(Rav): [The first Tana of our Mishnah means says that if one accepted Nezirus in a cemetery, and] he left, he counts Nezirus in Taharah. If he entered [the cemetery again], he brings Korban Tum'ah, [even if it is] on the same day [that he left];

[The Tana] R. Eliezer says, he does not [bring Korban Tum'ah if he returned] on that day.

Question (Kahana, to Rav): Does he not need Haza'ah on days three and seven (before counting Nezirus Taharah)?

Answer (Rav): The Torah called one who separated from a grave Tahor [even before Haza'ah] - "Acharei Taharaso Shiv'as Yamim Yisperu Lo."

(Shmuel): If he left, received Haza'as [on day three] and repeated [on day seven], immersed and entered the same day, he brings Korban Tum'ah the same day. R. Eliezer says, not on that day.

(Ula bar Yishmael): When does [R. Eliezer] argue? It is regarding a Nazir Tamei. Regarding a Nazir Tahor, even R. Eliezer agrees [that he brings Korban Tum'ah] even if there is no place for days to fall (he is not even on his second day).

Question (Shmuel bar Aba): Can one day of his Nezirus and one day of Nezirus Beno join [to two days, to bring Korban Tum'ah even according to R. Eliezer]?

Note: There is an implied question - what is the case that he asked about?

If his son was born today, and he entered [Ohel ha'Mes] tomorrow, there are two days to Nezirus Beno (they need not join)!

If his son was born tomorrow, there are two days to his Nezirus (they need not join)!

Answer #1 (R. Mana): The case is, [he was born] Bein ha'Shemashos (and the father became Tamei the next day).

Note: Perhaps we are concerned that he was born at the exact moment between day and night. Alternatively, even if we are not concerned for this, if they do not join, he cannot bring Korban Tum'ah, for it is a Safek which Nezirus had two days. (PF)

Answer #2 (R. Avin): You can even say [that he was born] at midday (and he became Tamei later that day). Do we not hold that the beginning of the day counts for him, and the end of the day counts for [Nezirus] Beno?! (If they join, it is considered that there were two days.)

(R. Yosi): About what [does Shmuel bar Aba] ask? It is regarding a Nazir Tahor. Regarding a Nazir Tamei, it is clear to him that they join. (This is unlike Ula bar Yishmael, who said that R. Eliezer argues about a Nazir Tamei, but no one requires two days for a Nazir Tahor who became Tamei.)

Question (R. Mana, to R. Yosi): Does a Kal v'Chomer not teach this? [Tamei] days that do not count for his Nezirus, and not for Nezirus Beno, you say that they join. [Tahor] days that count for his Nezirus, and not for Nezirus Beno, all the more so they should join!

Answer (R. Yosi): (This is not a Kal v'Chomer.) There, he is not proper to receive warning (for he is already Tamei, therefore nothing separates his Nezirus from Nezirus Beno). Here (when he is Tahor), he is proper to receive warning (for the Nezirus he observes, so they are separate; perhaps they do not join.)

Question (R. Bun bar Chiyah): Just like you say there according to R. Eliezer at the beginning, there must be [days] to fall, (if he became Tamei) at the end, [does he hold] even if there are no [remaining days] to fall?

Answer (R. Ze'ira, in front of R. Mana): Do we not learn this from our Mishnah? If he became Tamei on day 100, he canceled everything. R. Eliezer says, he canceled only 30. (We explained this like SEFER NIR.)

Rebuttal (R. Mana): We learn [from there] that he cancels. Do we learn [from there] that he brings Korban Tum'ah?!