More Discussions for this daf
1. If the Torah would only write Gadish ...... 2. King David's Questions 3. Responsibility of Guardianship in Piku'ach Nefesh
4. Ru'ach Metzuyah 5. If the Torah would only write Gadish ...... 6. Grama b'Nezikin
7. King David's question 8. Torah's Chidush of Gadish being Chayav with Esh 9. Torah's explicit mention of all items by Esh
10. Giving fire to a Katan 11. Mah she'Nehenis 12. Causation is exempt with respect to damages
13. השולח את הבערה ואכלה עצים או אבנים או עפר ברש"י 14. הערות ברש"י לגבי סכסכה אבניו 15. הערה ברש"י לגבי סכסכה אבניו
DAF DISCUSSIONS - BAVA KAMA 60

Aschi asked:

the gemara states that one might think one is poter for burning his friend's gadish because it is rare for one to be negligent with fire next to it. i understood that therefore one might think the torah applied a potur always; even if one was negligent.Rashi says "deica lmaiemar onus hu" , what does Rashi mean? if he means that i may draw an incorrect conclusion as to what occurred, are we not relying on eidim to verify exactly what happened? please explain thank you

Aschi, Toronto Ontario

The Kollel replies:

Perhaps Rashi means that if it would only have said Kotzim I would have thought that the Torah gives the example of Kotzim because the Torah only meant to obligate a person who was Poshe'ah similar to the case of Kotzim. Rashi means that we could say that the case the Torah refers to is a case of Peshi'ah.

Dov Freedman