Kodshei Kodshim incorporates Chatas, Asham, Olah - and Zivchei Shalmei Tzibur (that are brought on Shavu'os).

(b)The first Korbanos discussed are Par ve'Sa'ir shel Yom ha'Kipurim. Besides the Shechitah - the Kabalas ha'Dam too requires Tzafon.

(c)Their blood is sprinkled - between the poles of the Aron, towards the Paroches and on the Mizbe'ach ha'Zahav.

(d)We learn that they (as well as all Kodshim) require the blood to be received in a K'li Shareis - from Har Sinai, where the Torah writes that Moshe received the blood in bowls and to which all other Korbanos are compared.

4)

(a)Where did the Kohen Gadol pour the Shirayim after all the Haza'os on Yom Kipur?

(b)What distinction does the Mishnah draw between the Haza'os and the pouring of the Shirayim?

4)

(a)After all the Haza'os, the Kohen Gadol poured the Shirayim on Yom Kipur - on the western Y'sod of the Mizbe'ach ha'Chitzon.

(b)The distinction the Mishnah draws between the Haza'os and the pouring of the Shirayim is that - whereas even one Haza'ah is crucial to the Avodah, the pouring of the Shirayim is not.

5)

(a)What distinction does the Tana draw between the Avodah of the Par ve'Sa'ir shel Yom ha'Kipurim and that of the Parim and Se'irim ha'Nisrafin?

(b)Where is the Shirayim of the latter poured?

(c)Where are the bodies of all the above burned?

5)

(a)The distinction between the Avodah of the Par ve'Sa'ir shel Yom ha'Kipurim and that of the Parim and Se'irim ha'Nisrafin is that - the blood of the former is sprinkled in the Kodesh Kodashim, whereas the blood of the latter is not, as we just learned.

(b)The Shirayim of the latter is poured - on the western Y'sod of the Mizbe'ach ha'Chitzon (like the Par ve'Sa'ir shel Yom ha'Kipurim).

(c)The bodies of all the above are burned - outside Yerushalayim, on the Shefech ha'Deshen (the location to which the ashes of the Mizbe'ach are takend when they accumulate on the Ma'arachah).

47b----------------------------------------47b

6)

(a)We ascribe the fact that our Mishnah does not mention ve'Kibul Daman bi'Cheli Shareis ba'Tzafon by Kodshei Kodshim, to the Asham Metzora. What does this mean?

(b)Then why does the Tana mention it later in the very Mishnah which deals with Asham Nazir and Asham Metzora?

(c)What does the Beraisa learn from the Pasuk in Metzora ...

1. ... "Ve'lakach ha'Kohen mi'Dam ha'Asham ... Ve'nasan al T'nuch ... "?

2. ... "Ki ka'Chatas ha'Asham hu"?

6)

(a)We ascribe the fact that our Mishnah does not mention ve'Kibul Daman bi'Cheli Shareis ba'Tzafon by Kodshei Kodshim, to the Asham Metzora - which belongs to the category of Kodshei Kodshim, yet its blood has to be received in the Kohen's palm, and not in a K'li Shareis.

(b)The Tana nevertheless mentions it later together with Asham Nazir - because part of its blood does have to be received in a K'li Shareis (as we will now see).

(c)The Beraisa learns from the Pasuk in Metzora ...

1. ... "Velakach ha'Kohen mi'Dam ha'Asham ... Venasan al T'nuch ... " that - just as "Venasan" has to be done with the hands, so too does "Velakach".

2. ... "Ki ka'Chatas ha'Asham hu" that - the blood of the Asham Metzora, just like that of the Chatas, has to be received in a K'li Shareis.

7)

(a)How do we resolve this apparent discrepancy?

(b)What actually happens? How do they apply both D'rashos?

7)

(a)We resolve this apparent discrepancy - by establishing the first Drashah with regard to the blood that the Kohen places on the various locations of the Metzora's body, and the second, to the blood that is sprinkled on the Mizbe'ach.

(b)In fact - two Kohanim receive the blood of the Asham Metzora, one with his palms, the other, with a bowl. The latter carries it to the Mizbe'ach, the former, takes the blood in his palm to the Metzora.

OTHER D.A.F. RESOURCES
ON THIS DAF