(R. Yosa citing R. Yochanan): If one slaughtered a lamb Ba'al Mum [to idolatry], he is liable.

What is the source of this? It is like R. Heila said, "Lo Sa'asun Ken la'Shem Elokeichem" - everything to Hash-m Elokeichem, do not do [to idolatry].

Question (R. Bun bar Chiyah, to R. Zeirah): "Lo Sishtachaveh Lahem" is a Prat. "Lo Sa'avdem" is a Klal. "Ki Lo Sishtachaveh l'El Acher" is another Klal. From a Klal u'Ferat u'Chlal, only the Prat is included in the Klal!

Question (R. Bun bar Kahana, to R. Heila): "Lo Sa'asun" is a Klal. "Zove'ach la'Elohim Yacharam" is a Prat. "Bilti la'Shem Levado" is another Klal. Everything [similar to the Prat] is included in the Klal. This includes hugging and kissing!

Answer (R. Heila): Why was Hishtachava'ah written? Was it not to teach about itself, that it is an action (one is liable only for such matters)? Hugging and kissing are not actions!

"Lo Sa'asun" is a Klal. "Zove'ach la'Elohim Yacharam" is a Prat. "Bilti la'Shem Levado" is another Klal. Everything [similar to the Prat] is included in the Klal. This includes hugging and kissing!

(R. Yosi): The verse [about the Egel] comes only to mention the disgrace of Yisrael. "Va'Yishtachavu Lo", and not to Hash-m. "Va'Yizbechu Lo", and not to Hash-m. "Va'Yomru Lo [these are your gods]", and not to Hash-m.

Question: What is the source [that one who accepts an idol to be his god is Chayav Misah]?

Answer: It says here (calling the Egel their god) Amirah, and it says Amirah regarding an enticer [to serve idolatry]. Just like Amirah regarding an enticer, the Torah made speech like an action, also Amirah said here, speech is like an action.

(R. Zeirah): It is written "va'Yelech va'Ya'avod Elohim Acherim va'Yishtachu Lahem vela'Shemesh Oh la'Yare'ach." It does not say la'Shemesh, rather, vela'Shemesh. This is not a Klal u'Ferat [to exclude other idolatries], rather, inclusions [of all Avodos].

Question (R. Aba bar Zimna, to R. Zeirah): It is written "Es Zeh Tochelu mi'Kol Asher ba'Mayim Kol Asher Lo Senapir v'Kaskeses ba'Mayim ba'Yamim uva'Nechalim" - if so (like you said), this is not a Klal u'Ferat u'Chlal, rather, a Ribuy, because a Vov is written (uva'Nechalim)!

Answer #1 (R. Yochanan ben Maryei): Any [Sefer Torah in which] I find a Vov [in uva'Nechalim], I will erase it.

Answer #2 (R. Shmuel bar Avodama): (Really, the word has a Vov.) I would have said what (has no fins and scales) is in seas is forbidden, and what is in barrels and ponds is permitted! "V'Chol Asher ba'Mayim" includes [forbids what is in these]. (We explained the question and answer according to KORBAN HA'EDAH.)