1)

(a)Besides the Shemen ha'Mishchah and the flask containing the Manna - Aharon's stick (with its almonds and blossoms) as well as the box containing the golden mice, which the P'lishtim sent Yisrael as a gift) were hidden together with the Aron.

(b)Yoshiyah Hamelech ordered the Levi'im to hide them.

(c)It was when Yoshiyahu read the Pasuk in Ki Savo "Yolech Hash-m Oscha ve'es Malk'cha ... ", foretelling the Galus - that he ordered them to be hidden ...

(d)... because he realized that once they carried them into Galus, they would not return them in the near future (see also Tosfos ha'Rosh).

(e)We learn this from the words in Divrei ha'Yamim "Ein lachem Masa be'Kasef"- which imply that they should hide the Aron in order not to take it with them into Galus (since the Aron had to be carried on the shoulders).

2)

(a)Rebbi Elazar learns from the 'Gezeirah-Shavah' ...

1. ... "Sham" ("ve'No'adti l'cha Sham Vedibarti Itcha me'al ha'Kapores" and "Ve'no'adti Shamah li'Venei Yisrael" [in connection with the Aron) "Shamah" ("Ve'sein Shamah M'lo ha'Omer Man" that - just as Yoshiyahu hid the Aron, so too, did he hide the flask containing the Manna.

2. ... "le'Doroseichem" ("Vehanach oso Lifnei Hash-m le'Mishmeres le'Doroseichem" [in connection with Aharons stick]) "le'Doroseichem" ("Shemen Mishchas Kodesh Yih'yeh Zeh Li le'Doroseichem") that - just as he hid the flask containing the Manna, so too, did he hide Aharon's stick.

3. ... "le'Mishmeres" (le'Doroseichem)" "le'Mishmeres (le'Os li'Venei Meri" [in connection with Aharon's staff]) - that just as he hid Aharon's staff, so too, did he hide the Shemen ha'Mishchah.

(b)The problem with the earlier statement that Yeho'achaz was anointed with the Shemen ha'Mishchah is now that - by that time, the anointing oil had already been hidden (by Yoshayahu, Yeho'achaz' father), so how could they have used it to anoint Yeho'achaz?

(c)Rav Papa solves this problem - by establishing the oil that they used to anoint Ye'ho'achaz as Afarsemon oil (as we explained earlier in connection with Yeihu).

(d)The Beraisa describes the method by which kings and Kohanim Gedolim were anointed. The former were anointed in the shape of a crown - the latter, like a Greek 'Chi' (like an x, as Rebbi Menashya bar Gada explains).

3)

(a)Everyone agrees that they would pour oil on the incumbent's head and place oil [which is equivalent to anointing] between his eye-lashes). One Tana learns from the Pasuk "Vayitzok mi'Shemen ha'Mishchah al Rosh Aharon, Vayimshach oso Lekadsho" that - they poured first and placed afterwards.

(b)The Tana who gives precedence to the anointing, and who learns it from the Holy vessels, which they anointed (without pouring at all), explain the above Pasuk to mean that - they poured the oil on the head of Aharon in order to anoint him (whereas the pouring itself was of no significance).

(c)The Beraisa explains the Pasuk in Tehilim "ka'Shemen ha'Tov al ha'Rosh ha'Yored al ha'Zakan, Z'kan Aharon" - with reference to two drops of oil that were suspended permanently on the tip of Aharon's beard.

(d)According to Rav Papa, whenever Aharon talked (or shaved [as the Kohen Gadol was obligated to do every day]) - they would move up to the roots.

(e)The significance of the Pasuk written in the same Kapitel ...

1. ... "ke'Tal Chermon" is that - just as there is no Me'ilah with regard to the dew on Mount Chermon, so too, did Moshe not need to worry that perhaps he was guilty of Me'ilah (by touching the drops of oil [and benefiting from them] when he dressed Aharon, during the seven days of Milu'im).

2. ... "Hinei Mah Tov u'Mah Na'im Sheves Achim Gam Yachad" is that - Aharon did not need to worry either (that perhaps some of the oil had fallen onto other parts of his body), because just as Moshe did not commit Me'ilah, neither did he.

4)

(a)A king is anointed by a fountain is - because it is a Siman Tov, a hint that just as a fountain flows constantly, so too, will his rule last a long time.

