(a)Why, according to Rava, can one not examine two blisters that are side by side?
(b)What does he rule in a case where there is one blister that looks like two? What does this mean?
1)
(a)According to Rava, one cannot examine two blisters that are side by side - because this can only be the result of a hole in the lung, which automatically renders the animal a T'reifah..
(b)In a case where there is one blister that looks like two - where there is a split in the middle, one takes a thorn and makes an incision in one of the blisters, and checks whether they pour into each other (in which case they are one blister and the animal is Kasher), or not.
2)
(a)Rava describes the lung when it is hanging by its hind legs, with its innards facing the Shochet. How many Unos does it have ...
1. ... on the right?
2. ... on the left?
(b)What will be the Din, according to him, if ...
1. ... there are either too many Unos on either side or too few?
2. ... two Unos on the right and three on the left?
(c)On what grounds does he also declare T'reifah an animal with a lung that has an extra Unah?
2)
(a)Rava describes the lung when it is hanging by its forelegs, with its innards facing the Shochet. It has ...
1. ... three Unos on the right ...
2. ... and two on the left.
(b)According to him, if ...
1. ... there are either too many Unos on either side or too few, or if there are ...
2. ... two Unos on the right and three on the left - the animal is T'reifah.
(c)He also declares T'reifah an animal with a lung that has an extra Unah - based on the principle Kol Yeser ke'Natul Dami (one too many is like one too few).
3)
(a)What did Mereimar rule in the case of a lung that a Shochet brought before him which had an extra Una?
(b)And what did he tell the Shochet, when, at Rav Acha's instigation, the former returned to the Beis-Din to query his ruling?
(c)Under what conditions did Mereimar rule that it was Kasher?
(d)He conceded however, that it would be T'reifah if the extra Una was situated in the middle (in the area of the Inunisa de'Varda) or at the end (between the two Umos). In which third case does he agree that an extra Una would render the animal T'reifah?
3)
(a)In the case of a lung that a Shochet brought before him which had an extra Una - Mereimar declared it Kasher.
(b)When, at Rav Acha's instigation, the Shochet returned to Beis-Din to query Mereimar's ruling, the latter instructed him - to go and inform the man sitting outside the courtroom that the Halachah was not like Rava in the case of an extra Una ...
(c)... provided - it ran alongside the others as part of the row of Unos.
(d)He conceded however, that it would be T'reifah, if the extra Una was situated in the middle (in the area of the Inunisa de'Varda) or at the end (between the two Umos) - or if it was attached to the Uma.
4)
(a)A case came before Rav Ashi with an extra Una in the middle, which Rav Ashi wanted to declare T'reifah. What objection did Rav Huna bar Rav Ivya raise to that?
(b)How come that Rav Ashi was unaware of this?
(c)Why is this Una called Inunisa de'Varda?
(d)Under what circumstances does Rav Huna bar Ivya agree that even an Inunisa de'Varda as small as a myrtle-leaf renders the animal T'reifah?
4)
(a)A case came before Rav Ashi with an extra Una in the middle, which Rav Ashi wanted to declare T'reifah. Rav Huna bar Rav Ivya objected however, on the grounds that this Una (the Inunisa de'Varda) was common in the area where he came from, and should therefore be considered an extra Una in its regular location.
(b)Rav Ashi was unaware of this - because where he lived, the Inunisa de'Varda was uncommon.
(c)This Una is called Inunisa de'Varda - because it is small and bears a slight resemblance to a rose.
(d)Rav Huna bar Ivya agrees however, that even an Inunisa de'Varda as small as a myrtle-leaf renders the animal T'reifah - if it is situated at the back of the lung instead of at the front.
5)
(a)Nowadays, the vast majority of lungs possess an Inunisa de'Varda. What will be the Din if one is discovered without it?
(b)On what basis do we reject the opinion of those who maintain that if a lung is missing an Una on the right, the Inunisa de'Varda constitutes the third Una on the right?
(c)And what will be the Din if a lung possesses two Inunisi de'Varda?
5)
(a)In spite of the fact that nowadays, the vast majority of lungs possess an Inunisa de'Varda, should one discover one without it - the animal is nevertheless Kasher.
(b)We reject the opinion of those who maintain that if a lung is missing an Una on the right, the Inunisa de'Varda constitutes the third Una on the right - because it does not run alongside the other Unos.
(c)And if a lung possesses two Inunisi de'varda - the animal is T'reifah.
47b----------------------------------------47b
6)
(a)Rafram declares T'reifah an animal whose lungs resemble an Ufsa. What is an Ufsa?
