Why does the Torah juxtapose "ve'ha'Nefesh asher Tochal Basar ... Venichr'sah" to Kol Tahor Yochal Basar"?
Pesachim, 95b: To teach us that Zavin and Zavos, Nidos and Yoldos who eat from a Pesach that is brought be'Tum'ah (because most of the Tzibur were Tamei Meis), are Patur. 1
Menachos, 28b: To teach us that someone who eats the Basar of a Korban before the blood has been sprinkled is Patur from Kareis. 2
Seeing as we already know the Isur of eating Basar Kodshim Tamei via a Hekesh to Ma'aser Sheini, why does the Torah here mention specifically Shelamim?
Kerisos, 2b: To preclude Kodshei Bedek ha'Bayis, which, unlike Shelamim, are not Kodshei Mizbe'ach, from the Chiyuv Kareis.
What will be the Din if someone eats Kodshei Kodshim when he is Tamei?
Oznayim la'Torah: He is also Chayav Kareis. And the reason the Torah mentions Shelamim and not Kodshei Kodshim is a. because a Kohen who does so is already Chayav Kareis for entering the Azarah (where Kodshei Kodshim are eaten) be'Tum'ah and b. on account of the principle 'Kohanim Zerizim heim' and a warning not to transgress is uncalled for .
Why does the Torah add the words " ? mi?Zevach ha?Shelamim asher la'Hashem"?
Zevachim, 25b: To include the Emurim of Kodshim Kalim in the Isur Tum'ah.
Menachos, 25b: To include Lan (Basar that became Pasul be'Linah) and Yotzei (Basar that became Pasul be'Linah) in the Isur of Tum'ah ? but not Pigull, which we preclude from "mi'Zevach ha'Shelamim". 1
See Torah Temimah, note 83.
To whom is "ve'Tum'aso alav" referring?
Zevachim, 43b: Which we learn via a Gezeirah Shavah "ve'Tum'aso alav" "Od Tum'aso bo" fom Bi'as Mikdash Tamei, in Chukas, Bamidbar, 19:13. Refer also to 7:20:2:1. See also Torah Temimah, who cites also R. Yossi Acherim and Rebbi, all of whom learn it in different ways from the word "Alav".
Moshav Zekenim: Even though the Pasuk begins and ends in the feminine - "ve'ha'Nefesh Asher Tiga? ve'Nichresah", and the middle is masculine (which also refers to the person, and not to the Basar. Sifsei Chachamim.- we learn from a Gezeirah Shavah to "Od Tum'aso Vo" (Bamidbar 19:13), which clearly refers to Tum'as ha'Guf.
What are the implications of "ve'Tum'aso alav"?
Refer to 7:20:1:1*:.
Rambam (Pesulei ha'Mukdashim, 18:14): To preclude where the Tamei T'vul-Yom and a Mechusar Kipurim ? who have already shed part of their Tum'ah ? who eat Kodesh from Kareis.
What are the implications of "ha'Nefesh ha'Hi me'Amehah"?
From where do we learn the Azharah (the warning) against eating Kodshim be'Tun'as ha'Guf ?
Rashi: It is not explicit in the Torah; however the Gemara in Makos, 14b learns it from a Gezeirah Shavah "Tum'aso" "Tum'aso" in Bamidbar, 19:13 in connection with Tum'as Mikdash. 1
See Sifsei Chachamim.
What is the Din regarding a Tahor person who eats Tamei Kodshim?
Rashi: A Tahor person who eats Tamei Kodshim transgresses only a La'av ? and is not subject to Karesi - which we learn from "ve'ha'Basar asher Yiga be'Chol Tamei" in Pasuk 19.
Why does the Torah insert three K'risos in connection with someone who eats Kodshim be'Tum'as ha'Guf - here, in the next Pasuk and in 22:3?
Rashi: One is a K'lal, one is a P'rat 1 and one teaches us that Korban Oleh ve'Yored only applies to Tum'as Mikdash ve'Kodoshav. 2
Rashi (Shevu'os, 7a): It was included in the Klal and was mentioned independently, to teach us that Kareis is restricted to Kodshei Mizbe'ach but does not apply to Kodshei Bedek ha'Bayis.
Riva and Moshav Zekenim (in Pasuk 19): In Shevu'os 7a, [we conclude that] the third Pasuk comes to obligate for things that are not normally eaten -. wood, Levonah,and Ketores. (There, R. Shimon learns from it that one is liable for inner Chata'os for Tum'ah, even though he holds that Pigul does not apply to them. - PF)
Rashi - in Shevu'os 7a -writes that we expound Kerisos written about eating Kodshim be'Tum'as ha'Guf as a Klal, and something that left the Klal?'. Why do we not rather Darshen them as a Klal u'Ferat, and learn only the Prat?
Riva and Moshav Zekenim (citing Menachos 55b): We do not Darshen Klal u'Ferat when they are not next to one another.
QUESTIONS ON RASHI
Rashi writes that the warning against eating Kodshim be'Tun'as ha'Guf is not explicit in the Torah. But he himself (in 12:4) explained that "Lo Siga" is a warning against eating Kodshim?
Moshav Zekenim left this difficult. Seemingly, also this is not explicit! (PF)