(b)Shlomoh Hamelech was anointed by the fountain of Gichon (following the instructions of his father David).

(c)The advice Rebbi Ami gives to someone who wants to know whether he will ...

1. ... live until the end of the coming year is - to kindle a light during the Aseres Yemei Teshuvah, in a room where there is no draft, and see whether it burns until the end (a sign that he will survive) or whether it goes out before its time.

2... succeed in the business venture that he is about to undertake is - to rear chickens first and see how well they breed (if he has a good batch, it is a sure sign that he will succeed).

3. ... return from the overseas trip that he about to embark upon is - to stand in a dark house and see whether a double shadow is visible (in which case he will return), or not.

(d)It is preferable not to make this last test - because it is possible that he is destined to return even if a double shadow is not visible. Meanwhile, the fear that he will generate upon not seeing it, will justify itself and cause his demise.

5)

(a)Abaye learns from all this is - the principle 'Simna Milsa Hi' (Simanim [whether they are good or bad] are effective).

(b)He therefore advises eating on Rosh Hashanah pumpkin, fenugreek, leek - beets and dates.

(c)Rav Masharshaya advised his sons ...

1. ... before attending the Shi'ur with their Rebbe - to prepare the Beraisos relevant to the Shi'ur.

2. ... whilst the Shi'ur was in progress - to look at the Rebbe's face (to conform to the Pasuk in Yeshayah "Ve'hayu Einecha Ro'os es Morecha").

3. ... when they studied on their own - to study beside a river (so that they should learn without a break, just like a river flows without a break, similar to what we learned above, regarding the crowning of a king).

(d)He also taught them that ...

1. ... it was better to sit by the trash-heaps of Masa Mechsaya (where the people were Talmidei-Chachamim and well-mannered) than by the palaces of Pumbedisa (where they were not).

2. ... it is preferable to eat small, smelly fish than good strong Kutach (a sharp condiment made of moldy bread, milk and salt) that can break stones ...

(e)... because either the latter cause Timtum ha'Leiv (a stopped-up heart [meaning a weak ability to learn]), or because it is that much more expensive.

6)

(a)The words "Ramah Karni b'Elokai" that Chanah said in her Tefilah imply - "Ramah Karni", ve'Lo Ranch Pachi' ...

(b)... meaning that - the kingdom of David and Shlomoh, who were anointed with a horn (which is unbreakable) endured, whereas Shaul and Yeihu, who were anointed with an earthenware jar (which breaks easily), did not.

(c)Chanah said this - because it was her son Shmuel who anointed David with the Pach Shemen.

7)

(a)In the Pasuk "Im ha'Kohen ha'Mashi'ach Yecheta" (in connection with the Par He'elam Davar), the Torah needs to add ...

1. ... "Kohen", because had it only written "Mashi'ach", we would have thought that - it is referring to a king (and not a Kohen Gadol).

2. ... "Mashi'ach", because had it only written "Kohen", we would have thought that it is referring to a Kohen Merubeh Begadim.

(b)And had the Torah written only "Kohen Mashi'ach", we would have thought that it is referring to a Kohen Mashu'ach Milchamah, so it writes "ha'Kohen ha'Mashi'ach" - to teach us that it is in fact, referring to a Kohen Gadol Mashu'ach.

(c)We base this Limud on Rava, who says "ha'Yerech", 'ha'Meyumenes she'be'Yerech', meaning that - the extra 'Hey' indicates that the Torah is talking about the right thigh (since the right is considered more important than the left). Here too, we learn from the extra 'Hey' that the Torah is talking about the most important 'Mashu'ach'.

(d)The Tana suggested that "Mashi'ach" means a king, despite the fact that a king brings a Sa'ir, and not a Par - because he thought that perhaps that is confined to a case of Shig'gas Ma'aseh, but in a case of He'elam Davar, he will bring a Par.

8)

(a)We establish the Reisha of our Mishnah, which distinguishes between a Kohen Mashu'ach and a Merubeh Begadim with regard to a Par He'elam Davar, not like Rebbi Meir - who maintains in a Beraisa that a Kohen Gadol Merubeh Begadim too brings a Par He'elam Davar ...

(b)... which he learns - from the word "ha'Kohen" (in the Pasuk in Vayikra "Ve'heivi ha'Kohen ha'Mashi'ach"), since it is otherwise superfluous (see Tosfos ha'Rosh).

