(Mishnah): [The following are choked -] one who prophesizes in the name of idolatry, even if he gives correct laws (e.g. of Tum'ah and Taharah);

One who has Bi'ah with a married woman, once she entered her husband's premises for Nisu'in, even though she did not have Bi'ah [with her husband], someone else who has Bi'ah with her receives Chenek;

Edim Zomemim [who falsely testified about Zenus] of a [married] Bas Kohen was Mezanah and the man who had Bi'ah with her - all Zomemim get the same Misah [they plotted to impose on someone else], except when they falsely testified about a Bas Kohen and her Bo'el.

(Gemara - R. Yosi ben Chaninah): Everything was included in "Ach ha'Navi Asher Yazid Ledaber Davar bi'Shmi Asher Lo Tzivisiv Ledaber", whether he gives a sign or a wonder, whether [he says to change] idolatry or other Mitzvos (ALEI TAMAR);

However, idolatry was taught [separately, for] whether he intends to uproot the entire [Mitzvah], or he did not intend to uproot all, R. Shimon holds that we choke him, and Chachamim say that we stone him;

However, for all other Mitzvos, if he uproots the entire Mitzvah, Chachamim say that we choke him, and R. Shimon exempts him. If he did not intend to uproot all of it, Chachamim and R. Shimon agree that he is exempt. (TZAFNAS PANE'ACH, HAGAHOS R. DINAR)

A Navi who prophecizes initially (before he was established to be a Navi) - if he gave a sign or wonder (or his prediction was fulfilled), we heed him. If not, we do not heed him.

If two Nevi'im prophecized [initially] about the same matter, or close to the same matter, Rav Yitzchak and R. Hoshayah - one said that he must give a sign or wonder. The other said that he need not give a sign or wonder.

Question (the opinion that he must give, against the opinion that he need not): It says "va'Yomer Chizkiyah Mah Os"! (Even though Yeshayahu was an established Navi, since he previously said that Chizkiyah will die, to say otherwise was like a Navi from the beginning.)

Answer: There is different, for that was a matter [great like] of Techiyas ha'Mesim (since he already prophecized that he will die) - "Yechayeinu mi'Yomayim ba'Yom ha'Shelishi Yekimenu v'Nichyeh Lefanav."

(R. Yudah bar Pazi): [An Arusah's Misah descends to Chenek] not only after Chupah, rather, even once she enters a house in which there is a Chupah.

This is like the following. There is a big house, and a small room of the house, and the Chupah is in the room, and she entered the house. (It is as if she is in the room, and she is already Nesu'ah.)

Question: For which matter [is she already Nesu'ah]?

Answer #1 (R. Yochanan): He inherits her.

Answer #2 (Reish Lakish): It is to annul her vows.

(R. Ze'ira): Even though Reish Lakish said to annul her vows, he agrees that he cannot annul until she enters the Chupah. (Once she enters the house, she leaves her father's Reshus, and he is not a partner in annulling her vows.)

Support (for Reish Lakish - Rav Huna): "Liznos Beis Aviha" - this excludes when the father's Sheluchim handed her over to the husband's Sheluchim. She does not get Skilah, rather, Chenek. (Likewise, we no longer apply to her "bi'N'ureha Beis Aviha", in the Parshah of a father annulling.)

[When do Edim Zomemin get the same Misah? It is when the Bo'el gets the same Misah as she does. If [the corresponding man, i.e. the Bo'el] gets Sereifah like [the Niv'eles], he and they (Edim Zomemin) get Sereifah. If he gets Skilah like her, he and they get Skilah. If he gets Chenek [and she is a Bas Kohen], she gets Sereifah and he and [the witnesses] get Chenek.