(Mishnah): If a woman shows a Get without a Kesuvah, she collects a Kesuvah.

If she shows a Kesuvah without a Get and says that she lost her Get, and he says that (Beis Din tore her Get when he paid her Kesuvah, and) he lost his receipt, and similarly if a creditor shows a loan document (from before Shemitah) without a Pruzbul (a document showing that the loan was given over to Beis Din before Shemitah, which permits collecting it after Shemitah), they do not collect.

R. Shimon ben Gamliel says, from the time of danger (decrees against keeping Mitzvos) and onwards (we destroy a Get after it is given and a Pruzbul after it is written), a woman collects her Kesuvah without a Get, and a creditor collects his debt without a Pruzbul.

(Gemara - R. Chiyah citing R. Yochanan): One who claims against an act of Beis Din (he says that he paid without witnesses), he is not believed.

Question (R. Chiya bar Aba): Does not our Mishnah teach this? If a woman shows a Get without a Kesuvah, she collects a Kesuvah.

Answer (R. Yochanan): Babylonian! After I revealed for you the earthenware from [covering] the pearl (I taught you why she collects a Kesuvah), you tell me, does not our Mishnah teach this?!

(Rav): [Our Mishnah] discusses a place where they do not write a Kesuvah document, but in a place where they write a Kesuvah document, what she shows, she collects.

Retraction (Rav): Even in a place where they write a Kesuvah document, she collects [even without a Kesuvah]. One who has great strength [Chachmah] to challenge this, let him challenge!

Question (R. Yosi): It was taught that she collects [her Kesuvah] through her Get [alone. If it is in a place where they write a Kesuvah,] she can hide her Kesuvah, and go back and collect again [after her husband dies]!

Answer: Is there no Beis Din there?! (He can pay her in front of Beis Din, and he will have proof that he paid!)

Question: If [she is in a place where there is no Beis Din, like] Maton [the concern returns]!

Answer: Are there no witnesses there?! (He can pay her in front of witnesses.)

Question: If the witnesses went overseas [the concern returns]!

Answer: Is there no receipt?!

Question: Rav holds that we do not write a receipt!

Answer: Rav does not hold that we write a receipt, like the case of one who says 'I lost my document; write another for me' [and I will write for you a receipt that you did so. We do not, for he should have been careful with his document. Here,] he holds [that we write a receipt], like it was said, if the Kesuvah was lost, they make another Kesuvah (for one may not be with his wife without a Kesuvah. We explained this like GILYON EFRAYIM and R. MEIR SIMCHAH.)

Question (R. Ba): It was taught that she collects [her Kesuvah] through her Get [alone. If it is in a place where they write a Kesuvah,] she can hide her Kesuvah, wait until he dies, and go back and collect again!

Answer (R. Yosi bei R. Bun): Does she not need to bring a proof that she served (was married to) him until he died?!

(R. Ze'ira citing R. Avunah citing Rav): In a place where they write a Kesuvah document, if he says 'I wrote', and she says 'you did not write', she needs to bring a proof that he did not write;

In a place where they do not write a Kesuvah document, if he says 'I wrote', and she says 'you did not write', he needs to bring a proof that he wrote;

R. Chiya bar Aba found a Pruzbul of R. Yonason; there were tears in it. [R. Yonason] said to him, I do not need it.

Support #1 (Beraisa): A borrower is believed to say 'this document, I paid it and tore it' (and the lender found the torn pieces).

Support #2 (R. Yirmeyah citing R. Chiyah - Mishnah): From the time of danger and onwards, a woman collects her Kesuvah without a Get, and a creditor collects his debt without a Pruzbul.

Is it possible [that she collects even if she never received a Get]?! No, [rather, she says] 'I received it, and I tore it.' And here, he says 'I wrote [a Pruzbul], and I tore it.' (We explained this like SHA'AREI TORAS ERETZ YISRAEL.)

Note: Perhaps the one who brought the proof from the Beraisa did not hold that the Halachah always follows R. Shimon ben Gamliel in Mishnayos (with only three exceptions), or he was unsure if his law applies even after the danger passed.

(Mishnah): If a woman has two Gitin and two Kesuvos, she collects two Kesuvos. (The date of the first Get is in between the dates on the Kesuvos.)

If she has two Kesuvos and one Get (dated after both of them), or one Kesuvah and two Gitin, or one Kesuvah and one Get and witnesses to her husband's death, she collects only one Kesuvah. This is because one who remarries his ex-wife does so on condition that she will receive only her original Kesuvah.

If a minor's father married him off [and they remained together when he matured], her Kesuvah is valid, for on this condition he kept her.

If a Nochri converted and his wife [converted] with him, her Kesuvah is valid, for on this condition he kept her.

(Gemara): (Our Mishnah says that if she has two Gitin and two Kesuvos, she collects two Kesuvos.) This is when the [date of the first] Get is in between [the dates on] one Kesuvah and the other Kesuvah.

Question: This is if the Kesuvos were equal. If one was 100 and one was 200 [what is the law]?

Answer: Rav Huna, Rav Yirmeyah and Rav Chisda [argued about this]. One said that she collects the first [Kesuvah], another said that she collects the second, and the other said that she collects 100 from the date of the first [Kesuvah] and the addition from the date of the second.

Inference (R. Chananyah, to R. Mana): Does [our Mishnah] not teach that one who borrows from his friend, and returned and borrowed from him, he must say [write in the second document] 'aside from the first document that I have against you'?

Rebuttal (R. Mana): It is normal for a woman to say 'the Kesuvah was lost; make (write) another [Kesuvah, for one may not be with his wife without a Kesuvah]. Is it normal for a person to say 'I lost my document; write another for me'?! (Surely it is not. If the borrower is proper, he will admit verbally, but not write another document.)

Remark: Even so, it is possible that [R. Mana] agrees [to R. Chananyah that it is proper to write so, lest a Beis Din err and think that both documents are for the same loan. We explained this like the RITVA.]

Question (R. Yudan bar Shikli, to R. Yosi): (Our Mishnah says that if she has two Gitin and one Kesuvah, she collects one Kesuvah.) Didn't R. Avahu say in the name of R. Yochanan that a document that one borrowed with and paid it, he may not borrow [another loan] with it [even] on the same day?! (Even though it is not predated, the lien that the document creates was pardoned; it cannot create another lien. She should not collect at all!)

Note: Surely, the date of the Kesuvah precedes both Gitin. If not, obviously it was written for the latter marriage! Surely he is not believed to say that he paid her first Kesuvah, and did not tear the Get or Kesuvah, and has no receipt or witnesses of payment. Rather, he agrees that he remarried her, on condition that the first Kesuvah document is her Kesuvah. Even if we learn from R. Yochanan that the document is invalid, this is like admission that he did not write a valid Kesuvah for the second marriage, and he is obligated even in a place where they write a Kesuvah! Perhaps R. Yudan asks why the Mishnah says Stam that she collects, which implies that she collects like a regular Kesuvah, even from buyers. Since she does not have a valid document, she cannot take from buyers!

Answer (R. Yosi): Here [R. Yochanan] discusses when he paid [the debt]. Here [our Mishnah] discusses when he did not pay.