Implied Question: This is despite the fact that we already know that this only applies to those who are fit to testify. (Why did the Mishnah repeat this if was already stated in a previous Mishnah?)

Answer: It has to say this here as well to teach that even if there are three witnesses, and two of them are valid, they are exempt. This is because a group of witnesses that has been partially invalidated is totally invalidated. The source for this is the Tosfos of Rabeinu Moshe.

Implied Question: This is despite the fact that someone who pronounces the name of Hash-m as it is written has no portion in the world to come.

Answer: Perhaps if he does not have intent for the name of Hash-m this is permitted. The source for this as well is the Tosfos of Rabeinu Moshe.

Opinion: The letters "Alef" and "Daled" from the name of Hash-m may not be erased.

Question: This is difficult. Why is this different than the letters "Tzadi" and "Veis" from "Tzivakos" and the letters "Shin" and "Daled" from "Shakai" that can be erased (before the entire word is spelled out) because they do not form an entire name of Hash-m?

Answer: Perhaps because it is the special name of Hash-m there is reason to be more stringent.

Text: The law does not follow Rebbi Yosi.

Implied Question: The Gemara needed to say this. (Why? Isn't it obvious that if he argues with the Tana Kama/Chachamim that the law does not follow him?)

Answer: This is in order that we should not say the law follows him anyway, as his reasoning is always with him (see Gitin 67a).

Text: This is also the text of the Rach.

Explanation: Whenever they asked they did not say, "If I should stop" besides the last time they asked. This (last time) is as the Pasuk says, "Should I continue to go to war with my brother Binyamin, or should I stop?"

Explanation: This is referring to going out to an optional war.

Question: This is difficult. Why doesn't he derive this from Shevuas ha'Pikadon using the Gezeirah Shaveh of "Secheta?" If you will say that this is because the main teaching it must learn is "Just as here this is with a name of Hash-m etc." even so, when the Gemara later asks how the Rabbanan know that Alah refers to Shevuah, why don't we derive this from Pikadon!