(b)There are no less than five interpretations of what Rafram means. Some say that it means ba'Chazuta, which in turn, means that it resembles a rough block of wood in looks. Others say be'Gishta, and yet others, di'Nefichah. What is the meaning of ...
1. ... be'Gishta?
2. ... di'Nefichah?
(c)According to the Aruch, P'chiza means light (weight). Finally, what does de'Shi'a mean?
(d)What is the status of an animal whose lungs have the markings of a regular lung, but are not properly cut?
(e)Why is that?
6)
(a)Rafram declares T'reifah an animal whose lungs resemble an Ufsa - (a block of wood).
(b)There are no less than five interpretations of what Rafram means. Some say that it means ba'Chazuta, which in turn, means that it resembles a rough block of wood in looks. Others say ...
1. ... be'Gishta - it feels rough, and yet others ...
2. ... di'Nefichah - it is hard.
(c)According to the Aruch, P'chiza means light (weight). Finally, de'Shi'a means - it is not shaped like a lung with its five Unos, but consists of one large piece on the right and one on the left.
(d)An animal whose lungs have the markings of a regular lung, but are not properly cut - is Kasher ...
(e)... seeing as it does fit into the category of Shi'a.
7)
(a)Based on a statement by Rebbi Chanina, Rava declares an animal with blue lungs, Kasher, but with black lungs, T'reifah. What does Rebbi Chanina say about black blood?
(b)And what does Rava say about a lung which is red or green?
(c)How does he learn this from Rebbi Nasan in the Beraisa concerning two women whose first two babies died on account of the B'ris Milah?
7)
(a)Rava declares an animal with blue lungs, Kasher; with black lungs, T'reifah, based on a statement by Rebbi Chanina, who says that - black blood is really red blood that has been stricken.
(b)Rava declares a lung which is red or green - Kasher.
(c)He learns this from Rebbi Nasan in the Beraisa concerning the two women whose first two babies died on account of the B'ris Milah - and who teaches us that too much to little blood, is something that heals with time (as we will now explain).
8)
(a)What did Rebbi Nasan advise ...
1. ... the first woman, whose third baby was red?
2. ... the second woman, whose third baby was green?
(b)What conclusion do both episodes share?
(c)Rava declares an animal whose lung resembles a liver, Kasher. What does he say about one whose lung resembles a piece of meat?
(d)What Si'man, based on a Pasuk in Mishpatim, did he give as a reminder that it is the latter that is T'reifah?
8)
(a)Rebbi Nasan advised ...
1. ... the first woman, whose third baby was red - to wait until the blood became absorbed in the flesh before circumcising him.
2. ... the second woman, whose third baby was green - to wait until the blood had surfaced before circumcising him.
(b)In both episodes - the women followed Rebbi Nasan's instructions, the babies survived and they called them Nasan, after him (as a mark of gratitude).
(c)Rava declares an animal whose lung resembles a liver, Kasher; a piece of meat - T'reifah.
(d)The Si'man that he gives as a reminder that it is the latter that is T'reifah is - the Pasuk in Mishpatim "u'*Basar* ba'Sadeh *T'reifah* Lo Socheilu".
9)
(a)What does Rav Sama b'rei de'Rava say about a lung that is the color of hops, of safflower or of an egg?
(b)How do we reconcile the ruling regarding hops (which are green) with the previous ruling of Rava, who declared a green lung, Kasher?
(c)Ravina discusses a blocked lung (that one is unable to blow up). Under what circumstances may one declare it Kasher without any further inspection?
(d)What would one have to do, assuming that one did not find any puss there, to determine whether the animal is Kasher or not?
9)
(a)Rav Sama b'rei de'Rava - declares T'reifah a lung that is the color of hops, of safflower or of an egg.
(b)We reconcile the ruling regarding hops (which are green) with the previous ruling of Rava, who declared a green lung, Kasher - by establishing Rava's ruling by one that is (dark) green like a leek (See Tosfos DH 'Ela').
(c)Ravina discusses a blocked lung (that one is unable to blow up). One can declare it Kasher without any further inspection - if one cuts it open and finds it full of puss.
(d)Assuming that one did not find any puss there - one would have to examine it for escaping air, using a feather or spittle (as we explained earlier).
10)
(a)What does Rav Yosef say about a membrane that grows over a wound in the lung? Why is that?
(b)We have already cited Rav's Yosef's discussion regarding a lung which emits a noise. What does Ula Amar Rebbi Yochanan say about Re'ah she'Nishp'chah ke'Kiton (a lung that pours like a jar)?
(c)On what basis might we have assumed it to be T'reifah?
