Why does the Pasuk insert the (otherwise superfluous) phrase "ve'Chi Yirbeh mimcha ha'Derech"?
Rashi (in Bava Metzi'a, 53): To teach us that one is not permitted to redeem Ma'aser Sheini (Tahor) in Yerushalayim - even in order to (purchase Korbanos, to) eat there bi'Kedushsh
Why does the Torah insert the (otherwise superfluous) word "ve'Chi Yirchak Mimcha ha'Derech"?
Makos, 19b: To teach us that, if the owner is in Yerushalayim, even if the Ma'aser 1 is still outside, he is prohibitted from redeeming it, since he and his Ma'aser ('Milu'acha') are not outside.
See Torah Temimah, note 60.
Having written "ve'Chi Yirbeh mimcha ha'Derech", why does the Torah need to add "Ki Lo Suchal Se'eiso"?
Pesachim, 27b: Because the word "Se'eiso" has connotations of eating 1 - to teach us that one is permitted to redeem Ma'aser Sheini that became Tamei, even in Yerushalayim - since it is forbidden to eat it. 2
Makos, 19b: To permit redeeming Ma'aser Sheini Tahor even one step outside Yerushalayim. 3 .
As in Mikeitz, Bereishis, 43:34 - "Vayisa Me'eis me'eis Panav".
See Torah Temimah, note 58.
See Torah Temimah, note 59.
What are the implications of "Ki Yevarechecha Hashem Elokecha"?