(c)We query this however, from the Seifa ('Ein bein Kohen Meshamesh le'Kohen she'Avar ... '), based on another statement of Rebbo Meir, who rules in a Beraisa that, when the Kohen ha'Meshamesh becomes Tahor, the Kohen she'Avar continues to perform the Avodah, not in the capacity of ...

1. ... a Kohen Gadol, because that will create a rift between him and the Kohen ha'Meshamesh, and not in the capacity of ...

2. ... a Kohen Hedyot, due to the principle Ma'alin ba'Kodesh ve'Lo Moridin (one can only rise in Kedushah, but not be relegated).

(d)And Rebbi Yossi proves his point, by citing an incident - where Yosef ben Eikim from Tzipori (a Kohen Gadol) became Tamei and was replaced, and when he returned to his post, the Chachamim did not allow the Kohen she'Avar to serve in either capacity (as we just explained).

(e)In any event, the author of the Seifa appears to be Rebbi Meir. To reconcile this with the fact that we just established the Reisha like the Rabbanan - we conclude 'Reisha, Rabbanan; Seifa, Rebbi Meir!'

9)

(a)We just established the Reisha of our Mishnah like the Rabbanan, and the Seifa like Rebbi Meir - which, Rav Chisda comments - is perfectly acceptable.

(b)When Rav Yosef establishes the entire Mishnah like Rebbi, he means that - Rebbi stated the Reisha as a S'tam Mishnah like the Rabbanan, because he holds like them (in that a Merubeh Begadim does not bring a Par ha'Ba al Kol ha'Mitzvos); and the Seifa, as a S'tam Mishnah like Rebbi Meir, because he holds like him (in that a Kohen she'Avar continues to serve as a Kohen Gadol).

(c)Rava establishes the entire Mishnah like Rebbi Shimon - on the basis of a Beraisa (that we will now proceed to discuss).

10)

(a)Besides the eight Halachos of a Kohen Gadol discussed in our Mishnah, the Beraisa another six that pertain to him exclusively (and not to a Kohen Hedyot). In spite of the fact that he is permitted to sacrifice Korbanos even when he is an Onan - he neither receives a portion nor may he even eat Kodshim.

(b)A Kohen Gadol has the right to sacrifice any Korban - and to take any portion (even from a Korban that he did not sacrifice) that he pleases.

(c)He wears the eight garments of the Kohen Gadol, only he may perform the Avodah on Yom Kipur - and he is Patur from bringing a Korban for Tum'as Mikdash ve'Kodashav (even though be'Meizid it carries a Chiyuv Kareis).

11)

(a)The Beraisa precludes ...

1. ... a Merubeh Begadim from - the Par ha'Ba al Kol ha'Mitzvos (like the Rabbanan of Rebbi Meir).

2. ... a Kohen she'Avar from - the bull of Yom Kipur and the Asiris ha'Eifah (the Minchas Chavitin [like Rebbi Meir]).

(b)And he adds that - only 'Lo Porei'a ve'Lo Poreim (not to allow his hair to grow long and not to rent his garments in mourning), Ein Metamei li'Kerovim, Muzhar al ha'Besulah, Asur be'Almanah, and Machzir es ha'Rotzei'ach' out of the entire list apply to the Kohen Mashu'ach Milachmah ...

(c)... because they are all mentioned specifically in the Parshah (as we will see shortly).

(d)The last Halachah ('Machzir es ha'Rotzei'ach') is the opinion of Rebbi Yehudah. According to the Chachamim - 'Eino Machzir'.

(e)Rava establishes this Beraisa like Rebbi Shimon (like he did our Mishnah). Rav Papa proves this - from the Beraisa's ruling 'Patur al Tum'as Mikdash ve'Kodashav, which is the opinion of Rebbi Shimon, as we learned above.

12)

(a)The Pasuk in Emor, which forbids a Kohen Gadol to let his hair grow long, rent his clothes and render himself Tamei for a deceased relative begins "ve'ha'Kohen ha'Gadol me'Echav asher Yutzak al Rosho Shemen ha'Mishchah, u'Milei es Yado Li'lebosh es ha'Begadim". "ha'Kohen ha'Gadol ... " refers to a Kohen Mashu'ach ...

1. ... "asher Yutzak al Rosho" - to a Mashu'ach Milchamah, and ...