(d)What do we extrapolate from Ula's statement?
10)
(a)Rav Yosef rules that a membrane that grows over a wound in the lung - does not prevent the animal from being declared a T'reifah, since the membrane will not remain permanently intact (as we explained earlier).
(b)We have already cited Rav's Yosef's discussion regarding a lung which emits a noise. Ula Amar Rebbi Yochanan rules that - Re'ah she'Nishp'chah ke'Kiton (a lung that pours like a jar) is Kasher.
(c)We might have assumed it to be T'reifah - because, the melted flesh no longer fills the cavity, seemingly rendering it a Re'ah she'Chasrah.
(d)We extrapolate from Ula's statement that - an internal Chesaron is not considered a Chesaron.
11)
(a)Rebbi Aba queries Ula from our Mishnah 'ha'Re'ah she'Nikvah O she'Chasrah, T'reifah'. What makes Rebbi Aba think that the Tana is referring to an internal Chesaron (posing a Kashya on Ula), rather than an external one?
(b)To refute Rebbi Aba's proof, we establish the Mishnah like Rebbi Shimon. How does Rebbi Shimon qualify the Din of ha'Re'ah she'Nikvah?
(c)How does this refute Rebbi Aba's Kashya? What is now the Mishnah's Chidush?
11)
(a)Rebbi Aba queries Ula from our Mishnah 'ha'Re'ah she'Nikvah O she'Chasrah, T'reifah)'. Rebbi Aba thinks that the Tana is referring to an internal Chesaron (posing a Kashya on Ula), rather than an external one - because otherwise, what is the difference between Re'ah she'Nikvah and Re'ah she'Chasrah?
(b)To refute Rebbi Aba's Kashya, we establish the Mishnah like Rebbi Shimon, who qualifies the Din of ha'Re'ah she'Nikvah - by requiring the hole to penetrate as far as the Simponos.
(c)This refutes Rebbi Aba's Kashya - inasmuch as the Tana may well be speaking about an external Chesaron, and the Mishnah's Chidush is that although Rebbi Shimon qualifies the Tana Kama's ruling regarding Nikvah, he does not do so regarding Chasrah.
12)
(a)When Rebbi Chananyah fell ill, and Rebbi Nasan and all the Gedolei ha'Dor went to visit him, what did they bring him to examine?
(b)He too, declared it Kasher. How did Rava qualify his ruling?
(c)Rav Acha b'rei de'Rava asked Rav Ashi how it was possible to know whether the Simponos have remained intact or not. What did he reply?
(d)Why specifically an earthenware dish overlaid with lead?
12)
(a)When Rebbi Chananyah fell ill and Rebbi Nasan and all the Gedolei ha'Dor went to visit him, they brought with them - a lung that poured like a jar, for him to examine.
(b)He too, declared it Kasher, and Rava qualified his ruling - provided the Simponos remained intact.
(c)When Rav Acha b'rei de'Rava asked Rav Ashi how it was possible to know whether the Simponos remained intact or not, the latter replied that - one can do so by cutting open the lung and allowing the contents to spill into an earthenware dish overlaid with lead, and by then inspecting the contents for white spots, an indication that the Simponos also melted, in which case the animal will be T'reifah.
(d)He mentioned specifically an earthenware dish overlaid with lead - because it allows a clearer view of the contents than other receptacles of that time.
13)
(a)Rav Nachman declares Kasher an animal part of whose lung has melted, but not the skin. How does this differ from the previous case (of Re'ah she'Nishp'chah ke'Kiton)?
(b)What does a supporting Beraisa say about ...
1. ... a case where the part of the lung that is empty could have held as much as a Revi'is?
2. ... an animal whose womb is missing?
(c)The Tana also cites a She'eilah asked by the b'nei Asya regarding a liver that became wormy. How long did it take for the Gedolei Yavneh to reach a conclusion and take a vote on the matter?
(d)What did they ultimately rule?
13)
(a)Rav Nachman declares Kasher an animal part of whose lung has melted, but not the skin. This differs from the previous case (of Re'ah she'Nishp'chah ke'Kiton) - inasmuch as in this case, it is not the entire lung that melted, but only a small part of it. On the other hand, unlike the previous case, it emptied completely.
(b)A supporting Beraisa says that ...
1. ... the animal is Kasher - even if the part of the lung that is empty could have held as much as a Revi'is.
2. ... an animal whose womb is missing - is Kasher too.
(c)The Tana also cites a She'eilah asked by the b'nei Asya regarding a liver that became wormy. It took three Yamim-Tovim for the Gedolei Yavneh to reach a conclusion and take a vote on the matter.
