More Discussions for this daf
1. Yi'ush of coins 2. Finding a coin 3. Is a Siman always necessary?
4. Gemara tries to bring proofs to Rava 5. Ye'ush she'Lo mi'Da'as 6. Lost Objects
7. A Lost Object Without A Siman 8. Yiush she'Lo mi'Da'as 9. Kikaros Shel Ba'al ha'Bayis
10. Scattered fruits belong to the finder 11. Ye'ush She'Lo mi'Da'as 12. Two types of Ganav
13. Two proofs for Rava 14. RASHI ON THE MISHNAH 15. Scattered Fruit and Coins
16. Duchta d'Inish Inish Hu. 17. Siman is found on an object 18. אדם עשוי למשמש בכיסו בכל שעה
DAF DISCUSSIONS - BAVA METZIA 21

Donny Rudansky asked:

that when they start saying all the proofs by the first Ta'shema. but the first Ta'shema only says peiros mefuzarim but doesnt say hari eilu shelo and by all the other Ta'shemas it says Hari eilu shelo

Donny Rudansky, cedarhurst

The Kollel replies:

The Gemara does not say that the ruling in this case is Harei Eilu Shelo, but the Mishnah does indeed say that this is the ruling in this case. The Gemara just quotes the case of the Mishnah, and relies on us to know that the Mishnah rules Harei Eilu Shelo in this case.

I do not know why the Gemara does not quote the ruling in this case, whereas in the other cases the Gemara quotes the Gemara gives the ruling as well.

Dov Freedman