(Mishnah): If some of the group slept (whilst eating the Korban Pesach) they may continue to eat; if all of the group slept, they may not eat.

R. Yosi: If they dozed they may eat; if they fell into a deep sleep they may not eat.

After midnight, the flesh of the Korban Pesach is Metameh a person's hands.

Pigul and Nosar are Metameh a person's hands.

R. Yishmael: If one recited the blessing on the Korban Pesach, it exempts reciting a blessing on the Zevach (Korban Chagigah); but if he recited the blessing on the Zevach, it does not exempt reciting a blessing on the Pesach.

R. Akiva: Neither blessing exempts reciting a blessing on the other one.

Question: Why is the flesh of the Pesach after midnight Metameh a person's hands? Is it because he took his mind off of eating it or is it because it has become Nosar after midnight?

Answer: When the Mishnah taught about part of the group falling asleep, that if part of the group remained awake, they may all eat. It must be, therefore, that midnight had not passed and if some remained awake it is permitted since they had not taken their mind off of the Korban. (Note: This follows the original Vilna text rather than the text of the Korban HaEidah.)

R. Simon quoting R''YBL: Pigul and Nosar join together to be Metameh a person's hands and to make a person liable for eating a Kzayis.

Query: If this mixture touched Terumah, does it disqualify the Terumah?

It is a Kal Vechomer - if they make a person's hands Tameh which can then disqualify Terumah, certainly they themselves can disqualify Terumah.

Question: Is sacrificial meat that was taken outside Metameh the hands or not? If you say that it is Metameh, Pigul and Nosar will not disqualify Terumah; if you say that Pigul and Nosar disqualify Terumah, this meat that was taken outside is not the same, as if part of it was taken outside and became Tameh, it would also be Metameh the part that remained inside.

R. Avin: Really Pigul and Nosar disqualify Terumah and meat taken outside is Metameh; but we do not say that the outside part is Metameh the inside part since it is a Tumas Beis Hasetarim (internal Tumah) and it is not Metameh. (However, according to R. Meir, even Tumas Beis Hasetarim is Metameh, so our Mishnah cannot be R. Meir.)

Question: Did R. Yochanan not say that all items that became Tameh and were split apart, if the majority was separated, it is no longer considered connected; here also, once he cuts the majority it is all considered cut and is not considered Tumah Beis Hasetarim?

Answer (R. Chananya): The case is when he cut it off bit by bit and discarded it.

(Note: The Korban HaEidah removes these words from the text.)