1)

USING PE'AH FOR SHABBOS AND SUKAH (Yerushalmi Kilayim Perek 4 Halachah 2 Daf 21a)

à"ø áà áø îîì èéèøôìéåú ùáëøîéí àñåø ìèìèì úçúéäï îôðé ùäï ñåó ú÷øä [ãó ìè òîåã á (òåæ åäãø)] åàéï ñåó ú÷øä îöéì îùåí ôéàä.

(a)

(R. Ba bar Mamal): One may not carry underneath town Tutrapliyos (beams that protrude from large buildings that stand upon the four large columns at the entrance to the building) as they are the end of the roofing, which cannot be effective as Pe'ah.

àîø øáé ôéðçñ àúà òåáãà ÷åîé øáé éøîéä áàøáòä òîåãéï åòìéäï àøáòä ôéèñìéåú åäúéø ìèìèì úçúéäï îùåí ôéàä.

(b)

(R. Pinchas): A story came before R. Yirmiyah, where four beams were resting on four columns, and R. Pinchas permitted them to carry underneath them because of Pe'ah. (Note: This entry follows the understanding of Rav Chaim Kanievski.)

øáé áåï åøáðéï áòåï ÷åîé øáé æòéøà ôéàä îäå ùúöéì áñåëä.

(c)

Question #1 (R. Bun and Rabbanan to R. Zeira): Can Pe'ah serve as a wall of a Sukah?

àîø ìåï ôéàä îöìú áñåëä.

(d)

Answer (R. Zeira): Yes.

ñåó ñëê îäå ùéöéì áñåëä.

(e)

Question #2: Can the end of the Schach (that is resting on four vertical beams) serve as a wall for the Sukah (in the way of the reed cord stretched between canes)?

àîø ìåï àéï ñåó ñëê îöéì áñåëä.

(f)

Answer: No.

îä áéï æä ìæä.

(g)

Question: What's the difference?

æä ðòùä ìëê åæä àéðå ðòùä ìëê.

(h)

Answer: One is built for this purpose (Pe'ah), one is not (Schach).

à"ø àáäå ëì àéìéï îéìéà ìòðéï îùà åîúï äà ìäåøåú àñåø ìäåøåú. îä àí ñåëä ÷ìä àú àîø àñåø. ùáú äçîåøä ìà ëì ùëï.

(i)

(R. Abahu): All of these discussions are theoretical, but a Rav may not instruct a person to rely on Pe'ah as a partition on Shabbos. If for Sukah, which is relatively lenient (it is a positive Mitzvah) we do not rely on it; for Shabbos which is stringent (transgressing it is punishable with Kares), we certainly do not rely on it.

øáé áåï áø çééà áòà ÷åîé ø' æòéøà îàï úðà ôéàä îöìú ìà ø' éåçðï áï ðåøé.

(j)

Question (R. Bun bar Chiya to R. Zeira): Who is the Tana that holds that Pe'ah acts as a partition for Kilayim? Is it not R. Yochanan ben Nuri (who said earlier that Pe'ah also helps for a partition on Shabbos - so why conclude that it does not help for Shabbos)?!

àîø ìéä àãäé úðà.

(k)

Answer (R. Zeira): Yes, but R. Yochanan ben Nuri's view is a minority opinion and is not the Halacha.

ðîöàú àîø ìòðéï ëìàéí ëì äôçåú îùìù' ëñúåí.

(l)

The rule is - for the laws of Kilayim, a breach of less than three is considered to be closed up;

îâ' åòã àøáòä àí äòåîã øáä òì äôøåõ îåúø åàí äôøåõ øáä òì äòåîã àñåø.

1.

Between three and four (not inclusive), if the solid is the majority it is permitted to plant; if the breach is the majority, it is prohibited;

îàøáò åòã òùø àí òåîã îøåáä òì äôøåõ îåúø åàí ôøåõ îøåáä òì äòåîã ëðâã äòåîã îåúø ëðâã äôøåõ àñåø.

2.

Between four and ten (inclusive), if the solid is the majority it is permitted to plant; if the breach is the majority, opposite the solid is permitted; opposite the breach is prohibited.

éåúø îòùø àò"ô ùäòåîã øáä òì äôøåõ ëðâã äòåîã îåúø ëðâã äôøåõ àñåø.

3.

If it is more than ten, even if the solid is the majority, opposite the solid it is permitted to plant, opposite the breach is prohibited.

ìòðéï ùáú ëì äôçåú îùìùä ëñúåí.

(m)

For the laws of Shabbos, a breach of less than three is considered to be closed up.

îùìùä åòã àøáòä îàøáòä åòã òùø àí äòåîã øáä òì äôøåõ îåúø åàí äôøåõ øáä òì äòåîã àñåø.

1.

Between three and four and between four and ten, if the majority is solid, it is permitted (for it to serve as a partition); if the breach is the majority, it is prohibited.

éúø îòùø àò"ô ùòåîã øáä òì äôøåõ àñåø.

2.

More than ten, even if there is a majority of solid, it is prohibited.

ø' çððéä ø' éåãä áø ôæé áùí ø' éåçðï [ãó ëà òîåã á] ìéú ëàï îâ' åòã àøáòä. [ãó î òîåã à (òåæ åäãø)] éù ëàï ôéøöä â' àéï ëàï î÷åí ã'.

(n)

(R. Chananya/ R. Yehuda bar Pazi quoting R. Yochanan): Remove the case of between three and four because once there is a breach of three, we cannot view it as closed up (Lavud).

îúéá øáé îðà åäúðéðï î÷éôéï á÷ðéí å÷ðä éù ìå î÷åí.

(o)

Question (R. Mana): The Mishnah (in Maseches Eiruvin) teaches that one may make an enclosure using vertical canes. Are canes usually a Tefach wide?

à"ì ìà úúéáéðé ôçåú îùìùä ùëì äôçåú îùìùä ëñúåí äåà.

(p)

Response (R. Chananya): You cannot question me from the case of canes, as the Mishnah is discussing a case when the canes are positioned close together (less than three apart) allowing us to use Lavud to view them as one unit.

øáé éåñé áé ø' áåï áùí øá îëì î÷åí îëéåï ùäòåîã øáä òì äôøåõ îåúø:

(q)

(R. Yosi bei R. Bun quoting Rav): Nevertheless, whether the breaches are less than three or between three and four, since the solid is the majority, it is permitted.