2. ... "u'Milei es Yado Lil'bosh es ha'Begadim" - to a Merubeh Begadim.

(b)And the Tana learns from the word ...

1. ... "Alav" (in the Pasuk in Emor "ki Neizer Shemen Mishchas Elokav Alav" - "Alav", 've'Lo al Chaveiro', to preclude a Merubeh Begadim from the Halachah permitting a Kohen Gadol to serve even when he is an Onan.

2. ... "ve'Hu (in the Pasuk [Ibid.] in connection with a Kohen Gadol "ve'Hu Ishah bi'Vesulehah Yikach" that - on the other hand, he is included in the obligation to marry a Besulah.

(c)This is the opinion of Rebbi Yishmael. According to Rebbi Akiva, "ve'Hu" comes to include - even a Kohen Gadol who had to stand down because of a permanent blemish (in addition to one who had to stand down because of Tum'ah, which is only temporary).

13)

(a)Rava asked Rav Nachman whether a Kohen Gadol who contacts Tzara'as is permitted to marry an Almanah or not - whether he is precluded completely from marrying an Almanah ('Midcha Dachi'), or merely Patur as long as long as he is eligible to serve ('Miftar Patur').

(b)Rav Nachman was unable to resolve the She'eilah. His son Rav Huna however, resolved it - from Rebbi Akiva in the previous Beraisa, who included a Kohen with a permanent blemish in the obligation to marry a Besulah (and a Kohen Gadol with Tzara'as is no different).

(c)When Rav Papa heard this from Rav Huna b'rei de'Rav Nachman - he was so thrilled that he kissed him on his head and gave him his daughter's hand in marriage.

14)

(a)We already learned earlier that when a close relative dies, a Kohen Gadol performs neither P'ri'ah nor P'rimah, and that he sacrifices Korbanos as usual. Our Mishnah qualifies the Din of 'Eino Porem' however - by requiring the Kohen Gadol to perform P'rimah, too, only whereas a Kohen Hedyot tears at the top of the garment (Lem'alah), he tears at the bottom (Lematah).

(b)Rav and Shmuel both take Lema'alah literally. Rav takes Lematah too, literally. According to Shmuel however - it means below the top rim (leaving the rim itself intact).

(c)The Beraisa - requires a total tear for parents, but makes do with a partial tear (without separating the rim at the top [like Shmuel[) for other relatives.

(d)That presents Shmuel with a problem - because if such a partial tear is sometimes considered a tear, how can he permit a Kohen Gadol to do it?

15)

(a)To solve the problem, we establish Shmuel like Rebbi Yehudah, who rules that - any tear that does not totally divide the two sections of the garment is ineffective.

(b)In another Beraisa, Rebbi Yehudah discusses the Pasuk in Emor "es Rosho Lo Yifra, u'Vegadav Lo Yifrom". When he says that if the Pasuk had said Rosh and Beged, he would have interpreted it to mean that of a Sotah, he means that - the Kohen Gadol would have been precluded from uncovering the hair and tearing the clothes of a Sotah.

(c)But now that it says "Rosho" and "Begadav" he concludes - it means that a Kohen Gadol may not let his own hair grow long or tear his own clothes (at all [even as a sign of mourning]).

(d)Rebbi Yishmael holds that - a Kohen Gadol tears his garment at the bottom (like our Mishnah).

(e)We reconcile Shmuel with Rebbi Yehudah - (in spite of the fact that he [Shmuel] holds that a Kohen Gadol is obligated to perform Keri'ah) - inasmuch as he may well not hold like Rebbi Yehudah regarding this Halachah, he does however, hold like him with regard to the location of a Keri'ah.

16)

(a)Our Mishnah rules that ...

1. ... whatever is more common or more holy than 'its friend' - takes precedence over it.

2. ... in a case where a Par Mashi'ach and a Par ha'Eidah are both waiting to be sacrificed - then the former takes precedence.

(b)Abaye and Tana de'bei Rebbi Yishmael respectively, learn from the Pasuk ...

1. ... in Pinchas "Mil'vad Olas ha'Boker asher le'Olas ha'Tamid" - that whatever is more common takes precedence.

2. ... in Emor "Ve'kidashto" - that whatever is more holy takes precedence.

(c)Besides with regard being called up to the Torah one must give a Kohen precedence - with regard to Bensching and helping himself first during a meal.